Abstract
The seasonal cycle of water masses and sea ice in the Hudson Bay marine system is examined using a three-dimensional coastal ice-ocean model, with 10 km horizontal resolution and realistic tidal, atmospheric, hydrologic and oceanic forcing. The model includes a level 2.5 turbulent kinetic energy equation, multi-category elastic-viscous-plastic sea-ice rheology, and two layer sea ice with a single snow layer. Results from a two-year long model simulation between August 1996 and July 1998 are analyzed and compared with various observations. The results demonstrate a consistent seasonal cycle in atmosphere-ocean exchanges and the formation and circulation of water masses and sea ice. The model reproduces the summer and winter surface mixed layers, the general cyclonic circulation including the strong coastal current in eastern Hudson Bay, and the inflow of oceanic waters into Hudson Bay. The maximum sea-ice growth rates are found in western Foxe Basin, and in a relatively large and persistent polynya in northwestern Hudson Bay. Sea-ice advection and ridging are more important than local thermodynamic growth in the regions of maximum sea-ice cover concentration and thickness that are found in eastern Foxe Basin and southern Hudson Bay. The estimate of freshwater transport to the Labrador Sea confirms a broad maximum during wintertime that is associated with the previous summer’s freshwater moving through Hudson Strait from southern Hudson Bay. Tidally driven mixing is shown to have a strong effect on the modeled ice-ocean circulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atakturk SS, Katsaros KB (1999) Wind stress and surface waves observed on Lake Washington. J Phys Oceanogr 29:633–650
Backhaus JO (1983) A semi-implicit scheme for the shallow water equations for application to shelf sea modeling. Cont Shelf Res 2: 234–254
Backhaus JO (1985) A three-dimensional model for the simulation of shelf-sea dynamics. Dtsch Hydrogr Z 38:165–187
Barber FG (1965) Current observations in Fury and Hecla Strait. J Fish Res Board Can 22: 225–229
Beckmann A, Timmermann K, Pereira AF, Ohn VM (2001) Sea ice anomalies in the eastern Weddell Sea CLIVAR Exchanges 6: 15–16
Bignami F, Marullo S, Santoreli R, Schiano ME (1995) Longwave radiation budget in the Mediterranean Sea. J Geophys Res 100: 2501–2514
Boer GJ, Flato GM, Ramsden D (2000) A transient climate change simulation with greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: projected climate change in the 21st century. Clim Dyn 16: 427–450
Burchard H, Bolding K (2001) Comparative analysis of four second-moment turbulence closure models for the oceanic mixed layer. J Phys Oceanogr 31: 1943–1968
Canuto VM, Howard A, Cheng Y, Dubovikov MS (2001) Ocean turbulence, I, one-point closure model: momentum and heat vertical diffusivities. J Phys Oceanogr 31: 1413–1426
Charnock H (1955) Wind stress on a water surface. Q J R Meteorol Soc 81: 639–640
CotéJ, Gravel S, Méthot A, Patoine A, Roch M, Staniforth A (1997a) The operational CMC/MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model: Part I - Design considerations and formulation. Mon Weather Rev 126: 1373–1395
CotéJ, Gravel S, Méthot A, Patoine A, Roch M, Staniforth A (1997b) The operational CMC/MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model: Part II – results. Mon Weather Rev 126: 1397–1418
Cox M (1984) A prim itive equation, three-dimensional model of the ocean. GFDL Ocean Group Tech Rep 1, GFDL/NOAA Princeton USA pp 143
Danielson EW Jr (1969) The surface heat budget of Hudson Bay. Marine Sci MS Report, 9, McGill University, Montreal, Canada pp 196
Drinkwater KF (1986) Physical oceanography of Hudson Strait and Ungava Bay. In Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44 Elsevier New York pp 237–261
Drinkwater KF, Taylor GB, Petrie, WB (1991) Temperature, salinity, and density data from the Hudson Strait Region during August–September, 1982. Can Data Rep Hydrogr Ocean Sci 99
