Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the unbound fraction of R- and S-methadone in human brain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the free drug hypothesis, only the unbound fraction (f u ) of a given drug is biologically available in terms of its pharmacologic activity. Methadone shows large interpersonal variation in toxicity. The goal of the work presented here was to examine whether isolating the unbound fraction of the active R-methadone enantiomer from brain matter could be of value as a forensic tool. A method applying equilibrium dialysis to postmortem brain samples was validated and showed good reproducibility for the previously published f u values for eight common drugs (alprazolam, citalopram, codeine, methadone, morphine, diazepam, oxycodone, tramadol), as well as methadone enantiomers. This method was then applied to approximately 50 authentic case samples with R-methadone and S-methadone concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 13 and 0.6 to 6.8 mg/kg, respectively; median f u values (R-and S-methadone) were 3.9 % (range 3.0–5.3 %) and 3.7 % (range 2.9–4.9 %). No overall correlation between the active R-methadone concentration and f u were found. Small but statistically significant differences in median f u for the R-methadone enantiomer were identified between case-categories (i.e., poisoning with multiple drugs, methadone poisoning, and deaths unrelated to methadone), but these are thought to be too low to be of any forensic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eap CB, Buclin T, Baumann P (2002) Interindividual variability of the clinical pharmacokinetics of methadone—implications for the treatment of opioid dependence. Clin Pharmacokinet 41:1153–1193. doi:10.2165/00003088-200241140-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster DJ, Somogyi AA, Dyer KR, White JM, Bochner F (2000) Steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-methadone in methadone maintenance patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50:427–440. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00272.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. de Vos JW, Ufkes JG, Kaplan CD, Tursch M, Krause JK, van Wilgenburg H, Woodcock BG, Staib AH (1998) L-Methadone and D, L-methadone in methadone maintenance treatment: a comparison of therapeutic effectiveness and plasma concentrations. Eur Addict Res 4:134–141. doi:10.1159/000018936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristensen K, Christensen CB, Christrup LL (1994) The mu1, mu2, delta, kappa opioid receptor binding profiles of methadone stereoisomers and morphine. Life Sci 56:45–50. doi:10.1016/0024-3205(94)00426-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stimpfl T (2008) Drugs-of-abuse testing in brain. In: Jenkins AJ (ed) Drug testing in alternate biological specimens, 1st edn. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 157–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Li D, Kerns E, Carter G (2008) Strategies to assess blood-brain barrier penetration. Expert Opin Drug Dis 3:677–687. doi:10.1517/17460441.3.6.677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta A, Chatelain P, Massingham R, Jonsson EN, Hammarlund-Udenaes M (2006) Brain distribution of cetirizine enantiomers: comparison of three different tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients: K(p), K(p, u), and K(p, uu). Drug Metab Dispos 34:318–323. doi:10.1124/dmd.105.007211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang JS, Ruan Y, Taylor RM, Donovan JL, Markowitz JS, DeVane CL (2004) Brain penetration of methadone (R)- and (S)-enantiomers is greatly increased by P-glycoprotein deficiency in the blood-brain barrier of Abcb1a gene knockout mice. Psychopharmacology 173:132–138. doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1718-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diao XX, Zhong K, Li XL, Zhong DF, Chen XY (2015) Isomer-selective distribution of 3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) hydroxylated metabolites, 3-hydroxy-NBP and 10-hydroxy-NBP, across the rat blood-brain barrier. Acta Pharmacol Sin 36:1520–1527. doi:10.1038/aps.2015.64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Polli JW, Baughman TM, Humphreys JE, Jordan KH, Mote AL, Salisbury JA, Tippin TK, Serabjit-Singh CJ (2003) P-glycoprotein influences the brain concentrations of cetirizine (Zyrtec), a second-generation non-sedating antihistamine. J Pharm Sci 92:2082–2089. doi:10.1002/jps.10453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu SJ, Roerig DL, Wang RIH (1983) Brain and plasma-levels of methadone and their relationships to analgesic activity of methadone in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 11:335–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boulton DW, Arnaud P, DeVane CL (2001) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methadone enantiomers after a single oral dose of racemate. Clin Pharmacol Ther 70:48–57. doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.116793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baselt RC, Bickel MH (1973) Biliary excretion of methadone by the rat: identification of a para-hydroxylated major metabolite. Biochem Pharmacol 22:3117–3120. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90199-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez-Rosas ME, Medrano JG, Epstein DH, Moolchan ET, Preston KL, Wainer IW (2005) Determination of total and free concentrations of the enantiomers of methadone and its metabolite (2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenyl-pyrrolidine) in human plasma by enantioselective liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A 1073:237–248. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Romach MK, Piafsky KM, Abel JG, Khouw V, Sellers EM (1981) Methadone binding to orosomucoid (alpha 1-acid glycoprotein): determinant of free fraction in plasma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29:211–217. doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eap CB, Cuendet C, Baumann P (1990) Binding of d-methadone, l-methadone, and dl-methadone to proteins in plasma of healthy volunteers: role of the variants of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47:338–346. doi:10.1038/clpt.1990.37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crettol S, Digon P, Golay KP, Brawand M, Eap CB (2007) In vitro P-glycoprotein-mediated transport of (R)-, (S)-, (R, S)-methadone, LAAM and their main metabolites. Pharmacology 80:304–311. doi:10.1159/000107104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehotay DC, George S, Etter ML, Graybiel K, Eichhorst JC, Fern B, Wildenboer W, Selby P, Kapur B (2005) Free and bound enantiomers of methadone and its metabolite, EDDP in methadone maintenance treatment: relationship to dosage? Clin Biochem 38:1088–1094. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.09.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen MK, Johansen SS, Linnet K (2013) Evaluation of metabolite/drug ratios in blood and urine as a tool for confirmation of a reduced tolerance in methadone-related deaths in Denmark. Drug Alcohol Depend 133:447–451. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.07.00

