Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An intra-operative RT-LAMP method allows rapid and reliable detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid determination of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer patients plays a significant role in the selection of a surgery strategy. Although a previous one-step nucleic acid amplification assay that uses reverse-transcription (RT) loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has showed specific advantages over traditional pathological examination, its target marker requires optimisation. In addition to epithelial-specific CK19, the internal control gene PBGD and the breast-specific PIP were included in the new method. After the RT-LAMP primers were designed and verified using a cell line, the performance of our method was evaluated by comparing it with the corresponding result of the Food and Drug Administration approved breast lymph node (BLN) assay and routine pathological examination. One hundred and seventy-four valid SLN samples from 101 patients were collected from five hospitals. The threshold of reaction time for CK19, PIP and PBGD was defined as 16, 20 and 20 min, respectively. Compared with the BLN assay, the concordance rate of our method was 95.4 % (166/174). Statistical analysis revealed that the two methods are consistent (kappa = 0.890, P < 0.001). When compared with pathological examination, the performance of our method (sensitivity = 81.3 %, specificity = 89.7 %, kappa = 0.691, P < 0.001) was similar to that of the BLN assay (sensitivity = 87.5 %, specificity = 84.9 %, kappa = 0.668, P < 0.001). This result demonstrates the potential usefulness of our method in clinical practice. In conclusion, we preliminarily established an intra-operative diagnostic method that assimilates the merits of previous assays. In contrast with the BLN assay and pathological examination, our method can be completed in 30 min and shows high sensitivity, specificity and consistency, which we consider as promising for clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halsted WS (1984) The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg 20(5):497–555

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, Bauer M, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Montague E, Margolese R, Foster R (1985) Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 312:674–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-five year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 347:567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P (1998) The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339(14):941–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao R, Euhus D, Mayo HG, Balch C (2013) Axillary node interventions in breast cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 310(13):1385–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noguchi M, Morioka E, Ohno Y, Noguchi M, Nakano Y, Kosaka T (2013) The changing role of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 20(1):41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Angelo-Donovan DD, Dickson-Witmer D, Petrelli NJ (2012) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a history and current clinical recommendations. Surg Oncol 21(3):196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jafferbhoy S, McWilliams B (2012) Clinical significance and management of sentinel node micrometastasis in invasive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 12(5):308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL, Benson AB 3rd, Bosserman LD, Burstein HJ, Cody H 3rd, Hayman J, Perkins CL, Podoloff DA, Giuliano AE (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 32(13):1365–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast Cancer Version 3.2014

  12. Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq JP, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Borisch B, Connolly CE, Decker T, Dervan P, Drijkoningen M, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Eusebi V, Faverly D, Heikkila P, Holland R, Kerner H, Kulka J, Jacquemier J, Lacerda M, Martinez-Penuela J, De Miguel C, Peterse JL, Rank F, Regitnig P, Reiner A, Sapino A, Sigal-Zafrani B, Tanous AM, Thorstenson S, Zozaya E, Fejes G, Wells CA (2004) Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European working group for breast screening pathology. J Clin Pathol 57(7):695–701

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts CA, Beitsch PD, Litz CE, Hilton DS, Ewing GE, Clifford E, Taylor W, Hapke MR, Babaian A, Khalid I, Hall JD, Lindberg G, Molberg K, Saboorian H (2003) Interpretive disparity among pathologists in breast sentinel lymph node evaluation. Am J Surg 186(4):324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Layfield DM, Agrawal A, Roche H, Cutress RI (2011) Intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Br J Surg 98(1):4–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blumencranz P, Whitworth PW, Deck K, Rosenberg A, Reintgen D, Beitsch P, Chagpar A, Julian T, Saha S, Mamounas E, Giuliano A, Simmons R (2007) Scientific impact recognition award. Sentinel node staging for breast cancer: intraoperative molecular pathology overcomes conventional histologic sampling errors. Am J Surg 194(4):426–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viale G, Dell’Orto P, Biasi MO, Stufano V, De Brito Lima LN, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Vargo JM, Green G, Cao W, Swijter A, Mazzarol G (2008) Comparative evaluation of an extensive histopathologic examination and a real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19 on axillary sentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients. Ann Surg 247(1):136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Julian TB, Blumencranz P, Deck K, Whitworth P, Berry DA, Berry SM, Rosenberg A, Chagpar AB, Reintgen D, Beitsch P, Simmons R, Saha S, Mamounas EP, Giuliano A (2008) Novel intraoperative molecular test for sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3338–3345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Funasako Y, Uenosono Y, Hirata M, Arigami T, Yanagita S, Arima H, Ehi K, Kijima Y, Yoshinaka H, Natsugoe S (2010) Utility of the GeneSearch breast lymph node assay for the rapid evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Cancer 116(19):4450–4455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tafe LJ, Schwab MC, Lefferts JA, Wells WA, Tsongalis GJ (2010) A validation study of a new molecular diagnostic assay: the Dartmouth-Hitchcock medical center experience with the GeneSearch BLN assay in breast sentinel lymph nodes. Exp Mol Pathol 88(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes SJ, Xi L, Raja S, Gooding W, Cole DJ, Gillanders WE, Mikhitarian K, McCarty K, Silver S, Ching J, McMillan W, Luketich JD, Godfrey TE (2006) A rapid, fully automated, molecular-based assay accurately analyzes sentinel lymph nodes for the presence of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Surg 243(3):389–398

