Abstract
The relationship between prey abundance and predation is often examined in single habitat units or populations, but predators may occupy landscapes with diverse habitats and foraging opportunities. The vulnerability of prey within populations may depend on habitat features that hinder predation, and increased density of conspecifics in both the immediate vicinity and the broader landscape. We evaluated the relative effects of physical habitat, local, and neighborhood prey density on predation by brown bears on sockeye salmon in a suite of 27 streams using hierarchical Bayesian functional response models. Stream depth and width were inversely related to the maximum proportion of salmon killed, but not the asymptotic limit on total number killed. Interannual variation in predation was density dependent; the number of salmon killed increased with fish density in each stream towards an asymptote. Seven streams in two geographical groups with ≥23 years of data in common were then analyzed for neighborhood density effects. In most (12 of 18) cases predation in a stream was reduced by increasing salmon abundance in neighboring streams. The uncertainty in the estimates for these neighborhood effects may have resulted from interactions between salmon abundance and habitat that influenced foraging by bears, and from bear behavior (e.g., competitive exclusion) and abundance. Taken together, the results indicated that predator–prey interactions depend on density at multiple spatial scales, and on habitat features of the surrounding landscape. Explicit consideration of this context dependency should lead to improved understanding of the ecological impacts of predation across ecosystems and taxa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addicott JF, Aho JM, Antolin MF, Padilla DK, Richardson JS, Soluk DA (1987) Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49:340–346
Anderson TW (2001) Predator responses, prey refuges, and density-dependent mortality of a marine fish. Ecology 82:245–257
Ben-David M, Hanley TA, Schell DM (1998) Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning Pacific salmon: the role of flooding and predator activity. Oikos 83:47–55
Ben-David M, Titus K, Beier LR (2004) Consumption of salmon by Alaskan brown bears: a trade-off between nutritional requirements and the risk of infanticide? Oecologia 138:465–474
Carlson SM, Hilborn R, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2007) Predation by bears drives senescence in natural populations of salmon. PLoS One 2:e1286
Carlson SM, Rich HB Jr, Quinn TP (2009) Does variation in selection imposed by bears drive divergence among populations in the size and shape of sockeye salmon? Evolution 63:1244–1261
Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136
Cressie N, Calder CA, Clark JS, Ver Hoef JM, Wikle CK (2009) Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling. Ecol Appl 19:553–570
Deacy W, Leacock W, Armstrong JB, Stanford JA (2016) Kodiak brown bears surf the salmon red wave: direct evidence from GPS collared individuals. Ecology 97:1091–1098
DeAngelis DL, Petersen JH (2001) Importance of the predator’s ecological neighborhood in modeling predation on migrating prey. Oikos 94:315–325
Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175
Farley SD, Robbins CT (1995) Lactation, hibernation and weight dynamics of American black and grizzly bears. Can J Zool 73:2216–2222
Fortin D, Buono P, Schmitz OJ, Courbin N, Losier C, St-Laurent M-H, Drapeau P, Heppell S, Dussault C, Brodeur V, Mainguy J (2015) A spatial theory for characterizing predator–multiprey interactions in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc R Soc B 282:20150973
Fryxell JM, Mosser A, Sinclair ARE, Packer C (2007) Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics. Nature 449:1041–1043
Gelman A (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal 1:515–533
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–511
Gende SM, Quinn TP (2004) The relative importance of prey density and social dominance in determining energy intake by bears feeding on Pacific salmon. Can J Zool 82:75–85
Gende SM, Quinn TP, Willson MF (2001) Consumption choice by bears feeding on salmon. Oecologia 127:372–382
Gende SM, Quinn TP, Hilborn R, Hendry AP, Dickerson B (2004) Brown bears selectively kill salmon with higher energy content but only in habitats that facilitate choice. Oikos 104:518–528
Gende SM, Miller AE, Hood E (2007) The effects of salmon carcasses on soil nitrogen pools in a riparian forest of southeastern Alaska. Can J For Res 37:1194–1202
Gese EM, Ruff RL, Crabtree RL (1996a) Foraging ecology of coyotes (Canis latrans): the influence of extrinsic factors and a dominance hierarchy. Can J Zool 74:769–783
