Skip to main content
Log in

Can adnexal torsion be predicted by measuring plasma heat shock protein 70 level? An experimental study

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of adnexal torsion on the plasma heat shock protein 70 level and to determine whether plasma heat shock protein 70 can be used in the adnexal torsion diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one nulligravid 3-month-old female Wistar albino rats were randomly and equally allocated into three groups: study group (ovarian torsion) (n = 7), laparotomy group (sham operation) (n = 7) and control group (received no special treatment) (n = 7). Ovarian torsion model was created by twisting the right adnexa two times around its pedicle and fixing over the lateral pelvis with 6.0 polyglactin absorbable surgical suture. Blood was sampled before and 12 h after operation to assess plasma heat shock protein 70 level.

Results

In the study group, the mean plasma heat shock protein 70 level was significantly higher than that in the laparotomy and control groups (1.75 ± 0.25), (1.16 ± 0.99), (1.19 ± 0.11) ng/ml, respectively, P = 0.001), following 12 h of ovarian torsion.

Conclusion

A significant increase in plasma heat shock protein 70 level in the study group indicates that plasma heat shock protein 70 level could be used as a serum marker in the early detection of adnexal torsion. However, further clinical and experimental studies of a larger size are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anteby SO, Schenker JG, Polishuk WZ (1974) The value of laparoscopy in acute pelvicpain. Ann Surg 181:484–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hibbard LT (1985) Adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:456–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huchon C, Fauconnier A (2010) Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White M, Stella J (2005) Ovarian torsion: 10-year perspective. Emerg Med Australas 17:231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bayer AI, Wiskind AK (1994) Adnexal torsion: can the adnexa be saved. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1506–1511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols DH, Julian PJ (1985) Torsion of the adnexa. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28(375–80):7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS (2000) Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics 28:1355–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graif M, Itzchak Y (1988) Sonographic evaluation of ovarian torsion in childhood and adolescence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(3):647–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pena JE, Ufberg D, Cooney N, Denis AL (2000) Usefulness of Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Fertil Steril 73:1047–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurh PJ, Meyer JS, Shaaban A (2002) Ultrasound of a torsed ovary: characteristic gray-scale appearance despite normal arterial and venous flow on Doppler. Pediatr Radiol. 32(8):586–588 (Epub 2002 May 25)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman BC, Morimoto RI (1996) The human cytosolic molecular chaperones hsp90, hsp70 (hsc70) and hdj-1 have distinct roles in recognition of a non-native protein and protein refolding. EMBO J 15:2969–2979

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindquist S (1986) The heat-shock response. Annu Rev Biochem 55:1151–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iadecola C, Alexander M (2001) Cerebral ischemia and inflammation. Curr Opin Neurol 14:89–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mattson MP (2006) Neuronal life-and-death signaling, apoptosis, and neurodegenerative disorders. Antioxid Redox Signal 8:1997–2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS (2002) Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11:1531–1543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Soussi T (2007) Alterations in human cancer: more questions than answers. Oncogene 26:2145–2156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nayak Rao S (2016) The role of heat shock proteins in kidney disease. J Transl Int Med 4(3):114–117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lackie RE, Maciejewski A, Ostapchenko VG, Marques-Lopes J, Choy WY, Duennwald ML, Prado VF, Prado MAM (2017) The Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Neurosci 11:254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayer MP, Bukau B (2005) Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:670–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalmar B, Greensmith L (2009) Induction of heat shock proteins for protection against oxidative stress. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:310–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chow SC, Liu JP (1998) Design and analysis of clinical trials. Wile-Interscience Publication, New York, pp 523–524

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bortz J, Lienert GA (2008) Kurzgefasste Statistik für die klinische Forschung: Leitfaden für die verteilungsfreieAnalyse kleiner Stichproben, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ozcan C, Ergun O, Celik A, Corduk N, Ozok G (2002) Adnexal torsion in children may have arcata strophic sequel: asynchronous bilateral torsion. J Pediatr Surg 37:1617–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen M, Chen CD, Yang YS (2001) Torsion of the previously normal uterine adnexa. Evaluation of the correlation between the pathological changes and the clinical characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:58–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeda A, Manabe S, Hosono S, Nakamura H (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in 12 cases of adnexal disease occurring in girls aged 15 years or younger. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):234–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Filho DW, Torres MA, Bordin AL, Crezcynski-Pasa TB, Boveris A (2004) Spermatic cord torsion, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and ischemia–reperfusion injury. Mol Aspects Med 25(1–2):199–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oelsner G, Bider D, Goldenberg M, Admon D, Mashiach S (1993) Long-term follow-up of the twisted ischemic adnexa managed by detorsion. Fertil Steril 60(6):976–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen SB, Wattiez A, Stockheim D, Seidman DS, Lidor AL, Mashiach S, Goldenberg M (2001) The accuracy of serum interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor as markers for ovarian torsion. Hum Reprod 16:2195–2197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Christopoulos G, Goubet S, Kelly T (2013) Interleukin-6 for the diagnosis of ovarian torsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol 33:438–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aran T, Guven S, Unsal MA, Alver A, Mentese A, Yulug E (2010) Serum ischemia-modified albumin as a novel marker of ovarian torsion: an experimental study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:72–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kart C, Aran T, Guven S, Karahan SC, Yulug E (2011) Acute increase in plasma d-dimer level in ovarian torsion: an experimental study. Hum Reprod 26:564–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Daponte A, Pournaras S, Hadjichristodoulou C, Lialios G, Kallitsaris A, Maniatis AN et al (2006) Novel serum inflammatory markers in patients with adnexal mass who had surgery for ovarian torsion. Fertil Steril 85:1469–1472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reed JL, Strait RT, Kachelmeyer AM, Byczkowski TL, Ho ML, Huppert JS (2011) Biomarkers to distinguish surgical etiologies in females with lower quadrant abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med 18:686–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakacak M, Kostu B, Ercan O, Bostancı MS, Kıran G, Aral M, Cıralık H, Serin S (2015) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a novel marker in early diagnosis of ovarian torsion: an experimental study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu X, Zhang C, Zhang C, Li J, Guo W, Yan D, Yang C, Zhao J, Xia T, Wang Y, Xu R, Wu X, Shi J (2016) Heat shock protein 70 inhibits cardiomyocyte necroptosis through repressing autophagy in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 52:690–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HÇ: writing the paper, HÇ and RB: concept and design, MŞ: supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Çılgın.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local Ethical Review Board of the Firat University Medical Faculty Elazıg, Turkey, for the use of laboratory animals, and was performed at the experimental surgery training and education center of the same hospital (On 13.08.2016, the ethics committee was approved with the number 58). All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Funding

This study was not funded by any organization.

Conflict of interest

All the authors of this manuscript declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çılgın, H., Şimşek, M. & Bal, R. Can adnexal torsion be predicted by measuring plasma heat shock protein 70 level? An experimental study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 941–946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4502-x

Keywords

Navigation