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes SJ, Xi L, Gooding WE, Cole DJ, Mitas M, Metcalf J, Bhargava R, Dabbs D, Ching J, Kozma L, McMillan W, Godfrey TE (2009) A quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for rapid, automated analysis of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes. J Mol Diagn 11(6):576–582

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsujimoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yoshidome K, Kaneko T, Iwase T, Akiyama F, Kato Y, Tsuda H, Ueda S, Sato K, Tamaki Y, Noguchi S, Kataoka TR, Nakajima H, Komoike Y, Inaji H, Tsugawa K, Suzuki K, Nakamura S, Daitoh M, Otomo Y, Matsuura N (2007) One-step nucleic acid amplification for intraoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 13(16):4807–4816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28(12):E63

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagamine K, Hase T, Notomi T (2002) Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol Cell Probes 16(3):223–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamaki Y, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Kaneko T, Tsuda H, Sato K, Ueda S, Mano M, Masuda N, Takeda M, Tsujimoto M, Yoshidome K, Inaji H, Nakajima H, Komoike Y, Kataoka TR, Nakamura S, Suzuki K, Tsugawa K, Wakasa K, Okino T, Kato Y, Noguchi S, Matsuura N (2009) Molecular detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter trial using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay. Clin Cancer Res 15(8):2879–2884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Osako T, Iwase T, Kimura K, Yamashita K, Horii R, Yanagisawa A, Akiyama F (2011) Intraoperative molecular assay for sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage breast cancer: a comparative analysis between one-step nucleic acid amplification whole node assay and routine frozen section histology. Cancer 117(19):4365–4374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Snook KL, Layer GT, Jackson PA, de Vries CS, Shousha S, Sinnett HD, Nigar E, Singhal H, Chia Y, Cunnick G, Kissin MW; OSNA Study Group (2011) Multicentre evaluation of intraoperative molecular analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma. Br J Surg 98(4):527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vilardell F, Novell A, Martin J, Santacana M, Velasco A, Díez-Castro MJ, Cuevas D, Panadés MJ, González S, Llombart A, Iglesias E, Matias-Guiu X (2012) Importance of assessing CK19 immunostaining in core biopsies in patients subjected to sentinel node study by OSNA. Virchows Arch 460(6):569–575

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Frère-Belda MA, Bats AS, Gillaizeau F, Poulet B, Clough KB, Nos C, Peoc’h M, Seffert P, Bouteille C, Leroux A, Guillemin F, Blanc-Fournier C, Crouet H, Arnould L, Cuisenier J, Penault-Llorca F, Gimbergues P, Jacquemier J, Houvenaeghel G, Chatellier G, Lécuru F (2012) Diagnostic performance of one-step nucleic acid amplification for intraoperative sentinel node metastasis detection in breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 130(10):2377–2386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castellano I, Macrì L, Deambrogio C, Balmativola D, Bussone R, Ala A, Coluccia C, Sapino A (2012) Reliability of whole sentinel lymph node analysis by one-step nucleic acid amplification for intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer metastases. Ann Surg 255(2):334–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yun K, Gunn J, Merrie AE, Phillips LV, McCall JL (1997) Keratin 19 mRNA is detectable by RT-PCR in lymph nodes of patients without breast cancer. Br J Cancer 76(8):1112–1113

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bostick PJ, Chatterjee S, Chi DD, Huynh KT, Giuliano AE, Cote R, Hoon DS (1998) Limitations of specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction markers in the detection of metastases in the lymph nodes and blood of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 16(8):2632–2640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. St John A, Price CP (2013) Economic evidence and point-of-care testing. Clin Biochem Rev 34(2):61–74

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the excellent assistance of Jia Mi and Fengjing Li (from Beijing Lanpu Bio-tech Co., Ltd.) in design of LAMP primer. The study was supported by the Major Special Project of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (D09050703570905).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Liu or Chengze Yu.

Additional information

X. Hao and Y. Liu contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 28 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 27 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, X., Liu, Y., Li, X. et al. An intra-operative RT-LAMP method allows rapid and reliable detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Virchows Arch 466, 169–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-014-1693-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-014-1693-4

Keywords

Navigation