Abstract
Southern Elephant Seals are upper marine predators of the Southern Ocean. As such, their population dynamics and fluctuations reflect environment conditions. Their worldwide populations crashed during the second half of the twentieth century for reasons not yet completely elucidated. Here, we studied the largest population of Southern Elephant Seals within the South Indian Ocean that are breeding on îles Kerguelen. In a previous analysis, Guinet et al. in Antarct Sci 11:193–197, 1999) suggested that the decline on îles Kerguelen might be over, as observed elsewhere. Using 10 years of additional data, we updated this analysis using state-of-the-art statistical methods to account for most uncertainties associated with count data. We showed that the population of female Southern Elephant Seals breeding on îles Kerguelen has been stable over the past 20 years. Despite concomitant global changes within the Southern Ocean, we did not find any evidence of a phenological shift in peak haul-out date of breeding females between the 1970s and the 2000s.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnbom T, Fedak MA, Rothery P (1994) Offspring sex ratio in relation to female size in Southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:373–378
Boyd IL, Walker TR, Poncet J (1996) Status of Southern Elephant Seals at South Georgia. Antarct Sci 8:237–244
Campagna C, Lewis M, Baldi R (1993) Breeding biology of Southern elephant seals in Patagonia. Mar Mammal Sci 9:34–47
Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244
Condit R, Le Bœuf B, Morris PA, Sylvan M (2007) Estimating population size in asynchronous aggregations: a Bayesian approach and test with elephant seal censuses. Mar Mammal Sci 23:834–855
Cowles MK, Carlin BP (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. J Am Stat Assoc 91:883–904
Ellison AM (2004) Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecol Lett 7:509–520
Fùquene JA, Cook JD, Pericchi LR (2009) A case for robust Bayesian priors with applications to clinical trials. Bayesian Anal 4:817–846
Galimberti F, Boitani L (1999) Demography and breeding biology of a small, localized population of Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). Mar Mammal Sci 15:159–178
Galimberti F, Sanvito S (2001) Modeling female haul-out in Southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Aquat Mammal 27:92–104
Gelman A (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper). Bayesian Anal 1:515–534
Gelman A, Jakulin A, Grazia Pittau M, Su Y-S (2008) A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann Appl Stat 2:1360–1383
Guinet C, Jouventin P, Weimerskirch H (1999) Recent population change of the Southern elephant seal at îles Crozet and îles Kerguelen: the end of the decrease? Antarct Sci 11:193–197
Gurrin LC, Scurrah KJ, Hazelton ML (2005) Tutorial in biostatistics: spline smoothing with linear mixed models. Stat Med 24:3361–3381
Hindell M, Burton HR (1988) Seasonal haul-out patterns of the Southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina L.) at Macquarie island. J Mammal 69:81–88
Hovestadt T, Nowicki P (2008) Process and measurement errors in population size: their mutual effects on precision and bias of estimates for demographic parameters. Biodivers Conserv 17:3417–3429
Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2003) Effects of climate variability on the temporal population dynamics of Southern fulmars. J Anim Ecol 72:576–587
Laws RM (1993) Antarctic seals: research methods and techniques, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lenglart PY, Bester MN (1982) Post-weaning dispersion of Southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina underyearlings at Kerguelen. Rev Ecol-Terre Vie 36:175–185
McMahon CR, Burton HR, Bester MN (2003) A demographic comparison of two Southern elephant seal populations. J Anim Ecol 72:61–74