Freeman NG, Murty TS (1976) Numerical modelling of tides in Hudson Bay. J Fish Res Board Can 33: 2345–2361
Gachon P, Laprise R, Zwack P, Saucier FJ (2002) The direct and indirect effects of surface forcings in the development of a model-simulated polar low in the Hudson Bay. Tellus A 55 (1): 61–87
Hunke EC (1998) CICE: the Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user’s manual. T-3 Fluid Dynamics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM USA 87545
Hunke EC, Dukowicz JK (1997) An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea ice dynamics. J Phys Oceanogr 27: 1849–1867
Idso SB, Jackson RD (1969) Thermal radiation from the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 74: 5397–5403
Ingram RG, Prinsenberg SJ (1998) Coastal oceanography of Hudson Bay and surrounding eastern Canadian Arctic waters. In: Robinson AR, Brink KH (eds) the sea, vol. 11 - the global coastal ocean, regional studies and syntheses, Chichestu UK Wiley, pp 835–861
Jackobsson M, Cherkis NZ, Woodward J, Macnab R, Coakley B (1996) New grid of Arctic bathymetry aids scientifics and mapmakers. Eos Transactions Am Gophys Union, 81(9): 89–93
Jones EP, Anderson LG (1994) Northern Hudson Bay and Foxe Bassin: water masses, circulation and productivity. Atmos Ocean 32: 361–374
Kantha LH, Mellor GL (1989) A two-dimensional coupled ice-ocean model of the Bering Sea marginal ice zone. J Geophys Res 94: 10921–10935
Laevastu T (1960) Factors affecting the temperature of the surface layer of the sea. Comm Phys Math 25: 1–136
Large WG, Pond S (1982) Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 12: 464–482
Loder JW, Petrie B, Gawarkiewicz G (1998) The coastal ocean off northeastern North America: a large-scale view. Ch 5 In: The sea vol 11 John Wiley Sons Chichestu Uk pp 105–133
Mailhot J, Sarrazin R, Bilodeau B, Brunet G, Pellerin P (1997) Development of the 35-km version of the operational regional forecast system. Atmos-Ocean 35: 1–28
Matsumoto K, Takanezawa T, Ooe M (2000) Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data into a hydrodynamical model: A global model and a regional model Around Japan. J Oceanogr 56: 567–581
Maxwell JB (1986) A climate overview on the Canadian Inland Seas. In: Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44, Elsevier, New York, pp 79–99
Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20 (4): 851–875
Mellor GL, Kantha LH (1989) An ice-ocean coupled model. J Geophys Res 94: 10,937–10,954
Mertz G, Narayanan S, Helbig J. (1993) The freshwater transport of the Labrador Current. Atmos-Ocean 31: 281–295
Milko R (1986) Potential ecological effects of the proposed Grand Canal Diversion project on Hudson and James bays. ARCT 39(4): 316–326
Padman L, Kottmeier C (2000) High-frequency ice motion and divergence in the Weddell Sea. J Geophys Res 105: 3379–3400
Parkinson CL, Washington WM (1979) A large-scale numerical model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 84: 311–337
Pellerin P, Ritchie H, Saucier FJ, Roy F, Desjardin S, Valin M, Lee V (2004) Impact of a two way coupling between an atmospheric and an ocean-Ice model over the Gulf of St. Lawrence Mon Weather Rev 132(6): 1379–1398
Prinsenberg SJ (1983) Effects of the hydroelectric developments on the oceanographic surface parameters of Hudson Bay. Atmos-Ocean 21: 418–430
Prinsenberg SJ (1986a) Salinity and temperature distribution of Hudson Bay and James Bay. In: Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44, Elsevier, New York, pp 163–186
Prinsenberg SJ (1986b) The circulation pattern and current structure of Hudson. In: Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44, Elsevier, New York, pp187–203
Prinsenberg SJ (1986c) On the physical oceanography of Foxe Basin. In: Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44, Elsevier, New York, pp 217–236
