Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection and characterization of benign focal liver lesions with multislice CT

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MDCT is a rapidly evolving technique that significantly improves CT imaging for several indications including depiction of focal benign lesions. Imaging mainly profits from improved longitudinal spatial resolution allowing high-quality non-axial reformations and 3D reconstructions and CT angiography as well as rapid accurate multiphase imaging with short breath-holding periods. This review provides an overview of the current status of MDCT with respect to liver imaging and the implications for characterizing benign focal liver lesions. MDCT currently allows the acquisition of thin slices in daily routine diagnostics providing an improved detection rate of small liver lesions. Whereas large benign focal liver lesions exhibit typical patterns of morphology, attenuation and perfusion, which also may be assessed with single-slice scanners, small lesions remain challenging even with MDCT, since the specific criteria for confident diagnosis become more ambiguous. Here, MR imaging provides more detailed information about tissue components and the availability of liver-specific contrast agents, adding further impact to this technique. With respect to dose considerations, the number of necessary multiphase scans as well as the application of very thin collimation should be strictly checked for each patient undergoing MDCT based on the individual clinical situation and question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–h
Fig. 4a–h
Fig. 5a–c
Fig. 6a–g
Fig. 7a–d

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fox SH, Tanenbaum LN, Ackelsberg S et al (1998) Future directions in CT technology. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 8:497–513

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karhunen PJ (1986) Benign hepatic tumours and tumour-like conditions in men. J Clin Pathol 39:183–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeny PC, Marks WM (1986) Patterns of contrast enhancement of benign and malignant hepatic neoplasms during bolus dynamic and delayed CT. Radiology 160:613–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scatarige JC, Kenny JM, Fishman EK et al (1987) CT of giant cavernous hemangioma. AJR 149:83–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Powers C, Ros PR (1994) Hepatic mass lesions. In: Haaga JR, Sartoris DJ, Lanzieri CF, Zerhouni EA (eds) Computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the whole body, vol 2. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nagel HD (2004) Radiation dose issues with MSCT. In: Reiser MF, Taskahashi M, Modic M, Becker CR (eds) Multislice CT, 2nd revised edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flohr T, Stierdorfer K, Bruder H, Simon J, Schaller S (2002) New technical developments in multislice CT. RoFo 174:839–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G et al (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohnen M, Poll LJ, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Modder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 13:1148–1153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wedegartner U, Lorenzen M, Nagel HD et al (2004) Image quality of thin- and thick-slice MSCT reconstructions in low-contrast objects (liver lesions) with equal doses. Rofo 176:1676–1682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 235:756–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Hamm B (2001) Biphasic multi-slice helical CT of the liver: intraindividual comparison of different slice thicknesses for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Radiology 217:367

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haider MA, Amitai MM, Rappaport DC et al (2002) Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (< or = 1.5 cm) liver metastases: is thinner collimation better? Eur Radiol 225:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  14. Craig GR, Peters RL, Edmondson HA (1989) Tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bilde ducts. Atlas of tumor pathology, 2nd series. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235:872–878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson PJ, Arnold P, Wilson D (2003) Small “indeterminate” lesions on CT of the liver: a follow-up study of stability. Br J Radiol 76:866–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP (1998) Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology 209:417–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdelmoumene A, Chevallier P, Chalaron M et al (2005) Detection of liver metastases under 2 cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT). Eur Radiol 15:1881–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopp AF, Heuschmid M, Claussen CD (2001) Multidetector helical CT of the liver for tumor detection and characterization. Eur Rad 12:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD (2000) Multiphase hepatic CT with multirow-detector CT scanners. AJR 175:679–685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 207:647–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brink JA (2003) Use of high concentration contrast media (HCCM): principles and rationale–body CT. Eur J Radiol 45 (Suppl 1)S53–S58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marchiano A (2003) MDCT of primary liver malignancies. Eur Radiol 13:M26–M30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 195:353–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Forman HP, Sagel SS, Molina PL, Brown PC (1995) Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material. Radiology 197:83–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller DL, Simmons JT, Chang R (1987) Hepatic metastases detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods. Radiology 165:65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bernadino ME (1989) Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 172:27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S (2004) Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 230:142–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Ota T, Satake H, Ishigaki T (2003) Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner. Eur Radiol 13:1085–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Foley WD, Hoffmann RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE Jr, Perret RS (1994) Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol. Radiology 192:367–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Roos JE, Desbiolles LM, Weishaupt D et al (2004) Multi-detector row CT: effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement. Rofo 176:556–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Takada K, Awai K, Onishi H et al (2001) Detectability of hepatocelluar carcinoma by dynamic scan with multidetector row helical CT after injection of different contrast material concentration. Radiology 217:168

