Skip to main content
Log in

Gestational diabetes in a tertiary care hospital: implications of applying the IADPSG criteria

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The American Diabetes Association has endorsed the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Groups (IADPSG) recommendation that every pregnant woman should undergo the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Purpose

To find the cost and workload implications of switching from the current two-step screening of GDM to the one-step IADPSG approach.

Methods

The cost (US $) and laboratory workload units (WLU) were calculated for three possible strategies: (1) 50 g glucose screen, if positive, followed by the 100 g OGTT; (2) universal 75 g OGTT; and (3) screening with the initial fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT.

Results

For the 1,101 pregnant women screened in 1 year, the cost of the three strategies was $ 31,985, $ 55,250 and $ 35,875, respectively; the laboratory burden was 28,975 WLU, 18,662 WLU and 12,215 WLU, respectively.

Conclusions

Switching to the one-step, strategy 2 (IADPSG) would increase the cost by 42 % but decrease the laboratory workload by 36 % compared to the two-step, strategy 1. However, an initial screen by the fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT is the ideal strategy, both in terms of cost and laboratory workload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal MM (2010) Evolution of screening and diagnostic criteria for GDM worldwide. In: Kim C, Ferrara A (eds) Gestational diabetes during and after pregnancy. Dordrecht, New York, pp 35–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (2010) Recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 34:e102

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (2011) Position statement American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 33(Suppl 1):S62–S69

    Google Scholar 

  4. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358:1991–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2004) Position statement American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 27(Suppl 1):S88–S90

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes e-Atlas, 4th edn, Brussels, 2009. http://www.eatlas.idf.org. Accessed 21 Dec 2011

  7. Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Punnose J, Koster G (2005) Gestational diabetes: dilemma caused by multiple international diagnostic criteria. Diabet Med 22:1731–1736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Shah SM (2010) Gestational diabetes: simplifying the IADPSG diagnostic algorithm using fasting plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 33:2018–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, Maclaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M (2002) Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 48:436–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Canadian Diabetes Association (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Can J Diabetes 32(Suppl 1):S1–S201

    Google Scholar 

  11. Canadian Institute for Health Information. http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/internet/en/Document/standards+and+data+submission/standards/mis+standards/MIS_FAQ. Accessed 21 Mar 2012

  12. Agarwal MM, Weigl B, Hod M (2011) Gestational diabetes screening: the low-cost algorithm. Int J Gynecol Obstet 115(Suppl 1):S30–S33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meltzer S, Snyder J, Penrod J, Nudi M, Morin L (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis: a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing costs of one‐step and two‐step methods. BJOG 117:407–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholson WK, Fleisher LA, Fox HE, Powe NR (2005) Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of four screening strategies. Diabetes Care 28:1482–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavin JP Jr, Lavin B, O’Donnell N (2001) A comparison of costs associated with screening for gestational diabetes with two-tiered and one-tiered testing protocols. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poncet B, Touzet S, Rocher L, Berland M, Orgiazzi J, Colin C (2002) Cost-effectiveness analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus screening in France. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 103:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Nothing to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh M. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, M.M., Dhatt, G.S. & Othman, Y. Gestational diabetes in a tertiary care hospital: implications of applying the IADPSG criteria. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 373–378 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2324-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2324-4

Keywords

Navigation