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm KM, Linnet K (2015) Distribution of enantiomers of methadone and its main metabolite EDDP in human tissues and blood of postmortem cases. J Forensic Sci 60:95–101. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Holm KM, Linnet K (2012) Chiral analysis of methadone and its main metabolite, EDDP, in postmortem brain and blood by automated SPE and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 36:487–496. doi:10.1093/jat/bks057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diao X, Ma Z, Lei P, Zhong D, Zhang Y, Chen X (2013) Enantioselective determination of 3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) in human plasma by liquid chromatography on a teicoplanin-based chiral column coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 939:67–72. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.09.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou T, Zeng J, Liu S, Zhao T, Wu J, Lai W, He M, Xu B, Qu S, Xu L, Tan W (2015) Study on the determination and chiral inversion of R-salbutamol in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 1002:218–227. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.08.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali I, Alam SD, Al-Othman ZA, Farooqi JA (2013) Recent advances in SPE-chiral-HPLC methods for enantiomeric separation of chiral drugs in biological samples. J Chromatogr Sci 51:645–654. doi:10.1093/chromsci/bms262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu K, Zhong D, Chen X (2009) Enantioselective quantification of chiral drugs in human plasma with LC-MS/MS. Bioanalysis 1:561–576. doi:10.4155/bio.09.31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasmussen LB, Olsen KH, Johansen SS (2006) Chiral separation and quantification of R/S-amphetamine, R/S-methamphetamine, R/S-MDA, R/S-MDMA, and R/S-MDEA in whole blood by GC-EI-MS. J Chromatogr B 842:136–141. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.05.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wan H, Rehngren M, Giordanetto F, Bergstrom F, Tunek A (2007) High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery. J Med Chem 50:4606–4615. doi:10.1021/jm070375w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalvass JC, Maurer TS, Pollack GM (2007) Use of plasma and brain unbound fractions to assess the extent of brain distribution of 34 drugs: comparison of unbound concentration ratios to in vivo p-glycoprotein efflux ratios. Drug Metab Dispos 35:660–666. doi:10.1124/dmd.106.012294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Watson J, Wright S, Lucas A, Clarke KL, Viggers J, Cheetham S, Jeffrey P, Porter R, Read KD (2009) Receptor occupancy and brain free fraction. Drug Metab Dispos 37:753–760. doi:10.1124/dmd.108.022814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Summerfield SG, Stevens AJ, Cutler L, del Carmen OM, Hammond B, Tang SP, Hersey A, Spalding DJ, Jeffrey P (2006) Improving the in vitro prediction of in vivo central nervous system penetration: integrating permeability, P-glycoprotein efflux, and free fractions in blood and brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316:1282–1290. doi:10.1124/jpet.105.092916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu X, Van NK, Yeo H, Vilenski O, Weller PE, Worboys PD, Monshouwer M (2009) Unbound drug concentration in brain homogenate and cerebral spinal fluid at steady state as a surrogate for unbound concentration in brain interstitial fluid. Drug Metab Dispos 37:787–793. doi:10.1124/dmd.108.024125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Longhi R, Corbioli S, Fontana S, Vinco