Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiomegaly in a premature neonate after venous umbilical catheterization

  • Short Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Umbilical venous catheters allow rapid central access in neonates, but may be associated with various complications. We present a case of a newborn with pericardial effusion following umbilical venous catheterization. An extremely low birth weight infant was intubated for respiratory distress syndrome and had umbilical venous and arterial lines in place. Massive cardiomegaly was noted on the subsequent chest X-ray. Echocardiography revealed a large pericardial effusion without signs of tamponade. After removing the catheter, the effusion gradually resolved. While pericardial effusion is a well-known complication of percutaneous long central lines, only a few case reports have documented sudden cardiovascular compromise associated with umbilical venous catheters. Pericardial effusion may be asymptomatic and should be suspected in infants with central catheters and progressive cardiomegaly. The prompt removal of catheters and, if signs of cardiac tamponade are present, emergency pericardiocentesis may prove to be life-saving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

UVC:

Umbilical venous catheter

UAC:

Umbilical arterial catheter

PICC:

Peripherally inserted central catheter

References

  1. Beardsall K, White DK, Pinto EM, Kelsall AW (2003) Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade as complications of neonatal long lines: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F292–F295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler-O’Hara M, Buzzard CJ, Reubens L, McDermott MP, DiGrazio W, D’Angio CT (2006) A randomized trial comparing long-term and short-term use of umbilical venous catheters in premature infants with birth weights of less than 1251 grams. Pediatrics 118:e25–e35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Darling JC, Newell SJ, Mohamdee O, Uzun O, Cullinane CJ, Dear PR (2001) Central venous catheter tip in the right atrium: a risk factor for neonatal cardiac tamponade. J Perinatol 21:461–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nowlen TT, Rosenthal GL, Johnson GL, Tom DJ, Vargo TA (2002) Pericardial effusion and tamponade in infants with central catheters. Pediatrics 110:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Onal EE, Saygili A, Koç E, Türkyilmaz C, Okumus N, Atalay Y (2004) Cardiac tamponade in a newborn because of umbilical venous catheterization: is correct position safe? Paediatr Anaesth 14:953–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pezzati M, Filippi L, Chiti G, Dani C, Rossi S, Bertini G, Rubaltelli FF (2004) Central venous catheters and cardiac tamponade in preterm infants. Intensive Care Med 30:2253–2256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salvadori S, Piva D, Filippone M (2002) Umbilical venous line displacement as a consequence of abdominal girth variation. J Pediatr 141:737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sehgal A, Cook V, Dunn M (2007) Pericardial effusion associated with an appropriately placed umbilical venous catheter. J Perinatol 27:317–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Traen M, Schepens E, Laroche S, van Overmeire B (2005) Cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion due to venous umbilical catheterization. Acta Paediatr 94:626–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest statement

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luregn Jan Schlapbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlapbach, L.J., Pfammatter, JP., Nelle, M. et al. Cardiomegaly in a premature neonate after venous umbilical catheterization. Eur J Pediatr 168, 107–109 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0704-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0704-3

Keywords

Navigation