Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of liquid-based cytology in hormone receptor analysis of breast cancer specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the hormone receptor (HR) in breast cancer cytology is an important issue nowadays. Several studies have shown discrepancy in the HR status between the primary tumor and metastases. Cytology can be used for patients with metastatic disease. Although cytological assessment of HR is an excellent method, it has not been routinely used because of the difficulty in consistently preparing multiple good quality slides. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparation is considered as the key to resolving the aforementioned problem; however, few studies have reported the HR assessment in breast cancer using LBC. Therefore, the HR status of LBC slides from 82 breast cancers was compared with that of the corresponding surgical specimens. The HR assay in both the LBC slides and surgical specimens was conducted by IHC using an autostainer. For the IHC staining, the protocol recommended by the manufacturer for paraffin-embedded sections was used for both the cytology and histology specimens. The HR results of the cytology agreed with those of the histology in 80 of the 82 cases (accuracy rate, 98%) for estrogen receptor, and in 78 of the 82 cases (accuracy rate, 95%) for progesterone receptor. The overall accuracy of the HR status on the cytology and the histology was 99% in 81 of the 82 cases. In conclusion, in HR analysis of breast cancers, LBC followed by IHC using an autostainer was useful for the standard processing of cytological specimens and showed a good correlation with the results of analysis on the histology specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lower EE, Glass EL, Bradley DA, Blau R, Heffelfinger S (2005) Impact of metastatic estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status on survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 90:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guarneri V, Giovannelli S, Ficarra G et al (2008) Comparison of HER-2 and hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancers and asynchronous paired metastases: impact on patient management. Oncologist 13:838–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broom RJ, Tang PA, Simmons C et al (2009) Changes in estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2/neu status with time: discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Res 29:1557–1562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Idirisinghe PK, Thike AA, Cheok PY et al (2010) Hormone receptor and c-ERBB2 status in distant metastatic and locally recurrent breast cancer: pathologic correlations and clinical significance. Am J Clin Pathol 133:416–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reiner A, Spona J, Reiner G et al (1986) Estrogen receptor analysis on biopsies and fine-needle aspirates from human breast carcinoma. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Am J Pathol 125:443–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nizzoli R, Bozzetti C, Naldi N et al (2000) Comparison of the results of immunocytochemical assays for biologic variables on preoperative fine-needle aspirates and on surgical specimens of primary breast carcinomas. Cancer Cytopathol 90:61–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmitt FC, Bento MJ, Amendoeira I (1995) Estimation of estrogen receptor content in fine-needle aspirates from breast cancer using the monoclonal antibody 1D5 and microwave oven processing: correlation with paraffin embedded and frozen sections determinations. Diagn Cytopathol 13:347–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marrazzo A, Taormina P, Leonardi P, Lupo F, Filosto S (1995) Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors on 219 fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer. A prospective study. Anticancer Res 15:521–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Railo M, Nordling S, Krogerus L, Sioris T, vonSmitten K (1996) Preoparative assessment of proliferative activity and hormonal receptor status in carcinoma of the breast: a comparison of needle aspiration and needle-core biopsies to the surgical specimen. Diagn Cytopathol 15:205–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leung SW, Bédard YC (1999) Estorogen and progesterone receptor contents in ThinPrep-processed fine-needle aspirates of breast. Am J Clin Pathol 112:50–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nizzoli R, Bozzetti C, Savoldi L et al (1994) Immunocytochemical assay of estrogen and progesterone receptors in fine needle aspirates from breast cancer patients. Acta Cytol 38:933–938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cano G, Milanezi F, Leitão D, Ricardo S, Brito MJ, Schmitt FC (2003) Estimation of hormone receptor status in fine-needle aspirates and paraffin-embedded sections from breast cancer using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies SP1 and SP2. Dagn Cytopathol 29:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gong Y, Symmans WF, Krishnamurthy S, Patel S, Sneige N (2004) Optimal fixation conditions for immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptor in cytologic specimens of breast carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 102:34–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moriki T, Takahashi T, Ueta S, Mitani M, Ichien M (2004) Hormone receptor status and HER2/neu overexpression determined by automated immunostainer on routinely fixed cytologic specimens from breast carcinoma: correlation with histologic sections determinations and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 30:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernando IN, Powles TJ, Dowsett M et al (1995) Determining factors which predict response to primary medical therapy in breast cancer using a single fine needle aspirate with immunocytochemical staining and flow cytometry. Virchows Arch 426:155–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zoppi JA, Rotundo AV, Sundblad AS (2002) Correlation of immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 46:337–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konofaos P, Kontzoglou K, Georgoulakis J et al (2006) The role of ThinPrep cytology in the evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptor content of breast tumors. Surg Oncol 15:257–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sauer T, Beraki E, Jebsen PW et al (1998) Assessing estrogen and progestrone receptor status in fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Results on six years of material and correlation with biochemical assay. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 20:122–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malaviya AA, Chinoy RF, Prabhundesai NM, Sawant MH, Parmar V, Badwe RA (2006) Immunohistochemistry on scrape cytology in breast cancer: will it unearth the weaker positives? Acta Cytol 50:284–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudock JA, Hanau CA, Christen R, Bibbo M (1996) Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in cytologic specimens using various fixatives. Diagn Cytopathol 15:78–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bédard YC, Pollett AF (1999) Breast fine-needle aspiration: a comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears. Am J Clin Pathol 111:523–527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kontzoglou K, Moulakakis KG, Konofaos P, Kyriazi M, Kyroudes A, Karakitsos P (2005) The role of liquid-basd cytology in the investigation of breast lesions using fine-needle aspiration: a cytohistopathological evaluation. J Surg Oncol 89:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Komatsu K, Nakanishi Y, Seki T et al (2008) Application of liquid-based preparation to fine needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 52:591–596

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabbara SO, Sidawy MK, Frost AR et al (1998) The stability of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression on breast carcinoma cells stored PreservCyt suspensions and as ThinPrep slides. Cancer 84:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, and Grants-in-Aid for Clinical Research from the National Hospital Organization.

We thank Dr. Takahiro Hasebe of the Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center for his precious advice on this research.

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rieko Nishimura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishimura, R., Aogi, K., Yamamoto, T. et al. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology in hormone receptor analysis of breast cancer specimens. Virchows Arch 458, 153–158 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-1025-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-1025-2

Keywords

Navigation