F, Braggio S, Helmdach L, Schiller J, Boriss H (2011) Brain tissue binding of drugs: evaluation and validation of solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles (TRANSIL) as a novel high-throughput method. Drug Metab Dispos 39:312–321. doi:10.1124/dmd.110.036095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Banker MJ, Clark TH, Williams JA (2003) Development and validation of a 96-well equilibrium dialysis apparatus for measuring plasma protein binding. J Pharm Sci 92:967–974. doi:10.1002/jps.10332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kariv I, Cao H, Oldenburg KR (2001) Development of a high throughput equilibrium dialysis method. J Pharm Sci 90:580–587. doi:10.1002/1520-6017(200105)90:5<580::AID-JPS1014>3.0.CO;2-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Ruterbories KJ, Ajamie RT, Wickremsinhe ER, Pothuri L, Rao MV, Basavanakatti VN, Pinjari J, Ramanathan VK, Chaudhary AK (2011) Validation of 96-well equilibrium dialysis with non-radiolabeled drug for definitive measurement of protein binding and application to clinical development of highly-bound drugs. J Pharm Sci 100:2498–2507. doi:10.1002/jps.22452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bjork MK, Simonsen KW, Andersen DW, Dalsgaard PW, Sigurethardottir SR, Linnet K, Rasmussen BS (2013) Quantification of 31 illicit and medicinal drugs and metabolites in whole blood by fully automated solid-phase extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:2607–2617. doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6670-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kalvass JC, Maurer TS (2002) Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery. Biopharm Drug Dispos 23:327–338. doi:10.1002/bdd.325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fridén M, Bergstrom F, Wan H, Rehngren M, Ahlin G, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Bredberg U (2011) Measurement of unbound drug exposure in brain: modeling of pH partitioning explains diverging results between the brain slice and brain homogenate methods. Drug Metab Dispos 39:353–362. doi:10.1124/dmd.110.035998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Summerfield SG, Lucas AJ, Porter RA, Jeffrey P, Gunn RN, Read KR, Stevens AJ, Metcalf AC, Osuna MC, Kilford PJ, Passchier J, Ruffo AD (2008) Toward an improved prediction of human in vivo brain penetration. Xenobiotica 38:1518–1535. doi:10.1080/00498250802499459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Di L, Umland JP, Chang G, Huang Y, Lin Z, Scott DO, Troutman MD, Liston TE (2011) Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates. Drug Metab Dispos 39:1270–1277. doi:10.1124/dmd.111.038778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gertz M, Kilford PJ, Houston JB, Galetin A (2008) Drug lipophilicity and microsomal protein concentration as determinants in the prediction of the fraction unbound in microsomal incubations. Drug Metab Dispos 36:535–542. doi:10.1124/dmd.107.018713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Bente Jensen at H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, for giving a hands-on introduction to the applied dialysis principle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. D. Holm.

Ethics declarations

Formal consent was not required for this category of study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holm, K.M.D., Linnet, K. Determination of the unbound fraction of R- and S-methadone in human brain. Int J Legal Med 130, 1519–1526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1365-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1365-9

Keywords

Navigation