Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) in patients over 60 on speech perception and quality of life, comparing the results obtained with a control group of younger CI recipients. Twenty CI users (mean age 72 years), postlingually deafened, were included in this study. Audiological performance was evaluated using bisyllabic words and sentences recognition tests in a quiet and a noise environment. Moreover, we administered two questionnaires to evaluate the health status (SF-36), CI-related effects on daily activities and personal satisfaction (Questionnaire for self-evaluation of CI benefit with SADL scale modification). Performance measures of the geriatric population showed a significant benefit on speech recognition tests compared to pre-implantation condition, even if younger CI users scored significantly better in both bisyllabic words and sentences recognition test. All study patients reported being able to have a normal conversation with an acquaintance. No significant difference was found between the study and control group in physical and mental health status, conversation with an outsider, use of TV and phone. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noticed, instead, between elderly and younger adult patients about the overall satisfaction derived from CI. Our findings confirm the indisputable utility of CI and provide evidence that elderly patients derive a substantial benefit from it on quality of life, as demonstrated by health status, success in the common activities of daily living and perceived satisfaction after this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13(44):1–330

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2010) Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults. Clin Otolaryngol 35(2):87–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scorpecci A, Zagari F, Mari G, Giannantonio S, D’Alatri L, Di Nardo W, Paludetti G (2012) Investigation on the music perception skills of Italian children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(10):1507–1514. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(1):27–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, Sydlowski SA (2010) Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 31(2):186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH et al (2010) Cochlear Implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1343–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Ng ES et al (2002) Reduced hearing, ownership, and use of hearing aids in elderly people in the UK—the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 359(9316):1466–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan A, O’Loughlin K, Miller P, Kendig H (2009) The health impact of a hearing disability on older people in Australia. J Aging Health 21(8):1098–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE et al (1990) Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(1):45–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O’Brien RJ et al (2011) Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 68(2):214–220

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16(5):609–615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Labadie RF, Carrasco VN, Gilmer CH, Pillsbury HC 3rd (2000) Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):419–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatelin V, Kim EJ, Driscoll C, Larky J et al (2004) Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 25(3):298–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haensel J, Ilgner J, Chen YS, Thuermer C, Westhofen M (2005) Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 125(12):1272–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH et al (2011) The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(3):446–453. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03310.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L et al (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):299–310

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luxford WM Ad Hoc subcommittee of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (2001) Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(2):125–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL et al (2005) Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 26(2):188–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J (2006) Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(3):267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N (2009) Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 30(7):921–929

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2011) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203. doi:10.1002/lary.22356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Questionnaire for self-assessment of cochlear implant benefit (1996) Acta Phoniatr Latina 18(3)

  25. Cox RM, Alexander GC (1999) Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 20(4):306–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD et al (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(12):1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Keithley EM, Croskrey KL (1990) Spiral ganglion cell endings in the cochlear nucleus of young and old rats. Hear Res 49(1–3):169–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bohne BA, Gruner MM, Harding GW (1990) Morphological correlates of aging in the chinchilla cochlea. Hear Res 48(1–2):79–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP (1985) Central presbycusis. Laryngoscope 95(2):128–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 165:31–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(3):357–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76(4):450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Giannantonio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Nardo, W., Anzivino, R., Giannantonio, S. et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 65–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1

Keywords

Navigation