Prinsenberg SJ (1988) Ice-cover and ice-ridge contributions to the freshwater contents of Hudson Bay and Foxe Basin. ARCT 41(1): 6–11
Prinsenberg SJ (1991) Effects of hydro-electric projects on Hudson Bay’s marine and ice environments. James Bay Publication Series No. 2
Prinsenberg SJ, Freeman NG (1986) Tidal heights and currents in Hudson Bay and James Bay. In: Martini EP (ed) Canadian Inland Seas, Oceanogr Ser 44, Elsevier, New York, pp 205–216
Prinsenberg SJ, Loucks RH, Smith RE, Trites RW (1987) Hudson Bay and Ungava Bay runoff cycles for the period 1963–1983. Can Tech Rep Hydro Ocean Sci pp 92 71
Sadler HE (1982) Water flow into Foxe basin through Fury and Hecla Strait. Naturaliste Can 109: 701–707
Sandwell DT, Walter H, Smith F (2000) Bathymetric estimation. In: Fu LL, Cazenave A (eds) Satellite altimetry and earth sciences: a handbook of techniques and applications. International Geophysics Series, vol. 69 Academic Press, San Diego, USA
Saucier FJ, Dionne J (1998) A 3D coupled ice-ocean model applied to Hudson Bay, Canada: The seasonal cycle and time-dependent climate response to atmospheric forcing and runoff. J Geophys Res 103: 27,689–27,705
Saucier FJ, Roy F, Gilbert D, Pellerin P, Ritchie H (2003) The formation and circulation processes of water masses in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. J Geophys Res 108: 3269–3289
Semtner AJ Jr (1976) A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate. J Phys Oceanogr 6: 379–389
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3): 99–164
Stronach JA, Backhaus JO, Murty TS (1993) An update on the numerical simulation of oceanographic processes in the waters between Vancouver Island and the mainland: the GF8 model. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 31: 1–86
Thorndike AS, Rothrock DA, Maykut GS, Colony R (1975) The thickness distribution of sea ice. J Geophys Res 80: 4501–4513
Unesco (1981) Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater, UNESCO Tech Pap Mar Sci pp 4: 53
Wang J, Mysak L, Ingram RG (1994a) A numerical simulation of sea ice cover in Hudson Bay. J Phys Oceanogr 24: 2515–2533
Wang J, Mysak L, Ingram RG (1994b) Interannual variability of sea-ice cover in Hudson Bay, Baffin Bay and the Labrador sea. Atmos-Ocean 32: 421–447
Zalesak ST (1979) Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids. J Comput Phys 31: 335–362
Zillman JW (1972) A study of some aspects of the radiation and heat budgets of the southern hemisphere oceans. Meteorol Study Rep 26, Department of the Interior, Canberra, Australia pp 526
Acknowledgements
This work is a contribution to the Canadian CLIVAR Program funded by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences. We gratefully thank Gregory Flato and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments, Alain D’Astous and André Gosselin for software development, and Richard Chagnon for sea-ice data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1. Model formulation
Appendix 1. Model formulation
The equations for the momentum, mass, heat, salt, and turbulent kinetic energy can be written as (the comma subscript denotes partial derivative)
in hydrostatic, P ,z = – ρg, and Boussinesq approximations, and where u = (u,v,w) is the velocity along the horizontal axes x and y, and vertical axis z (positive upward), f is the Coriolis parameter (calculated in the β-plane approximation), P is the pressure, T is the temperature, S is the salinity, E is the turbulent kinetic energy, \( {\text{q}} = {\sqrt {2{\text{E}}} } \) is the turbulent velocity scale, l(z) is the turbulent length scale, K H is the horizontal eddy viscosity and diffusivity for momentum, T and S, K VM is the vertical eddy viscosity (and diffusivity for E), and K V σ is the vertical diffusivity for T and S. The equation of state ρ = ρ (S,T,P) is computed from Unesco (1981). The definitions and values of the different model parameters are given in Table 1.
