Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between the bladder wall thickness and urodynamic findings in patients with spinal cord injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether ultrasonographic bladder wall thickness (BWT) correlates with urodynamic parameters in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

Two hundred and seventy-two patients with SCI were enrolled in the study. All of the patients underwent bladder ultrasonography and urodynamic study. The anterior bladder wall was measured and compared to urodynamic data.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 37.4 years. The mean BWT was 3.9 mm. BWT was significantly higher in the patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity associated with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (NDO/DSD) compared to those without sphincter dyssynergia (4.2 vs. 3.6 mm, respectively, p < 0.001) and in those with compliance <20 ml/cm H2O. Nevertheless, ROC curve analysis [ROC = 0.624, 95 % CI (0.530, 0.718), p = 0.011] showed that no meaningful BWT measurement cutoff could be made to predict an elevated detrusor pressure in the storage phase.

Conclusions

Increased BWT was present in patients with low bladder compliance and NDO/DSD. No BWT cutoff value to predict an elevated detrusor pressure was found. Therefore, the measurement of BWT has no clinical role in patients with SCI and cannot replace urodynamic evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan SA, Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG (1991) Bladder and sphincter behavior in patients with spinal cord lesions. J Urol 146(1):113–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerridzen RG, Thijssen AM, Dehoux E (1992) Risk factors for upper tract deterioration in chronic spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 147(2):416–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM (1981) Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 126(2):205–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weld KJ, Graney MJ, Dmochowski RR (2000) Differences in bladder compliance with time and associations of bladder management with compliance in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 163(4):1228–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams P, Larsson G, Chapple C, Wein AJ (1999) Factors involved in the success of antimuscarinic treatment. BJU Int 83(Suppl 2):42–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hakenberg OW, Linne C, Manseck A, Wirth MP (2000) Bladder wall thickness in normal adults and men with mild lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement. Neurourol Urodyn 19(5):585–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blatt AH, Titus J, Chan L (2008) Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness in the assessment of voiding dysfunction. J Urol 179(6):2275–2278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka H, Matsuda M, Moriya K, Mitsui T, Kitta T, Nonomura K (2008) Ultrasonographic measurement of bladder wall thickness as a risk factor for upper urinary tract deterioration in children with myelodysplasia. J Urol 180(1):312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ukimura O, Kojima M, Inui E, Ochiai A, Naya Y, Kawauchi A et al (1998) Noninvasive evaluation of bladder compliance in children using ultrasound estimated bladder weight. J Urol 160(4):1459–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pannek J, Bartel P, Gocking K, Frotzler A (2013) Clinical usefulness of ultrasound assessment of detrusor wall thickness in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction due to spinal cord injury: urodynamics made easy? World J Urol 31(3):659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe T, Rivas DA, Chancellor MB (1996) Urodynamics of spinal cord injury. Urol Clin N Am 23(3):459–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levin RM, Haugaard N, O’Connor L, Buttyan R, Das A, Dixon JS et al (2000) Obstructive response of human bladder to BPH vs. rabbit bladder response to partial outlet obstruction: a direct comparison. Neurourol Urodyn 19(5):609–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilpin SA, Gosling JA, Barnard RJ (1985) Morphological and morphometric studies of the human obstructed, trabeculated urinary bladder. Br J Urol 57(5):525–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elbadawi A, Yalla SV, Resnick NM (1993) Structural basis of geriatric voiding dysfunction. IV. Bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 150(5 Pt 2):1681–1695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manieri C, Carter SS, Romano G, Trucchi A, Valenti M, Tubaro A (1998) The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men by ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness. J Urol 159(3):761–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naya Y, Kojima M, Honjyo H, Ochiai A, Ukimura O, Watanabe H (1998) Intraobserver and interobserver variance in the measurement of ultrasound-estimated bladder weight. Ultrasound Med Biol 24(5):771–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oelke M, Hofner K, Jonas U, Ubbink D, de la Rosette J, Wijkstra H (2006) Ultrasound measurement of detrusor wall thickness in healthy adults. Neurourol Urodyn 25(4):308–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bright E, Oelke M, Tubaro A, Abrams P (2010) Ultrasound estimated bladder weight and measurement of bladder wall thickness—useful noninvasive methods for assessing the lower urinary tract? J Urol 184(5):1847–1854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the nursing team that supported this work. We are also indebted to the statistician Marcelo Anzanello for his valuable statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All patients studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Ailton Fernandes Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, J.A.F., Gonsalves, M.C.D., de Melo, R.T. et al. Association between the bladder wall thickness and urodynamic findings in patients with spinal cord injury. World J Urol 33, 131–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1265-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1265-x

Keywords

Navigation