Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can we predict pathologic complete response before surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pathologic complete response has been proven to have oncological benefits for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy. The aims of this study are to analyze and determine the factors to predict pathologic complete response for patients treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

Patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced rectal cancer were treated neoadjuvantly followed by radical surgical resection. Tumors were re-assessed after completing chemoradiation, including pelvic magnetic resonance images, colonoscopic examination, and re-biopsy. The results of examination were compared with the final pathologic status.

Results

A retrospective chart review of 166 patients was conducted. Twenty-five patients (15.1%) had pathologic complete response after chemoradiation. The 5-year overall survival rates were better in the complete response group than the residual tumor group (91.1% vs. 70.8%; P = 0.047), and there were also significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival rates between these two groups (91.1% vs. 70.2%; P = 0.027). The prediction rates for pathologic complete response by re-biopsy, magnetic resonance images, and colonoscopy were 21.4%, 33.3%, and 53.8%, respectively. In addition, when we further combine the results of colonoscopic findings and re-biopsy, the prediction rate for pathologic complete response reached 77.8% (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Combining the results of the re-biopsy and post-treatment colonoscopic findings, we can achieve a good prediction rate for pathologic complete response. Post-treatment magnetic resonance images are not useful tools in predicting tumor clearance following chemoradiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan): Cancer Registry Annual Report, Republic of China (Taiwan), 2007. (2010) Taipei: Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan)

  3. Jessup JM, Stewart AK, Menck HR (1998) The National Cancer Database report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985–1995. Cancer 83:2408–2418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vauthey JN, Marsh RW, Zlotecki RA et al (1999) Recent advances in the treatment and outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg 229:745–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luna-Perez P, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Vega J, Sandoval E, Labastida S (2001) Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Rev Invest Clin 53:388–395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Onaitis MW, Noone RB, Hartwig M et al (2001) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer analysis of clinical outcomes for a 13-year institutional experience. Ann Surg 233:778–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grann A, Minsky BD, Cohen AM et al (1997) Preliminary results of preoperative 5-fluorouracial, low-dose leucovorin, and concurrent radiation therapy for clinical resectable T3 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:515–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Enker WE et al (1997) Preoperative 5-FU, low-dose leucovorin, and radiation therapy for locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohiuddin M, Regine WE, John WJ et al (2000) Preoperative chemoradiation in fixed distal rectal cancer: dose time factors for pathological complete response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:883–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L et al (2008) Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo LJ, Liu MC, Jian JJ et al (2007) Is final TNM staging a predictor for survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy? Ann Surg Oncol 14:2766–2772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Theodoropoulos G, Wise WE, Padmanabhan A et al (2002) T-level downstaging and complete pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer results in decreased recurrence and improved disease-free survival. Dis Colon Rectum 45:895–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valentini V, Coco C, Picciocchi A et al (2002) Dose downstaging predict improved outcome after preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal locally advanced rectal cancer? A long-term analysis of 165 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:664–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stipa F, Chessin DB, Shia J et al (2006) A pathologic complete response of rectal cancer to preoperative combined-modality therapy results in improved oncological outcome compared with those who achieve no downstaging on the basis of preoperative endorectal ultrasonography. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1047–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapet O, Romestaing P, Mornex F et al (2005) Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma: which are strong prognostic factors? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Aguilar J, Hernandez de Anda E, Sirivongs P et al (2003) A pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiation is associated with lower local recurrence and improved survival in rectal cancer patients treated by mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 46:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J et al (2005) Clinical examination following preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer is not a reliable surrogate end point. J Clin Oncol 23:3475–3479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiotis SP, Weber SM, Cohen AM et al (2002) Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients. J Am Coll Surg 194:131–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G (1989) Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 170:319–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman S, Arvidsson H, Norming U, Lagerstedt U, Magnusson I, Frisell J (1991) Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 16:259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heriot AG, Grundy A, Kumar D (1999) Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 86:17–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Glaser EF, Schlag P, Herfarth CH (1990) Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumors and lymph node involvement. Br J Surg 77:883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Herzog U, von Flue M, Tondelli P, Schuppisser JP (1993) How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 36:127–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, Sohn SK, Min JS (1999) Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:770–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Park JK, Park SI, Min JS (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness. Ann Surg Oncol 7:732–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gagliardi G, Bayar S, Smith R, Salem RR (2002) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils. Arch Surg 137:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T et al (2003) Comparison between endorectal coil and pelvic phased-array coil magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal tumor. Am J Surg 185:328–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meterissian S, Skibber J, Rich T, Roubein L, Ajani J, Cleary K, Ota DM (1994) Patterns of residual disease after preoperative chemoradiation in ultrasound T3 rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1:111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuo LJ, Chern MC, Tsou MH et al (2005) Interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9068

  33. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscursbim I, Campos FG, Nadalin W, Kiss D, Gama-Rodrigues F (2006) Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1319–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Melton GB, Lavely WC, Jacene HA et al (2007) Efficacy of preoperative combined 18-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for assessing primary rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 11:961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kalff V, Ware R, Heriot A et al (2009) Radiation change do not interfere with postchemoradiation restaging of patients with rectal cancer by FDG PET/CT before curative surgical therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Capirci C, Rampin L, Erba PA et al (2007) Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliable predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1583–1593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vliegen RF, Beets-Tan RG, Vanhauten B et al (2008) Can an FDG-PET/CT predict tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer? Strahlenther Onkol 184:457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Taipei Medical University and Hospital Grant (100TMU-TMUH-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu-Jia Chang or Po-Li Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuo, LJ., Chiou, JF., Tai, CJ. et al. Can we predict pathologic complete response before surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy?. Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 613–621 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1348-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1348-8

Keywords

Navigation