    Google Scholar 

  34. Awai K, Hori S (2003) Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:2155–2160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yagyu Y, Awai K, Inoue M et al (2005) MDCT of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: a prospective study using contrast materials with different iodine concentrations. AJR 184:1535–1540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, Hori S (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224:757–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y et al (2004) Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 233:682–688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hirano T, Ogura K, Kumagai A et al (2003) Contrast injection protocols using dual head injector. Jpn J Radiol Technol 59:247–248

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Kani H, Miyao M, Yoshikawa S, Narabayashi I (2003) Effect of contrast material pushed with saline solution using dual injection on enhancement of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma in multislice CT of the liver. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 63:409–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dorio PJ, Lee FT Jr, Henseler KP et al (2003) Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT. Eur Radiol 180:929–934

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sandstede JJ, Tschammler A, Beer M, Vogelsang C, Wittenberg G, Hahn D (2001) Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT. Eur Radiol 11:1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Satake H, Iwano S, Ishigaki T (2004) Late-arterial and portal-venous phase imaging of the liver with a multislice CT scanner in patients without circulatory disturbances: automatic bolus tracking or empirical scan delay? AJR 14(9):1665–1673

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van Hoe L, Marchal G, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, Mertens L (1995) Determination of scan delay time in spiral CT-angiography: utility of a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zandrino F, Curone P, Benzi L, Musante F (2003) Value of an early arteriographic acquisition for evaluating the splanchnic vessels as an adjunct to biphasic CT using a multislice scanner. Eur Radiol 13:1072–1079

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tanikake M, Shimizu T, Narabayashi I et al (2003) Three-dimensional CT angiography of the hepatic artery: use of multi-detector row helical CT and a contrast agent. Eur Radiol 227:883–889

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oliver JH III, Baron RL, Federle MP et al (1997) Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 205:709–715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takaki H, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A et al (2000) Lesion detectability of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma with dynamic enhanced dual-arterial phase multidetector-row CT. Radiology 217:367

    Google Scholar 

  48. Murakami T, Kim T, Takamura M et al (2001) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 218:763–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Francis IR, Cohan RH, McNulty NJ et al (2003) Multidetector CT of the liver and hepatic neoplasms: effect of multiphasic imaging on tumor conspicuity and vascular enhancement. AJR 180:1217–1224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Winston CB, Koea J, Teitcher JB et al (2001) 3D CT angiography of the liver performed on a multidetector CT scanner. Radiology 217:417