1.1 Sub-grid mixing
The horizontal viscosity coefficient is described following Smagorinsky (1963) with K H = γΔx 2 [u ,x 2 + v ,y 2 + 0.5(u ,y + v ,x )2]0.5. The horizontal diffusivity for scalars is set to 2.5 m2 s–1 . The vertical eddy viscosity and diffusion coefficients are written as K VM = K VM0 + lq S M and K Vσ = K Vσ0 + lq S σ, where S M and S σ are stability functions derived by Canuto et al. (2001, first set), as described by Burchard and Bolding (2001). The background viscosity and diffusion coefficients are set to K VM0 = 10 –4 m2 s–1 and k V σ 0 = 10–6 m2 s–1. The turbulent length scale is prescribed following l(z) = min (l d,l, u ), between a parabolic law of the wall function, l d , and the Ozmidov scale, l u , given by
where z 0t and z 0b are the roughness lengths at the surface and bottom computed from Charnock’s formulae (Charnock 1955), z 0 = g –1 αu * 2, where α is the Charnock constant, h is water depth, and N is the Brunt Väisälä frequency.
1.2 Lateral boundary conditions
The lateral solid boundary conditions are free-slip for momentum, and isolated for tracers. Bottom friction is parametrized following Cox (1984), τ b = ρ0 C b∣u b∣u b, where u b is the bottom layer velocity. The water level, temperature, salinity and the eddy diffusion and viscosity coefficients are specified at the open boundaries across the mouth of HS and Fury and Hecla Strait. During inflow, a zero gradient condition is applied to all velocity components. Temperature and salinity relax toward prescribed observations, based on a characteristic length scale that a tracer travels normal to the boundary over one time step. During outflow (u > 0), the radiation condition ξ t + uξx = 0 is specified to ξ = u, v, T, S. On open ocean boundaries, horizontal and vertical viscosity and diffusivity coefficients are set to zero. The water level, salinity and temperature are specified to account for river discharge at the appropriate land/sea grid points.
1.3 Surface boundary conditions
Momentum is input at z = 0 from wind stress, K VM u ,z = ρ O –1 [(1 – A)τ AO + Aτ IO ]. The surface traction is described by quadratic drag forms (e.g. Charnock 1955) and τ AO = ρ A C DAO ∣u I –u O ∣(u I –u O ), u A , is the wind velocity at 10 m height, u I is the ice velocity, u O is the surface layer ocean velocity, C DAO is the atmosphere-ocean drag coefficient taken from Atakturk and Katsaros (1999), and C DIO is the atmosphere-ice drag coefficient.
Through the sea surface z = 0, heat is absorbed and released by radiative, sensible and latent heat transfers K Vσ T ,z = – ρ0 –1 C pO –1 [(1 – A)Q AO + AQ IO ], where Q AO and Q IO are the net heat fluxes at the atmosphere-ocean and ice-ocean boundaries, respectively. The ocean-atmosphere heat flux is described following Parkinson and Washington (1979) as Q AO = Q SAO + Q LAO – Q SW – Q LW ↓+ Q LW ↑, where Q SAO and Q LAO are the sensible and latent heat fluxes at the atmosphere-ocean boundary, Q SW and Q LW ↓ are the shortwave and longwave downward incident fluxes, and Q LW ↑ is the outgoing longwave radiation.
The sensible heat flux is given by Q SAO = ρ A C pA C SAO ∣u A ∣(T O –T A ), with air temperature T A and surface layer temperature T O (or sea surface temperature SST), where the Stanton number, C SAO, is taken from Large and Pond (1982). The latent heat flux is given by Q LAO = ρ A L V C LAO u A (q S –q A ), where C LAO is the Dalton number, and q A and q s are the specific humidity at 10 m height and at the surface, respectively, computed as in Parkinson and Washington (1979).
