Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the histology of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) surgical tissues of patients with ASC-H and post-LEEP recurrence.
Methods
Medical records of patients with ASC-H treated with LEEP between January 2004 and March 2008 in the town of União da Vitória, Paraná, seat of the Sixth Public Health Region of Paraná (CISVALI), were evaluated. The LEEP was carried out solely for ASC-H immediately after colposcopy, but without a histological diagnosis.
Results
Most patients were less than 40 years old (71.1%), with the largest group 20–39 years old (p < 0.0001). Twenty-eight patients (73.3%) showed histological lesions. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) I was present in 7 (18.4%), CIN II and CIN III in 9 (23.7%) each, microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCMCA) in 2 (5.3%), and SCMCA plus in situ adenocarcinoma in 1 (2.2%). In 32 patients (84.2%), there was no involvement of the margins, including 100% with no dysplasia histology and CIN I, 80.0% of those with CIN II, and 88.9% of those with CIN III. Two patients (5.3%) had endocervical involvement, all of them with CIN II. Four patients (10.5%) had ectocervical and endocervical involvement, one of them with CIN III, and three of them with carcinomas. All patients with follow-up (+) were ASC-US, with no patients with dysplasia or CIN I.
Conclusions
A very high portion of the women with ASC-H had lesions on post-LEEP histological examination, principally CIN II and III. These data show the benefits of treatment for ASC-H by LEEP immediately after colposcopy but without any previous histology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
INCA-National Institute of the Câncer/Brazil (Instituto Nacional do Câncer). Estimativa de câncer no Brasil para 2007. http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2010. Accessed in 30 June 2010
Baloglu A, Uysal D, Bezircioglu I, Bicer M, Inci A (2009) Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatemet in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:69–73
Fregnani JHTG, Soares FA, Novik PR, Lopes A, Latorre MRDO (2007) Intensity of cervical inflammatory reaction as a risk factor for recurrence of carcinoma of the uterine cervix in stages IB and IIA. J Med São Paulo 25:231–236
Brasil-Ministério da Saúde (2006) Nomenclatura brasileira para laudos cervicais e condutas preconizadas: recomendações para profissionais da saúde. Rev Bras Cancerol 52:213–236
Solomon D, Nayar R (2005) Sistema Bethesda para citopatologia cervicovaginal: definições, critérios e notas explicativas, 2a edn. Rio de Janeiro, Revinter, pp 67–87
Lima DNO, Câmara S, Mattos MGG, Ramalho R (2002) Diagnóstico citológico de Ascus: sua importância na conduta clínica. J Bras Patol Med Labor 38:45–49
Cardoso MS, Ribalta JCL, Taha NSA, Focchi J, Baracat EC, Lima GR (2001) Resultado da cirurgia com alça de alta freqüência e localização colposcópica da área com atipia ectocervical. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 23:349–354
Juliato CRT, Teixeira JC, Derchain SFM, Barbosa SR, Martinez CZ, Panetta K, Andrade LAA (2000) Correlação entre o diagnóstico histológico da biópsia e o da conização por cirurgia de alta freqüência por alça (CAF) no tratamento da neoplasia intra-epitelial cervical. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 22:65–70
Szurkus DC, Harrison TA (2003) Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1180–1182
Kietpeerakool C, Cheewakriangkrai C, Suprasert P, Srisomboo J (2009) Feasibility of the “see and treat” approach in management of women with “atypical squamous cell, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion” smear. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35:507–513
Scheungraber C, Kleekamp N, Schneider A (2004) Management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Br J Cancer 90:975–978
Lindeque BG (2005) Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19:545–561
Maeda MYS, di Loreto S, Barreto E, Cavaliere MJ, Utagawa MariaLucia, Sakai YI et al (2004) SISCOLO-quality control system in the health public laboratories: preliminary study. J Bras Patol Med Lab 40:425–429
Szurkus DC, Harrison TA (2003) Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1180–1182
Huitron S, Bonvicino A, Fadare O (2008) Patients with negative cervical biopsies after Papanicolaou test interpretations of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: comparative longitudinal follow-up. Ann Diagn Pathol 12:187–190
Sherman ME, Castle PE, Solomon D (2006) Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)-characteristics and histologic outcomes. Cancer cytopathol 108:298–305
Howells REJ, O′Mahony F, Tucker H, Millinship J, Jones PW, Redman CWE (2000) How can the frequency of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 107:1075–1082
Simsir A, Ioffe O, Sun P, Elgert P, Cangiarella J, Levine PH (2006) Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells—cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H). Diagn Cytopathol 34:62–66
McHale MT, Souther J, Elkas JC, Monk BJ, Harrison TA (2007) Is atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion clinically significant? J Low Genit Tract Dis 1:86–89
Alli PM, Ali SZ (2003) Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance—rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytopathologic characteristics and clinical correlates. Diagn Cytopathol 28:308–312
Dietrich CS, Yancey MK, Miyazawa K, Williams DL, Farley J (2002) Risk factors for early cytologic abnormalities after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 99:188–192
Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D (2003) Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106:214–218
Kim HJ, Kim KR, Mok JE, Nam JH, Kim YT, Kim YM, Kim JH, Yun SC (2007) Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization. Gynecol Oncol 105:434–438
Archarya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Sorhein N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau JM (2005) Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272:109–112
Raio L, Ghezze F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Lüscher KP (1997) Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 90:978–982
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nogara, P.R.B., Manfroni, L.A.R. & Consolaro, M.E.L. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): histological results and recurrence after a loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 965–971 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1731-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1731-7