    Google Scholar 

  51. Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M et al (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. AJR 231:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  52. Valette PF, Pilleul F, Crombé-Ternamian A (2003) MDCT of benign liver tumors and metastases. Eur Radiol 13:M31–M41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ishak KG (1975) Benign tumors of the liver. Med Clin North Am 59:995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Freeny PC, Grossholz M, Kaakaji K, Schmiedl UP (2003) Significance of hyperattenuating and contrast-enhancing hepatic nodules detected in the cirrhotic liver during arterial phase helical CT in pre-liver transplant patients: radiologic-histopathologic correlation of explanted livers. Abdom Imaging 28:333–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dähnert W (1993) Liver, bile ducts, pancreas, and spleen. In: Radiology review manual. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  56. Glazer GM, Aisen AM, Francis IR, Gyves JW, Lande I, Adler DD (1985) Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 155:417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Furui S (1985) Noninvasive diagnosis of small cavernous hemangioma of the liver: advantage of MRI. AJR 145:1195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ros PR, Menu Y, Vilgrain V, Mortele KJ, Terris B (2001) Liver neoplasms and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 11:S145–S165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ros (2000) Benign liver tumors. Eur Radiol 10(S2):175–184

    Article  PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20:379–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gaa J, Saini S (1990) Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: diagnosis by means of rapid dynamic nonincremental CT. In: Ferrucci HT, Stark DD (eds) Liver imaging. Andover Med, Boston, pp 212-216

    Google Scholar 

  62. Langer R, Langer M, Felix R et al (1990) Hepatic cavernous hemangioma. A comparison of diagnostic technics. Rontgenpraxis 43:65–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Choi BI, Han MC, Park JH, Kim SH, Han MH, Kim CW (1989) Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver: CT and MR imaging in 10 cases. AJR 152:1221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hanafusa K, Ohashi I, Himeno Y, Suzuki S, Shibuya H (1995) Hepatic hemangioma: findings with two-phase CT. Radiology 196:465–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Byun JH, Kim TK, Lee CW et al (2004) Arterioportal shunt: prevalence in small hemangiomas versus that in hepatocellular carcinomas 3 cm or smaller at two-phase helical CT. AJR 232:354–360

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cronan JJ, Esparza AR, Dorfman GS, Ridlen MS, Paolella LP (1988) Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 166:135–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim T, Federle MP, Baron RL, Peterson MS, Kawamori Y (2001) Discrimination of small hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular malignant tumors smaller than 3 cm with three-phase helical CT. Radiology 219:699–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Fechner RE (1977) Benign hepatic lesions and orally administered contraceptives. A report of seven cases and a critical analysis of the literature. Hum Pathol 8:255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Felix R, Langer R, Langer M (eds) Benign primary liver tumors. In: Diagnostic imaging in liver disease. Springer, Berlin, pp 106

  70. Mathieu D, Zafrani ES, Anglade MC, Dhumeaux D (1989) Association of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic hemangioma. Gastroenterology 97:154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF, Johnson CM (1985) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison on angiography, CT, US, and scintigraphy. Radiology 156:593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Mathieu D, Vilgrain V, Mahfouz A-E et al (1997) Benign liver tumors. MRI Clin North Am 5:255–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Dachman AH, Ros PR, Goodman ZD et al (1987) Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver: clinical and radiologic observations. AJR 148:717–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA, Schneider G (2005) Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 236(1): 166–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fabre M, Neyra M (1995) Role of fine-needle puncture in the diagnosis of a hepatic mass. Ann Pathol 15:380–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Ros PR (1990) Computed tomography-pathologic correlations in hepatic tumors. In: Ferrucci JT, Matheiu DG (eds) Advances in hepatobiliary radiology. Mosby, St Louis, pp 75–108

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ, Uggowitzer MM, Kugler C, Zebedin D, Schaffler G, Ruppert GS (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma of the liver: differentiation with multiphasic helical CT. AJR 176:1493–1498

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Klein D, Jenett M, Gassel HJ, Sandstede J, Hahn D (2004) Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography of hepatic tumors. Eur Radiol 14:1082–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Quaia E et al (2005) Benign focal liver lesions: spectrum of findings on SonoVue-enhanced pulse-inversion ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 15:1643–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. T. Winterer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winterer, J.T., Kotter, E., Ghanem, N. et al. Detection and characterization of benign focal liver lesions with multislice CT. Eur Radiol 16, 2427–2443 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0247-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0247-9

Keywords

Navigation