Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome after open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: preliminary results with the LCP distal humerus system

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fractures of the distal humerus are complex injuries that can be effectively treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The new LCP distal humerus system allows angular stable fixation of these complex fractures with anatomically preshaped plates. The aim of the study was to evaluate operative reposition, fracture healing, and pain, function and patient satisfaction after open reduction with an angular stable fixation.

Methods

Fourteen patients with a mean age of 55.2 years (21–83) were treated with open reduction and angular stable internal fixation. Two patients were lost to follow up (1 died, one refused to be reevaluated). AO classification showed 12 C-fractures (1 × C 1.1; 1 × C 1.3; 4 × C 2.2; 4 × C 3.2; 2 × C 3.3) and 2 B-fracture (B 2.3 and B 3.3). 5 fractures were open fractures (4 × II°, 1 × I°). The clinical and radiographic follow up (Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), Dash Score, elbow anterior–posterior and lateral view X-rays, and flexion and extension force as % of contralateral side at 90° flexion) were performed postoperatively. Mean follow up was 10 months.

Results

Radiographically, complete union was achieved in all patients. There were no cases of primary malposition or secondary dislocation. Complications were: (1) delayed union after olecranon osteotomy, (2) transient ulnar nerve irritation. Clinical MEPS results were good to excellent with a mean of 91 ± 11.7 points. The mean DASH Score was 18.5 ± 11.5 points. Mean flexion was 121 ± 20.9, mean extension deficit was 17.9° ± 10.3. Mean flexion force was 75.3% ± 26.7 and mean extension force was 70.7 % ± 24.9.

Conclusion

Treatment of supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus is challenging. Anatomically preshaped angular stable implants facilitate operative reduction and stabilization of the fracture and may allow early postoperative rehabilitation. Clinical and radiological results are promising, with good range of motion and flexion and extension force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown RF, Morgan RG (1971) Intercondylar T-shaped fractures of the humerus. Results in ten cases treated by early mobilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53:425–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Horne G (1980) Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in adults. J Trauma 20:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Imatani J, Ogura T, Morito Y, Hashizume H, Inoue H (2005) Custom AO small T plate for transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:611–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. John H, Rosso R, Neff U, Bodoky A, Regazzoni P, Harder F (1993) Distal humerus fractures in patients over 75 years of age. Long-term results of osteosynthesis. Helv Chir Acta 60:219–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. John H, Rosso R, Neff U, Bodoky A, Regazzoni P, Harder F (1994) Operative treatment of distal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:793–796

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jupiter JB (1995) Complex fractures of the distal part of the humerus and associated complications. Instr Course Lect 44:187–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgower M (1985) Intercondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:226–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keon-Cohen BT (1966) Fractures at the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48:1623–1639

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, Lill H, Josten C, Schneider E, Linke B (2004) A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma 18:286–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, Hessmann M, Kopf K, Goldhahn J, Gonschorek O, Josten C, Rommens PM (2005) Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S73–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, Rommens PM, Schneider E, Linke B (2003) The LCP-concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures-biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B20–B30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Letsch R, Schmit-Neuerburg KP, Sturmer KM, Walz M (1989) Intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. Surgical treatment and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res:238–244

  13. Miller WE (1964) Comminuted fractures of the distal end of the humerus in the adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:644–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrey BF (1993) Fractures and dislocations. In: Morrey BF (ed). The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. WB Sanndess, Philodelphia pp 293–329

  15. O’Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, Cohen MS, Ring D, McKee MD (2003) Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls. Instr Course Lect 52:113–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pajarinen J, Björkenheim JM (2002) Operative treatment of type C intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: results after a mean follow-up of 2 years in a series of 18 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:48–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pereles TR, Koval KJ, Gallagher M, Rosen H (1997) Open reduction and internal fixation of the distal humerus: functional outcome in the elderly. J Trauma 43:578–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ring D, Gulotta L, Roy A, Jupiter JB (2003) Concomitant nonunion of the distal humerus and olecranon. J South Orthop Assoc 12:27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ring D, Jupiter JB (1999) Complex fractures of the distal humerus and their complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:85–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ring D, Jupiter JB (2000) Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am 31:103–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L (2003) Articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:232–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riseborough EJ, Radin EL (1969) Intercondylar T fractures of the humerus in the adult. A comparison of operative and non-operative treatment in twenty-nine cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:130–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sodergard J, Sandelin J, Bostman O (1992) Mechanical failures of internal fixation in T and Y fractures of the distal humerus. J Trauma 33:687–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sodergard J, Sandelin J, Bostman O (1992) Postoperative complications of distal humeral fractures. 27/96 adults followed up for 6 (2–10) years. Acta Orthop Scand 63:85–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Greiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greiner, S., Haas, N.P. & Bail, H.J. Outcome after open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: preliminary results with the LCP distal humerus system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 723–729 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0428-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0428-2

Keywords

Navigation