McMahon CR, Bester MN, Burton HR, Hindell MA, Bradshaw CJA (2005) Population status, trends and a re-examination of the hypotheses explaining the recent declines in the Southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Mammal Rev 35:82–100
McMahon CR, Bester MN, Hindell MA, Brook BW, Bradshaw CJA (2009) Shifting trends: detecting environmentally mediated regulation in long-lived marine vertebrates using time-series data. Oecologia 159:69–82
Pascal M (1981) Évolution numérique de la population d’éléphants de mer (Mirounga leonina (L.)) de l’Archipel des Kerguelen au cours des 30 dernières années. Publications 51, CNFRA
Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2008) coda: output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC. R package version 0.13-2
R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rothery P, McCann TS (1987) Estimating pup production of elephant seals at South Georgia. Symp Zool Soc Lond 58:211–223
Slade RW, Moritz C, Hoelzel AR, Burton HR (1998) Molecular population genetics of the Southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Genetics 149:1945–1957
Slip DJ, Burton HR (1999) Population status and seasonal haulout patterns of the Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) at Heard island. Antarct Sci 11:38–47
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best TA, Best N, Lunn D (2003) WinBUGS User Manual version 1.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge
Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A (2005) R2winbugs: a package for running WinBUGS from R. J Stat Softw 12:1–16
Trathan PN, Forcada J, Murphy EJ (2007) Environmental forcing and Southern Ocean marine predator populations: effects of climate change and variability. Philos Trans R Soc B 362:2351–2365
Van Aarde RJ (1980) Fluctuations in the population of Southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina at Kerguelen island. South Afr J Zool 15:99–106
van den Hoff J, Burton H, Raymond B (2007) The population trend of Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina L.) at Macquarie island (1952–2004). Polar Biol 30:1275–1283
Wade PR (2000) Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 14:1308–1316
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all fieldworkers who have collected the census data since 1950. In particular, the authors would like to thank Gilbert Belou, Nicolas Bral, Olivier Citon, Michel Corsini, Frank Dabouen, Léa Dordonne, Anne-Cécile Dragon, Nory El-Ksabi, Sébastien Fossaluzza, Alain Frenet, Jean-Baptiste Jolly, Rodolphe Masset, Marco, Florent Montoya, Ludovic Lebail, Brigitte Planade, Patrice Pozzo, Alexandre Schuler and Sébastien Val for their much welcomed help in performing daily censuses in 2009. We also thank Quentin Delorme and the 58ieme Mission for field work in 2008. We also thank Clive McMahon, John van den Hoff and an anonymous reviewer for critical and helpful comments. This study is part of a national research program (no. 109, H. Weimerskirch) supported by the French Polar Institute (Institut Paul Emile Victor, IPEV). The Territoire des Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises (TAAF) and ANR-VMC 07 IPSOS-SEAL program contributed to this study. The ethics committee of the French Polar Institute (IPEV) approved this study. All animals in this study were cared for in accordance with its guidelines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
300_2010_881_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 1 Corrected estimates of female Southern Elephant Seals breeding on the Courbet Peninsula. Lower and upper bounds refer to a 95% credible interval. *The 1970 census is incomplete (XLSX 9 kb)
300_2010_881_MOESM2_ESM.eps
Supplementary Fig. 1 Plots of all surveyed harems in 2009 (3 first rows) and in 2008 (2 last rows) at Cape Ratmanoff. The x-axis corresponds to census date, and the vertical, dotted grey line symbolize the 15th of October. Light grey dots correspond to raw data, and the black solid to the posterior mean number of hauled-out female at date t. Overheading each subplot is the name of the surveyed harem along with the estimated (posterior mean) number of hauled-out females (EPS 49 kb)
