Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feeding of dominant zooplankton in Prydz Bay, Antarctica, during austral spring/summer: food availability and species responses

  • Short Note
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on the food and predation of zooplankton species is essential for an improved understanding of zooplankton community dynamics of the Southern Ocean. Feeding of dominant zooplankton species at locations across the neritic, slope and oceanic regions of Prydz Bay, Antarctica, was investigated with incubation experiments during austral spring/summer of 2009/2010 to identify the response of dominant copepods and krill to different feeding environments. Results showed distinct spatial and temporal variations in ingestion and filtration of predominant copepods and krill. In late spring, Calanoides acutus was inactive and the ingestion rate was only 1.30 μgC/ind/day. During early summer, a diatom bloom was in progress at station IS21, showing a peak biomass of Thalassiosira spp. and Fragilaria spp. Daily ingestion rates of Euphausia crystallorophias, C. acutus, Metridia gerlachei and Ctenocalanus citer were relatively high. By contrast, copepod ate predominantly ciliates in slope and oceanic regions where microplankton biomass were lower (<20 μgC/L). During late summer, microplankton of neritic regions, mainly composed of nano-sized Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and ciliates, was less than 10 μgC/L. C. acutus incubated in neritic regions mainly ate ciliates. The total microplankton biomass was lower (<5 μgC/L) and predominated by Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in slope regions north of Fram Bank, and daily ingestion rates of incubated copepods were less than 2.5 μgC/ind. Our results clearly demonstrated that copepods and krill had flexible feeding strategies to cope with temporally and spatially changing food availability in Prydz Bay. Meanwhile, ciliates appeared to represent an important carbon source for zooplankton, especially in regions with lower food concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Atkinson A (1996) Subantarctic copepods in an oceanic, low chlorophyll environment: ciliate predation, food selectivity and impact on prey populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson A, Shreeve RS (1995) Response of the copepod community to a spring bloom in the Bellingshausen Sea. Deep Sea Res II 42:1291–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson A, Shreeve RS, Pakhomov EA, Priddle J, Blight SP, Ward P (1996) Zooplankton response to a phytoplankton bloom near South Georgia, Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 144:195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubischar CD, Bathmann UV (1997) Grazing impact of copepods and salps on phytoplankton in Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res II 44:415–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evjemo JO, Tokle N, Vadstein O, Olsen Y (2008) Effect of essential dietary fatty acids on egg production and hatching success of the marine copepod Temora longicornis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 365(1):31–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Froneman PW, Pakhomov EA, Perissinotto R, McQuaid CD (1996) Role of microplankton in the diet and daily ration of Antarctic zooplankton species during austral summer. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 143:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost BW (1972) Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol Oceanogr 17:805–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibotti IA, Vernet M, Ferrario ME (2005) Annually recurrent phytoplanktonic assemblages during summer in the seasonal ice zone west of the Antarctic Peninsula (Southern Ocean). Deep Sea Res I 52:1823–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford DJ (1993) Consumption of protozoa by copepods feeding on natural microplankton assemblages. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ (eds) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 723–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen W, Auel H (2001) Seasonal adaptations and the role of lipids on oceanic zooplankton. Zoology 104:313–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins TL, Torres JJ (1989) Midwater food web in the vicinity of a marginal ice zone in the western Weddell Sea. Deep Sea Res 36:543–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosie GW, Cochran TG (1994) Mesoscale distribution patterns of macrozooplankton communities in Prydz Bay, Antarctica—January to February 1991. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosie GW, Cochran TG, Pauly T, Beaumont KL, Wright SW, Kitchener JA (1997) Zooplankton community structure of Prydz Bay, Antarctic, January–February 1993. Proc NIPR Symp Polar Biol 10:90–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen S, Bathmann U (2007) Algae viability within copepod faecal pellets: evidence from microscopic examinations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju SJ, Harvey R (2004) Lipids as markers of nutritional condition and diet in the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba and Euphausia crystallorophias during austral winter. Deep Sea Res II 51(17–19):2199–2214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse S, Jansen S, Kragefsky S, Bathmann U (2009) Gut content analyses of three dominant Antarctic copepod species during an induced phytoplankton bloom EIFEX (Europe iron fertilization experiment). Mar Ecol 30:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CL, Sun S, Zhang GT, Ji P (2001) Summer feeding activities of zooplankton in Prydz Bay, Antarctica. Polar Biol 24:892–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menden-Deuer S, Lessard EJ (2000) Carbon to volume relationship for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protest plankton. Limnol