Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared to fundamental B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the pathology of large and small bowel

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our purpose was to compare phase-inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) with conventional B-mode ultrasound (US) regarding image quality in the evaluation of bowel pathology. Forty-one patients prospectively underwent intestinal ultrasound scans with US and PIHI in randomly chosen order. Crucial technical parameters were standardized. Bowel morphology as well as perienteric pathology and complications were documented. In 24 cases, the ultrasound results were compared to those of other imaging modalities. Three radiologists evaluated (1) overall image quality, (2) lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, and (3) detection of free fluid on hardcopy films. The ratings for image quality were compared using the two-sample paired t test for means and Bowker’s test for symmetry (p=0.05). Compared to US, PIHI provided significantly better overall image quality, lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, as well as better detection of free fluid (p< 0.05). Bowel wall pathology, detected by both modalities, showed good correlation to additional imaging modalities. In 12 patients (29.3%), a gain of crucial diagnostic information was observed with PIHI when compared to US. PIHI significantly enhances sonography of the intestine by offering better overall image quality, better visualization of bowel pathology and associated changes. Additionally, PIHI adds crucial diagnostic information in several patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Malley M, Wilson S (2003) US of gastrointestinal tract abnormalities with CT correlation. Radiographics 23:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanbidge A, Lynch D, Wilson S (2003) US of the peritoneum. Radiographics 23:663–684 (discussion 684–5)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whittingham T (1999) Tissue harmonic imaging. Eur Radiol 9(Suppl 3):S323–S326

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman CS, Lazenby CL (1997) Ultrasound imaging system employing phase inversion subtraction to enhance the image. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., Iselin, N.J. U.S. Patent No. 5,632,277; May 27, 1997; U.S.A.

  5. Becker D, Strobel D, Hahn EG (2000) Tissue harmonic imaging and contrast harmonic imaging. Improving the diagnosis of liver metastasis? Internist 41:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claudon M, Tranquart F, Evans D, Lefevre F, Correas M (2002) Advances in ultrasound. Eur Radiol 12:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burns PN, Powers JE, Simpson DH, Uhlendorf V, Fritzsch T (1996) Harmonic imaging—principles and preliminary results. Angiology 47:S63–S73

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer A, Zomack M, Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D, Urbank A, Schlief R (1998) New concepts for ultrasound contrast imaging. In: Bogdahn U, Becker G, Schlachetzki F (eds) Echoenhancers and transcranial color duplex sonography. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 204–215

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer A, Hauff P, Lazenby J, von Behren P, Zomack M, Reinhardt M, Schlief R (1999) Wideband harmonic imaging: a novel contrast ultrasound imaging technique. Eur Radiol 9(Suppl 3):S364–S367

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huck K (2005) New developments in ultrasound. In: A guide to Doppler- and duplex-sonography, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leen E (2001) Ultrasound contrast harmonic imaging of abdominal organs. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quaia E, Bertolott M, Forgács B, Rimondini A, Locatelli M, Mucelli R (2003) Detection of liver metastases by pulse inversion harmonic imaging during Levovist late phase: comparison with conventional ultrasound and helical CT in 160 patients. Eur Radiol 13:475–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quaia E, Siracusano S, Bertolotto M, Monduzzi M, Mucelli R (2003) Characterization of renal tumours with pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high mechanical index technique: initial results. Eur Radiol 13:1402–1412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hetzel G (2003) New developments in the technique of ultrasound. Radiologe 43:777–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulvagh S, Foley D, Belohlavek M, Seward J (1998) Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography: part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization. Mayo Clin Proc 73:1062–1065

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R (1998) Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. Am J Roentgenol 171:1203–1206

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hann L, Bach A, Cramer L, Siegel D, Yoo H, Garcia R (1999) Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. Am J Roentgenol 173:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau J, Tradup D, Beck R, Kofler J, Groth D (2000) Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics 20:1127–1135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jang H, Lim H, Lee W, Kim S, Kim K, Kim E (2000) Ultrasonographic evaluation of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse inversion harmonic, tissue harmonic, and conventional imaging techniques. J Ultrasound Med 19:293–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Treadwell M, Seubert D, Zador I, Goyert G, Wolfe H (2000) Benefits associated with tissue harmonic imaging in the obstetric patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1620–1622

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hong H, Han J, Kim T, Kim Y, Kim J, Cha J, Choi B (2001) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the gallbladder: comparison of fundamental, tissue harmonic, and pulse inversion harmonic imaging. J Ultrasound Med 20:35–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo B, Oh Y, Kim H, Kim H, Kang C, Lee N, Kim J, Park B, Cho K, Lee J, Lee K, Bae J (2002) Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 3:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt T, Hohl C, Haage P, Blaum M, Honnef D, Weiss C, Staatz G, Gunther R (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging versus fundamental B-mode sonography in the evaluation of focal lesions of the kidney. Am J Roentgenol 180:1639–1647

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hohl C, Schmidt T, Haage P, Honnef D, Blaum M, Staatz G, Guenther R (2004) Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Eur Radiol 14:1109–1117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleischer AC, Muhletaler CA, James AEJ (1981) Sonographic assessment of the bowel wall. Am J Roentgenol 136:887–891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeffrey R Jr, Laing F, Townsend R (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ledermann H, Borner N, Strunk H, Bongartz G, Zollikofer C, Stuckmann G (2000) Bowel wall thickening on transabdominal sonography. Am J Roentgenol 174:107–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarrazin J, Wilson S (1996) Manifestations of Crohn disease at US. Radiographics 16:499–520; discussion 520–1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oudenhoven L, Koumans R, Puylaert J (1998) Right colonic diverticulitis: US and CT findings—new insights about frequency and natural history. Radiology 208:611–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Del Pozzo G, Albillos J, Tejedor D (1996) Intussusception: US findings with pathologic correlation—the crescent-in-doughnut sign. Radiology 199:688–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Levine M, Rubesin S, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck J, Herlinger H (1997) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: radiographic findings. Am J Roentgenol 168:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ortega D, Burns PN, Simpson DH, Wilson SR (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging: is it a benefit for bile duct sonography? Am J Roentgenol 176:653–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsumura T, Moriyasu F, Kono Y, Chiba T (1998) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging of the liver—preliminary animal study. Nippon Rinsho 56:985–989

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tanaka S, Oshikawa O, Sasaki T, Ioka T, Tsukuma H (2000) Evaluation of tissue harmonic imaging for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 26: 183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Desser TS, Jeffrey RB (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 22:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  36. Whittingham TA (1999) An overview of digital technology in ultrasonic imaging: section I. New transducers. Eur Radiol 9(Suppl 3):298–303

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057, Aachen, Germany

    T. Schmidt, C. Hohl, P. Haage, D. Honnef, A. H. Mahnken, G. Krombach, W. Piroth & R. W. Günther

Authors
  1. T. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Hohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Haage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Honnef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. H. Mahnken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. Krombach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. W. Piroth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. W. Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, T., Hohl, C., Haage, P. et al. Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared to fundamental B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the pathology of large and small bowel. Eur Radiol 15, 2021–2030 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2749-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2749-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation