Abstract
Motor inhibition and attentional processing are tightly linked. Recent neurophysiological studies have shown that both processes might rely on similar cognitive and neural mechanisms (Wessel and Aron, Neuron 93:259–280, 2017). However, it remains unclear whether attentional reorientation influences inhibition of a subsequent action. Therefore, we combined two tasks that are commonly used in the motor inhibition and visual attention reorientation field [respectively: the stop-signal task (Logan and Cowan, Psychol Rev 91:295–327, 1984) and the Posner endogenous cueing paradigm (Posner, Q J Exp Psychol 32(1):3–25, 1980)] to investigate how different aspects of visual attention modulate subsequent voluntary inhibition. Our results showed an increase in stopping-reaction time after a reorientation of attention only. This suggests a specific impairment of inhibitory control when a reorientation of visual attention is needed. These findings support the idea of a selective influence of attention reorientation on subsequent motor inhibition (stop signal). This may be linked to the “circuit breaker” hypothesis, proposing that attention reorientation toward an unexpected event “resets” the ongoing processes to allow the analysis of the potentially behaviorally relevant visual events (Corbetta et al., Neuron 58(3):306–324, 2008).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69(12), e55–e68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024.
Aron, A. R., Durston, S., Eagle, D. M., Logan, G. D., Stinear, C. M., & Stuphorn, V. (2007). Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11860–11864. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-07.2007.
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010.
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003.
Arrington, C. M., Carr, T. H., Mayer, A. R., & Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 Suppl, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900563975.
Band, G. P. H., van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica, 112(2), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3.
Barcelo, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Periáñez, J. A. (2006). Task Switching and Novelty Processing Activate a Common Neural Network for Cognitive Control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1734–1748. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1734.
Barceló, F., Periáñez, J., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Think differently: A brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200210280-00011.
Bartoli, E., Aron, A. R., & Tandon, N. (2018). Topography and timing of activity in right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula for stopping movement. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23835.
Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1664.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357.
Burnham, B. R. (2007). Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 392–422.
Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Gould, I. C., English, T., Garavan, H., McNaught, E., et al. (2007). Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(6), 3638–3647. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00685.2007.
Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2009). Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016.
Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Hirose, S., Yamashita, K., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2009). Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15870–15877. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3645-09.2009.
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/73009.
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755.
Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39(2), 131–143.
Donchin, E. (1981). Presidential address. 1980. Surprise!… Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18(5), 493–513.
Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Chambers, C. D., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 27–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.004.
Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562997.
Gentsch, A., Ullsperger, P., & Ullsperger, M. (2009). Dissociable medial frontal negativities from a common monitoring system for self- and externally caused failure of goal achievement. NeuroImage, 47(4), 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.064.
Hampshire, A., Chamberlain, S. R., Monti, M. M., Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2010). The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: Inhibition and attentional control. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109.
Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 247–273).
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/72999.
Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., & Logan, G. D. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9(4), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491.
Laming, D. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-X.
Lasaponara, S., Chica, A. B., Lecce, F., Lupianez, J., & Doricchi, F. (2011). ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: Challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2648–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.012.
Leiva, A., Parmentier, F. B. R., Elchlepp, H., & Verbruggen, F. (2015). Reorienting the mind: The impact of novel sounds on go/no-go performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(5), 1197–1202.
Levy, B. J., & Wagner, A. D. (2011). Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: Reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x.Cognitive.
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.
Logan, G. D., Van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control. Psychological Review, 121(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035230.
Nachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. (2008). Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2478.
Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., & Mesulam, M. M. (1999). Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/4513.
Parmentier, F. B. R. (2014). The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: A review. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4.
Parmentier, F. B. R. (2016). Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000195.
Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.001.
Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., & Elsley, J. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(2), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.2.279.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.
Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022853.
Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one’s actions. Acta Psychologica, 101(2–3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00010-4.
Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (2002). Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 40(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00068-9.
Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2001). Response execution and inhibition in children with AD/HD and other disruptive disorders: The role of behavioural activation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00728.
Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527.
Shulman, G. L., Astafiev, S. V., Franke, D., Pope, D. L. W., Abraham, Z., Mcavoy, M. P., & Corbetta, M. (2009). Interaction of stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal fronto-parietal and basal ganglia-cortical networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(14), 4392–4407. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5609-08.2009.Interaction.
Sylwan, R. P. (2004). The control of deliberate waiting strategies in a stop-signal task. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37(6), 853–862. doi:/S0100-879X2004000600011.
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006.
van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003.
Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science, 24(3), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457390.
Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003.
Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Szmalec, A., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter? Experimental Psychology, 52(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.125.
Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011.
Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500151386.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014.
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.479.
Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behavior change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614526414.
Verbruggen, F., Stevens, T., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: An attentional account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036542.
Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2013). Dorsal and ventral attention systems: Distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. The Neuroscientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413494269. July .
Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2013). Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(47), 18481–18491. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3456-13.2013.
Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2017). On the globality of motor suppression: Unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition. Neuron, 93, 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013.
Wessel, J. R., Jenkinson, N., Brittain, J. S., Voets, S. H. E. M., Aziz, T. Z., & Aron, A. R. (2016). Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism. Nature Communications. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11195.
Wessel, J. R., Reynoso, H. S., & Aron, A. R. (2013). Saccade suppression exerts global effects on the motor system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(4), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00229.2013.
Wessel, J. R., Tonnesen, A. L., & Aron, A. R. (2015). Stimulus devaluation induced by action stopping is greater for explicit value representations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01640.
Funding
No funding was associated with this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilt, P.M., Cardellicchio, P. Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?. Psychological Research 84, 276–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3