Oceanogr 45:569–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B (2012) The overwintering of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, from an ecophysiological perspective. Polar Biol 35:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B, Auerswald L, Siegel V, Spahic S, Pape C, Fach B, Teschke M, Lopata A, Fuentes V (2010) Seasonal variation in body composition, metabolic activity, feeding, and growth of adult krill Euphausia superba in the Lazarev Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 398:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michels J, Schnack-Schiel SB (2005) Feeding in dominant Antarctic copepods—does the morphology of the mandibular gnathobases relate to diet? Mar Biol 146:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau S, Ferreyra GA, Mercier B, Lemarchand K, Lionard M, Roy S, Mostajir B, Roy S, Hardenberg B, Demers S (2010) Variability of the microbial community in the western Antarctic Peninsula from late fall to spring during a low ice cover year. Polar Biol 33(12):1599–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putt M, Stoecker DK (1989) An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine “oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal water. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K, Atkinson A, Petzke KJ, Voss M, Pond DW (2006) Protozoans as a food source for Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba: complementary insights from stomach content, fatty acids, and stable isotopes. Limnol Oceanogr 51(5):2409–2427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield O, Ducklow HW, Martinson DG, Meredith MP, Moline MA, Fraser WR (2010) How do polar marine ecosystems respond to rapid climate change? Science 328:1520–1523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NR, Dong ZQ, Kerry KR, Wright S (1984) Water masses and circulation in Prydz Bay, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res 31(1):1121–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker DK, Capuzzo JM (1990) Predation on protozoa: importance to zooplankton. J Plankton Res 12:891–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Liu DY (2003) Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J Plankton Res 25(11):1331–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swadling KM, Gibson JAE, Ritz DA, Nichols PD, Hughes DE (1997) Grazing of phytoplankton by copepods in eastern Antarctic coastal waters. Mar Biol 128:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanimura A, Kawaguchi S, Oka N, Nishikawa J, Toczko S, Takahashi KT, Terazaki M, Odate T, Fukuchi M, Hosie G (2008) Abundance and grazing impacts of krill, salps and copepods along the 140°E meridian in the Southern Ocean during summer. Antarct Sci 20(4):365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobe K, Meyer B, Fuentes V (2010) Detection of zooplankton items in the stomach and gut content of larval krill, Euphausia superba, using a molecular approach. Polar Biol 33:407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward P, Shreeve R, Atkinson A, Korb B, Whitehouse M, Thorpe S, Pond D, Cunningham N (2006) Plankton community structure and variability in the Scotia Sea: austral summer 2003. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 309:75–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward P, Whitehouse M, Shreeve R, Thorpe S, Atkinson A, Korb R, Pond D, Young E (2007) Plankton community structure south and west of South Georgia (Southern Ocean): links with production and physical forcing. Deep Sea Res I 54:1871–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts J, Tarling GA (2012) Population dynamics and production of Themisto gaudichaudii (Amphipoda, Hyperiidae) at South Georgia, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res II 59:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WJ, Carmack EC, Ingram RG (2007) Physical oceanography of polynya. In: Smith WO Jr, Barber DG (eds) Polynyas: windows to the world. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 55–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GD, Nicol S, Aoki S, Meijers AJS, Bindoff NL, Iijima Y, Marsland SJ, Klocker A (2010) Surface oceanography of BROKE-West, along the Antarctic margin of the south-west Indian Ocean (30–80°E). Deep Sea Res II 57(9–10):738–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Li CL, Sun S (2011) Inter-annual variation in summer zooplankton community structure in Prydz Bay, Antarctica, from 1999 to 2006. Polar Biol 34(6):921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yebra L, Hernandez-Leon S, Almeida C, Becognee P (2009) Metabolism and biomass vertical distribution of zooplankton in the Bransfield Strait during the austral summer of 2000. Polar Res 28(3):415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank crew on RV “Xuelong” for their assistance in the field and thank for Prof. J Shi for providing the temperature and salinity data. We are grateful to the Polar Biology Repository of the Marine Biological Museum of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (MBMCAS) for providing samples. Thanks also go to Prof. J Purcell for the help in language improving. This research was supported by National Polar Project of China (No. JDZX20110016), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41206180) and Open Research Fund Program of SOA (No. KP201109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaolun Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 61 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 263 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, G., Li, C., Sun, S. et al. Feeding of dominant zooplankton in Prydz Bay, Antarctica, during austral spring/summer: food availability and species responses. Polar Biol 36, 1701–1707 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1387-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1387-4

Keywords

Navigation