Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Movement Disorders Society criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease dementia: their usefulness and limitations in elderly patients

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD) in the elderly, and also to evaluate the relevance of applying other tests in this patient population. The MDS criteria include a first short part in checklist form, and a second part which is used as a basis for reference and consists of an in-depth neuropsychological examination. Forty consecutive PD patients presenting with cognitive complaints were enrolled. An assessment was made of the performances of the MDS checklist compared with the MDS exhaustive cognitive examination which was used as a basis for reference, and with other cognitive tests including the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), the French version of the Grober and Buschke test, the verbal fluency test, the Rey–Osterreith complex figure and the paced auditory serial addition test. Out of a total of 40 PD subjects (mean age: 80.5 ± 4.9 years), 20 were diagnosed with PDD according to the checklist and 31 on the basis of the exhaustive examination, i.e. with 11 more patients diagnosed via the latter. The sensitivity of the checklist for the diagnosis of PDD was 0.64, with a specificity of 1.00. The use of the MDRS for PDD diagnosis with a cut-off at ≤120 showed a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 1.00, while at ≤132 it displayed a sensitivity of 1.00 and a specificity of 0.444. The specificity of the checklist for the diagnosis of PDD in the elderly was confirmed, but it was lacking in sensitivity. It was also found that the MDRS could be helpful in the diagnosis and screening of PDD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Rijk MC, Launer LJ, Berger K, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Balderesch M, Fratiglioni L, Lobo A, Martinez-Lage J, Trenkwalder C, Hofman A (2000) Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic diseases in the Elderly Research Group. Neurology 54:S21–S23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Athey RJ, Porter RW, Walker RW (2005) Cognitive assessment of a representative community population with Parkinson’s disease (PD) using the Cambridge Cognitive Assessment-Revised (CAMCOG-R). Age Ageing 34(3):268–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Lau LM, Schipper CM, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM (2005) Prognosis of Parkinson disease: risk of dementia and mortality: the Rotterdam study. Arch Neurol 62(8):1265–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hobson P, Meara J (2004) Risk and incidence of dementia in a cohort of older subjects with Parkinson’s disease in the United Kingdom. Mov Disord 19:1043–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aarsland D, Zaccai J, Brayne C (2005) A systematic review of prevalence studies of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 20(10):1255–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Kragh-Sørensen P (2003) Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective study. Arch Neurol 60:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galvin JE, Pollack J, Morris JC (2006) Clinical phenotype of Parkinson disease dementia. Neurology 67:1605–1611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hely MA, Reid WGJ, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JGL (2008) The Sydney Multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 23:837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stern Y, Richards M, Sano M, Mayeux R (1993) Comparison of cognitive changes in patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 50:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R et al (2007) Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 22:1689–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois B, Burn D, Goetz C et al (2007) Diagnostic procedures for Parkinson’s disease dementia: recommendations from the Movement Disorder Society Task Force. Mov Disord 22:2314–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinic-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dujardin K, Duhamel A, Delliaux M, Thomas-Anterion C, Destée A, Defebvre L (2010) Cognitive complaints in Parkinson’s disease: its relationship with objective cognitive decline. J Neurol 257:79–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danzinger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140:566–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris JC (1993) The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43:2412–2414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams MM, Roe CM, Morris JC (2009) Stability of the Clinical Dementia Rating: 1979–2007. Arch Neurol 66(6):773–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) ‘‘Mini-mental state’’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald WM, Holtzheimer PE, Haber M, Vitek JL, McWhorter K, Delong M (2006) Validity of the 30-item geriatric depression scale in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 21:1618–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrag A, Barone P, Brown RG et al (2007) Depression rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 22(8):1077–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cardebat D, Doyon B, Puel M, Goulet P, Joanette Y (1990) Formal and semantic lexical evocation in normal subjects. Performance and dynamics of production as a function of sex, age and educational level. Acta Neurol Belg 90(4):207–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Godefroy O, ‘Groupe de Reflexion sur l’Evaluation des Fonctions Executives’ (2008) Fonctions executives et pathologies neurologiques et psychiatriques. Solal, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenthal E, Brennan L, Xie S, Hurtig H, Milber J, Weintraub D, Karlawish J, Siderowf A (2010) Association between cognition and function in patients with Parkinson disease with and without dementia. Mov Disord 25(9):1170–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fahn S, Elton RL, The UPDRS Development Committee (1987) Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne D, Goldstein M (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Macmillan Health Care Information, Florham Park, pp 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mattis S (1976) Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. In: Bellak L, Karasy T (eds) Geriatric psychiatry. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 77–121

