Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Creation of defunctioning loop ileostomy is a standard procedure in laparoscopic lower rectal surgery. Stoma-related obstruction sometimes occurs, but its cause has not been fully analyzed. This study aims to assess stoma obstructive complications and clarify the risk factors of stoma-related obstructions.

Methods

Two hundred and thirty consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with defunctioning loop ileostomy between April 2007 and December 2017 were recruited, numbering 230. We statistically examined the frequency and risk factor of stoma outlet obstruction.

Results

Postoperative stoma-related complications developed in 41 patients (17.8%) overall, and there was no 30-day mortality. Stoma outlet obstructions occurred in 16 patients (7.0%) during postoperative course. Thick subcutaneous fat at the stoma-marking site (vertical distance ≥ 20 mm) and body mass index (≥ 22.2) were significantly associated with the risk of stoma outlet obstruction in univariate analysis. Thick subcutaneous fat was a significant predictive factor of stoma outlet obstruction according to multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.80).

Conclusions

This report investigates significant predictors of stoma outlet obstruction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery for the first time. In laparoscopic procedure, stoma outlet obstruction should be particularly considered in obese patients who have especially thick subcutaneous fat of the abdominal wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) Defunctioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, Bolognese A, Covarelli P, Boselli C, Becattini C, Noya G (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 24:479–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mala T, Nesbakken A (2008) Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Color Dis 10:785–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chun LJ, Haigh PI, Tam MS, Abbas MA (2012) Defunctioning loop ileostomy for pelvic anastomoses: predictors of morbidity and nonclosure. Dis Colon Rectum 55:167–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T et al (2015) Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 62:602–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Okita Y, Araki T, Kondo S, Fujikawa H, Yoshiyama S, Hiro J, Inoue M, Toiyama Y, Kobayashi M, Ohi M, Inoue Y, Uchida K, Mohri Y, Kusunoki M (2017) Clinical characteristics of stoma-related obstruction after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg 21:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Yau KK, Chung CC et al (2008) Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1664–1668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Color Dis 6:462–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nurkin S, Kakarla VR, Ruiz DE, Cance WG, Tiszenkel HI (2013) The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma. Color Dis 15:e309–e316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, Kinugasa Y, Ota M, Yamaue H, Shiozawa M, Horie H, Kuriu Y, Saito N (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J et al (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1562–1567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritchie JK (1972) Ulcerative colitis treated by ileostomy and excisional surgery. Br J Surg 59:345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC (1993) Obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a preventable complication? Dis Colon Rectum 36:1105–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors appreciate the staff who are concerned with the surgery and the treatments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: T, M, Y.

Acquisition of data: T, I, M, M, N.

Analysis and interpretation of data: M, Y.

Drafting of manuscript: M, Y.

Critical revision: M, Y.

Supervision: Y.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Yamaue.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

For this retrospective study, the authors receive ethics committee approval of Wakayama Medical University following Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamura, K., Matsuda, K., Yokoyama, S. et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 1141–1145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03308-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03308-z

Keywords

Navigation