300_2010_881_MOESM3_ESM.eps
Supplementary Fig. 2 Plots of standardized residuals from the hierarchical model fitted to data collected in 2009 (3 first rows) and in 2008 (2 last rows) at Cape Ratmanoff. The x-axis corresponds to census date. The horizontal dotted grey symbolized the lower and upper 5% percentile of a standard Student distribution, while the horizontal dotted black line marked the value 0. Black dots symbolized the residuals. The curve fitted through the residuals is a loess (EPS 56 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
WinBUGS code to fit Rothery and McCann (1987)’s model
## Data
# N : number of data points
# N.site : number of surveyed rookeries
# N.who : number of different field workers
# t[] : census date (0 = 15th October)
# n[] : number of counted females
# site[] : dummy code for each surveyed rookery
# who[] : dummy code for who made the census
# S : mean length a female stays ashore (in days)
## Parameters of Inferential Interest
# sd : residual error
# nu : number of degrees of freedom of the Student distribution
# beta : marginal means
# Nmax : maximum number of females present on each site
# peak.return : date of peak return of females on each site
# peak.haulout : date of peak presence of females on each site
# sd.b : site variances
# cor.b : correlation between Nmax, peak.return and synchrony
# sd.observer : observer error
##
model{
# Likelihood, Student distribution for residual error
for (i in 1 : N) {
n[i] ~ dt(mu[i],tau,nu)
mu[i] < - Nmax[Site[i]]*p[i] + observer[who[i]]
p[i] < - phi(Arrival[i]) - phi(Departure[i])
Arrival[i] < - (t[i]-peak.return[Site[i]])/synchrony[Site[i]]
Departure[i] < - (t[i]-S.cut-peak.return[Site[i]])/synchrony[Site[i]]
}
# Priors
tau < - pow(sd,-2); sd ~ dunif(0,100); nu ~ dunif(2,50);
for (i in 1 : N.site) {peak.haulout[i] < - peak.return[i] + S.cut/2}
## the cut() function is to prevent the data from feedbacking on S
S.cut < - cut(S); S ~ dnorm(28,0.20)
# Half-Cauchy (weakly informative) prior for beta[1] (Nmax > 0)
beta[1] < - abs(raw.beta[1]); prior.scale[1] < - 1000
raw.beta[1] ~ dnorm(0,tau.beta[1]);
tau.beta[1] < - pow(prior.scale[1],-2)*eta.beta[1];
# Cauchy Prior (weakly informative) for beta[2] (peak.return)
beta[2] < - raw.beta[2]; prior.scale[2] < - 10
raw.beta[2] ~ dnorm(0,tau.beta[2]);
tau.beta[2] < - pow(prior.scale[2],-2)*eta.beta[2];
# Half-Cauchy (weakly informative) for beta[3] (synchrony > 0)
beta[3] < - abs(raw.beta[3]); prior.scale[3] < - 10
raw.beta[3] ~ dnorm(0,tau.beta[3]);
tau.beta[3] < - pow(prior.scale[3],-2)*eta.beta[3];
# Inverse-Wishart prior for site variances
for (i in 1 : (N.site + 1)) {
Nmax[i] < - B[i,1]; B.hat[i,1] < - beta[1]
peak.return[i] < - B[i,2]; B.hat[i,2] < - beta[2]
synchrony[i] < - B[i,3]; B.hat[i,3] < - beta[3]
B[i,1:3] ~ dmnorm(B.hat[i,],tau.B[,])
}
tau.B[1:3,1:3] ~ dwish(W[,],3); SD[1:3,1:3] < - inverse(tau.B[,]);
W[1,1] < - 150; W[1,2] < - 0; W[1,3] < - 0;
W[2,1] < - 0; W[2,2] < - 4; W[2,3] < - 0;
W[3,1] < - 0; W[3,2] < - 0; W[3,3] < - 2;
for (j in 1 : 3) {
sd.b[j] < - sqrt(SD[j,j]);
eta.beta[j] ~ dgamma(0.5,0.5)
}
cor_b[1] < - SD[1,2]/sqrt(SD[1,1]*SD[2,2])
cor_b[2] < - SD[1,3]/sqrt(SD[1,1]*SD[3,3])
cor_b[3] < - SD[2,3]/sqrt(SD[2,2]*SD[3,3])
# Half-Cauchy Priors for fieldworker variance
for (i in 1:N.who) {
observer[i] < - x*U[i];
U[i] ~ dnorm(0,tau.U)
}
x ~ dnorm(0,tau.x);
tau.x < - pow(prior.scale.who,-2);
tau.U ~ dgamma(0.5,0.5)
sd.observer < - abs(x)/sqrt(tau.U);
prior.scale.who < - 10
} # end of model
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Authier, M., Delord, K. & Guinet, C. Population trends of female Elephant Seals breeding on the Courbet Peninsula, îles Kerguelen. Polar Biol 34, 319–328 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0881-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0881-1