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mattis S (1988) Dementia rating scale: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown GG, Rahill AA, Gorell JM, McDonald C, Brown SJ, Sillanpaa M et al (1999) Validity of the dementia rating scale in assessing cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 12(4):180–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Llebaria G, Pagonobarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Garcia-Sanchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A, Martinez-Corral M (2008) Cut-off score of the Mattis dementia rating scale for screening dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 23:1546–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Machulda MM, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Ferman TJ, Boeve BF, Knopman D et al (2007) Mayo’s older Americans normative studies: visual form discrimination and copy trial of the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 29:377–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van der Linden M, Coyette F, Poitrenaud J, et al (2004) L’épreuve de rappel libre/rappel indice′ à 16 items (RL/RI-16). In: Van der Linden M, Grenem (eds) L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. Marseille, Solal, pp 25–47.

  31. Gronwall C (1977) Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 44:367–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Naeagele B, Mazza S. Paced auditory serial-addition task: version française dite modifiée. Editions Solal.

  33. Wancata J, Alexandrowicz R, Marquart B, Weiss M, Friedrich F (2006) The criterion validity of the geriatric depression scale: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 114:398–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Conseil General du Bas-Rhin/Departmental Council of the Lower Rhine. Diagnostic départemental: les seniors. Pôle aide à la personne. 2007; http://www.bas-rhin.fr

  35. Riedel O, Klotsche J, Spottke A, Deuschl G, Förstl H, Henn F, Heuser I, Oertel W, Reichmann H, Riederer P, Trenkwalder C, Dodel R, Wittchen H-U (2008) Cognitive impairment in 873 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Results from the German Study on Epidemiology of Parkinson’s Disease with Dementia (GEPAD). J Neurol 255:255–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Ferreira Braga da Costa A-S, Kronenbürger M et al (2011) Parkinson’s disease and dementia. A longitudinal study (DEMPARK). Neuroepidemiology 37:168–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barton B, Grabli D, Bernard B, Czernecki V, Goldman JG, Stebbins G, Dubois B, Goetz CG (2012) Clinical validation of Movement Disorder Society : recommended diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease with dementia. Mov Disord 27:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Di Battista ME, Giustini P, Bernardi S, Stirpe P, Vanacore N, Meco G (2011) A simplified algorithm may lead to overestimate dementia in PD. A clinical and epidemiological study using criteria for PD-D proposed by the Movement Disorders Task Force. J Neural Transm 118:1609–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dujardin K, Sockeel P, Delliaux M, Destee A, Defebvre L (2009) Apathy may herald cognitive decline and dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 24:2391–2397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dujardin K, Dubois B, Tison F, Durif F, Bourdeix I, Péré JJ, Duhamel A, Executive study group (2010) Parkinson’s disease dementia can be easily detected in routine clinical practice. Mov Disord 25:2769–2776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Xie SX, Stern MB, Weintraub D (2009) Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology 73:1738–1745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Biundo R, Weis L, Pilleri M, Facchini S, Formento-Dojot P, Vallelunga A, Antonini A (2013) Diagnostic and screening power of neuropsychological testing in detecting mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 120:627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Grober E, Sanders AE, Hall C, Lipton RB (2010) Free and cued selective reminding identifies very mild dementia in primary care. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 24:284–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aarsland D, Kurz MW (2010) The epidemiology of dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Pathol 20(3):633–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Martinez-Martin P, Falup-Pecurariu C, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Serrano-Dueñas M, Carod Artal FJ, Rojo Abuin JM, Aarsland D (2011) Dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease: applying the Movement Disorder Society Task Force criteria. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 17:621–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Matteau E, Dupré N, Langlois M, Provencher P, Simard M (2012) Clinical validity of the Mattis dementia rating scale-2 in Parkinson disease with MCI and dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 25:100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Marilyn Schreier-Audoire for her assistance in translating and copy-editing this article.

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest to report.

Ethical standard

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Strasbourg University Hospital and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Kiesmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiesmann, M., Chanson, JB., Godet, J. et al. The Movement Disorders Society criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease dementia: their usefulness and limitations in elderly patients. J Neurol 260, 2569–2579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7018-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7018-8

Keywords

Navigation