Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) in patients over 60 on speech perception and quality of life, comparing the results obtained with a control group of younger CI recipients. Twenty CI users (mean age 72 years), postlingually deafened, were included in this study. Audiological performance was evaluated using bisyllabic words and sentences recognition tests in a quiet and a noise environment. Moreover, we administered two questionnaires to evaluate the health status (SF-36), CI-related effects on daily activities and personal satisfaction (Questionnaire for self-evaluation of CI benefit with SADL scale modification). Performance measures of the geriatric population showed a significant benefit on speech recognition tests compared to pre-implantation condition, even if younger CI users scored significantly better in both bisyllabic words and sentences recognition test. All study patients reported being able to have a normal conversation with an acquaintance. No significant difference was found between the study and control group in physical and mental health status, conversation with an outsider, use of TV and phone. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noticed, instead, between elderly and younger adult patients about the overall satisfaction derived from CI. Our findings confirm the indisputable utility of CI and provide evidence that elderly patients derive a substantial benefit from it on quality of life, as demonstrated by health status, success in the common activities of daily living and perceived satisfaction after this procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13(44):1–330
Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2010) Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults. Clin Otolaryngol 35(2):87–96
Scorpecci A, Zagari F, Mari G, Giannantonio S, D’Alatri L, Di Nardo W, Paludetti G (2012) Investigation on the music perception skills of Italian children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(10):1507–1514. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.005
Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(1):27–39
Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, Sydlowski SA (2010) Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 31(2):186–194
Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH et al (2010) Cochlear Implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1343–1349
Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Ng ES et al (2002) Reduced hearing, ownership, and use of hearing aids in elderly people in the UK—the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 359(9316):1466–1470
Hogan A, O’Loughlin K, Miller P, Kendig H (2009) The health impact of a hearing disability on older people in Australia. J Aging Health 21(8):1098–1111
Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE et al (1990) Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(1):45–50
Lin FR, Metter EJ, O’Brien RJ et al (2011) Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 68(2):214–220
Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16(5):609–615
Labadie RF, Carrasco VN, Gilmer CH, Pillsbury HC 3rd (2000) Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):419–424
Chatelin V, Kim EJ, Driscoll C, Larky J et al (2004) Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 25(3):298–301
Haensel J, Ilgner J, Chen YS, Thuermer C, Westhofen M (2005) Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 125(12):1272–1276
Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH et al (2011) The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(3):446–453. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03310.x
Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L et al (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):299–310
Luxford WM Ad Hoc subcommittee of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (2001) Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(2):125–126
Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL et al (2005) Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 26(2):188–195
Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J (2006) Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(3):267–270
Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N (2009) Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 30(7):921–929
Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2011) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203. doi:10.1002/lary.22356
Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483
Questionnaire for self-assessment of cochlear implant benefit (1996) Acta Phoniatr Latina 18(3)
Cox RM, Alexander GC (1999) Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 20(4):306–320
Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD et al (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(12):1049–1054
Keithley EM, Croskrey KL (1990) Spiral ganglion cell endings in the cochlear nucleus of young and old rats. Hear Res 49(1–3):169–177
Bohne BA, Gruner MM, Harding GW (1990) Morphological correlates of aging in the chinchilla cochlea. Hear Res 48(1–2):79–91
Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP (1985) Central presbycusis. Laryngoscope 95(2):128–136
Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 165:31–48
Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765
Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(3):357–362
Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76(4):450–453
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Nardo, W., Anzivino, R., Giannantonio, S. et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 65–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1