Gese EM, Ruff RL, Crabtree RL (1996b) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing coyote predation of small mammals in Yellowstone National Park. Can J Zool 74:784–797
Gilioli G, Pasquali S, Ruggeri F (2008) Bayesian inference for functional response in a stochastic predator–prey system. Bull Math Biol 70:358–381
Gill ID, Helfield JM (2012) Alternative foraging strategies among bears fishing for salmon: a test of the dominance hypothesis. Can J Zool 90:766–775
Gorini L, Linnell JDC, May R, Panzacchi M, Boitani L, Odden M, Nilsen EB (2012) Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions. Mamm Rev 42:55–77
Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH, McDonald TL (2005) Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf-elk predator–prey system. Oikos 111:101–111
Helfield JM, Naiman RJ (2006) Keystone interactions: salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems 9:167–180
Hilborn R, Quinn TP, Schindler DE, Rogers DE (2003) Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6564–6568
Hilderbrand GV, Schwartz CC, Robbins CT, Jacoby ME, Hanley TA, Arthur SM, Servheen C (1999) The importance of meat, particularly salmon, to body size, population productivity, and conservation of North American brown bears. Can J Zool 77:132–138
Hobbs NT, Andren H, Persson J, Aronsson M, Chapron G (2012) Native predators reduce harvest of reindeer by Sami pastoralists. Ecol Appl 22:1640–1654
Hocking MD, Reimchen TE (2009) Salmon species, density and watershed size predict magnitude of marine enrichment in riparian food webs. Oikos 118:1307–1318
Hocking MD, King RA, Reimchen TE (2009) The ecology of terrestrial invertebrates on Pacific salmon carcasses. Ecol Res 24:1091–1100
Holling CS (1959a) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293–320
Holling CS (1959b) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398
Holtgrieve GW, Schindler DE, Jewett PK (2009) Large predators and biogeochemical hotspots: brown bear (Ursus arctos) predation on salmon alters nitrogen cycling in riparian soils. Ecol Res 24:1125–1135
Hossie TJ, Murray DL (2016) Spatial arrangement of prey affects the shape of ratio-dependent functional response in strongly antagonistic predators. Ecology. doi:10.1890/15-1535
Hunsicker ME, Ciannelli L, Bailey KM, Buckel JA, White JW, Link JS, Essington TE, Gaichas S, Anderson TW, Brodeur RD, Chan K, Chen K, Englund G, Frank KT, Freitas V, Hixon MA, Hurst T, Johnson DW, Kitchell JF, Reese D, Rose GA, Sjodin H, Sydeman WJ, van der Veer HW, Vollset K, Zador S (2011) Functional responses and scaling in predator–prey interactions of marine fishes: contemporary issues and emerging concepts. Ecol Lett 14:1288–1299
Kline TC Jr, Goering JJ, Mathisen OA, Poe P, Parker PL, Scalan RS (1993) Recycling of elements transported upstream by runs of Pacific salmon: II. d15N and d13C evidence in the Kvichak River watershed, Bristol Bay, Southern Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2350–2365
Koel TM, Bigelow PE, Doepke PD, Ertel BD, Mahony DL (2005) Nonnative lake trout result in Yellowstone cutthroat trout decline and impacts to bears and anglers. Fisheries 30:10–19
Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75
Marriott RA (1964) Stream catalog of the Wood River lake system, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Special Scientific Report, Fisheries 494, US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC
McCarthy EK, White JW (2016) Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging. Oecologia 180:305–311
McCoy MW, Bolker BM, Warkentin KM, Vonesh JR (2011) Predicting predation through prey ontogeny using size-dependent functional response models. Am Nat 177:752–766
McPhee HM, Webb NF, Merrill EH (2012) Time-to-kill: measuring attack rates in a heterogenous landscape with multiple prey types. Oikos 121:711–720
Meehan EP, Seminet-Reneau EE, Quinn TP (2005) Bear predation on Pacific salmon facilitates colonization of carcasses by fly maggots. Am Midl Nat 153:142–151
Morgan RA, Brown JS, Thorson JM (1997) The effect of spatial scale on the functional response of fox squirrels. Ecology 78:1087–1097
Mowat G, Heard DC (2006) Major components of grizzly bear diet across North America. Can J Zool 84:473–489
Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:2–131
Nachman G (2006) A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patchy habitat. J Anim Ecol 75:948–958
Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Schindler DE, Helfield JM (2002) Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems 5:399–417
Ogle K (2009) Hierarchical Bayesian statistics: merging experimental and modeling approaches in ecology. Ecol Appl 19:577–581