The shortwave energy flux through the sea surface is written as Q SW = (1 – α O )SW where α O is the albedo of sea water, and
(Laevastu 1960; Zillman 1972), where C l is the observed cloud fraction, e A is the near-surface vapor pressure, and θ z the solar zenith angle.
The longwave incident energy flux is computed from Idso and Jackson (1969), corrected for emission by the cloud base using the model from Bignami et al. (1995)
The outgoing longwave radiation is computed from the Stefan Boltzmann’s law, \(Q_{LW \uparrow } = \varepsilon _o \sigma T_o^4 .\) At the ice-ocean interface, we compute the sensible heat flux following \(Q_{IO} = \rho _o C_{po} C_{SIO} |{\mathbf{u}}_l - {\mathbf{u}}_o |(T_o - T_f ).\)
Salt is transferred through the sea surface by precipitation, evaporation, and ice growth rate (melt) over open ocean areas f 0, and ice covered areas f h, using K V σS ,z = ρ O –1 Q S = – [(1 – A)(f 0 + (P – E v )S O ) + A f h S O], where A is the ice concentration, P is the observed precipitation over open water (over ice and when T A< 0 °C precipitation accumulates as snow on the ice), E v = ρO –1 L V –1 Q LAO is the evaporation, and S O = SSS is the sea surface salinity.
1.4 Ice-atmosphere heat flux
The ice-atmosphere heat flux is Q AI = Q SAI + Q LAI – Q SW AI – Q LW ↓ + Q LW ↑, where the sensible and latent heat fluxes at the atmosphere-ice interface are written as for the atmosphere-ocean boundary, except that T O is replaced by T I , L v by L S , and C SAI = C SAO and C LAI = C LAO . The shortwave incident flux uses the albedo for dry snow, melting snow or bare ice (Table 1).
1.5 Sea ice
The elastic-viscous-plastic (EVP) sea-ice dynamic formulation from Hunke and Dukowicz (1997) (also Hunke 1998) is used in addition with a two-layer ice thermodynamics considering snow thickness over ice based on Semtner (1976). For each grid point sea ice is represented as a thickness distribution g assuming that
where hmax is the maximum allowed sea-ice thickness. The cumulative distribution of ice is defined as
Ice areas are transported after solving the momentum equation
where u I is the two-dimensional ice speed vector, m is the mass per unit area, k is a unit vertical vector, τ AI is the wind stress vector (same form as τ AO with coefficient C DAI ), g is the gravitational acceleration, η is the sea surface elevation, and σ is the two-dimensional Cauchy stress tensor. The mass per unit area is given by
ρ I and ρ S are the ice and snow density, respectively, and h s is the snow thickness over ice of thickness h.
The maximum resistance to pressure is defined as
Where H is the mean ice thickness. Sea ice areas are evolving through
where f I is the ice growth rate in ms–1, c S is the snow compaction rate in ms–1, and ψ is the ice redistribution term representing ridging. The compaction rate is defined as
where τ s is the snow compaction time scale (half life period). The term ψ is calculated using the weight function described in Thorndike et al. (1975) for convergence only, no ridging is applied in pure shear. The ridging function can be decomposed as an output and source term representing thinner ridging ice becoming thicker ridged ice such that
where
If h S (h)is the snow thickness over ice of thickness h, and gh S (h) = g(h)h S (h),
where f S is the snow growth in ms–1 from precipitation and thermodynamic melt. The term ψ S represents the redistribution of snow from ridging and is calculated using ψ in a way that snow volume is conserved
If ice of thickness h 1 is ridging into ice of thickness h 2 in a way that u(h 1) = s(h 2)h 2/h 1
The EVP solution uses two split time steps (Table 1) as discussed in Hunke and Dukowicz (1997).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saucier, F.J., Senneville, S., Prinsenberg, S. et al. Modelling the sea ice-ocean seasonal cycle in Hudson Bay, Foxe Basin and Hudson Strait, Canada. Climate Dynamics 23, 303–326 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0445-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0445-6