Pess GR, Quinn TP, Schindler DE, Liermann MC (2014) Freshwater habitat associations between pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), chum (O. keta), and Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) in a watershed dominated by sockeye salmon (O. nerka) abundance. Ecol Freshw Fish 23:360–372
Plummer M (2013) JAGS Version 3.4.0 user manual
Quinn TP (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Quinn TP, Buck GB (2000) Scavenging by brown bears, Ursus arctos, and glaucous-winged gulls, Larus glaucescens, on adult sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can Field Nat 114:217–223
Quinn TP, Wetzel L, Bishop S, Overberg K, Rogers DE (2001) Influence of breeding habitat on bear predation, and age at maturity and sexual dimorphism of sockeye salmon populations. Can J Zool 79:1782–1793
Quinn TP, Gende SM, Ruggerone GT, Rogers DE (2003) Density-dependent predation by brown bears (Ursus arctos) on sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:553–562
Quinn TP, Carlson SM, Gende SM, Rich HB Jr (2009) Transportation of Pacific salmon carcasses from streams to riparian forests by bears. Can J Zool 87:195–203
Quinn TP, Rich HB Jr, Gosse D, Schtickzelle N (2012) Population dynamics and asynchrony at fine spatial scales: a case history of sockeye salmon population structure in Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:297–306
Quinn TP, Wirsing AJ, Smith B, Cunningham CJ, Ching J (2014) Complementary use of motion-activated cameras and unbaited wire snares for DNA sampling reveals diel and seasonal activity patterns of brown bears foraging on adult sockeye salmon. Can J Zool 92:893–903
R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Reimchen TE (2000) Some ecological and evolutionary aspects of bear-salmon interactions in coastal British Columbia. Can J Zool 78:448–458
Rogers LA, Schindler DE (2008) Asynchrony in population dynamics of sockeye salmon in southwest Alaska. Oikos 117:1578–1586
Ruggerone GT, Hanson R, Rogers DE (2000) Selective predation by brown bears (Ursus arctos) foraging on spawning sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Zool 78:974–981
Smout S, Asseburg C, Matthiopoulos J, Fernandez C, Redpath S, Thirgood S, Harwood J (2010) The functional response of a generalist predator. PLoS One 5:e10761
Solomon ME (1949) The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 18:1–35
Su Y, Yajima M (2015) R2jags: using R to Run ‘JAGS’. R package version 0.5-7
Van Daele MB, Robbins CT, Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Van Daele LJ, Leacock WB (2013) Salmon consumption by Kodiak brown bears (Ursus arctos middendorffi) with ecosystem management implications. Can J Zool 91:164–174
Watts PD, Jonkel C (1988) Energetic cost of winter dormancy in grizzly bear. J Wildl Manag 52:654–656
Wikle CK (2003) Hierarchical models in environmental science. Int Stat Rev 71:181–199
Willson MF, Gende SM, Bisson PA (2004) Anadromous fishes as ecological links between ocean, fresh water, and land. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 284–300
Winder M, Schindler DE, Moore JW, Johnson SP, Palen WJ (2005) Do bears facilitate transfer of salmon resources to aquatic macroinvertebrates? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2285–2293
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the late Donald Rogers, who initiated bear predation work in the Wood River system and played the key role in maintaining the long-term research program on sockeye salmon in Bristol Bay. We also thank the many entities that have provided financial support for the program over the years, including the seafood industry, National Science Foundation’s BioComplexity and Coupled Natural and Human Systems programs, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Field work has been conducted by very many people but we especially thank Daniel Schindler and co-workers for the surveys of tributaries of Lake Nerka and other upper lakes in the Wood River system, and Jackie Carter and Chris Boatright for Lake Aleknagik tributaries, database management, and overall program assistance. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the paper.
Author contribution statement
TPQ has been leading this study and collecting the data for over two decades. CJC assisted in data collection and did the Bayesian modeling. AJW assisted in data collection and conceptualization of the study. All authors contributed substantially to manuscript preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Joel Trexler.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinn, T.P., Cunningham, C.J. & Wirsing, A.J. Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon. Oecologia 183, 415–429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3782-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3782-3