Skip to main content
Log in

Deschampsia antarctica Desv. primary photochemistry performs differently in plants grown in the field and laboratory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary photochemistry of photosystem II (F v/F m) of the Antarctic hair grass Deschampsia antarctica growing in the field (Robert Island, Maritime Antarctic) and in the laboratory was studied. Laboratory plants were grown at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 180 μmol m−2 s−1 and an optimal temperature (13 ± 1.5°C) for net photosynthesis. Subsequently, two groups of plants were exposed to low temperature (4 ± 1.5°C day/night) under two levels of PPFD (180 and 800 μmol m−2 s−1) and a control group was kept at 13 ± 1.5°C and PPFD of 800 μmol m−2 s−1. Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured during several days in field plants and weekly in the laboratory plants. Statistically significant differences were found in F v/F m (=0.75–0.83), F 0 and F m values of field plants over the measurement period between days with contrasting irradiances and temperature levels, suggesting that plants in the field show high photosynthetic efficiency. Laboratory plants under controlled conditions and exposed to low temperature under two light conditions showed significantly lower F v/F m and F m. Moreover, they presented significantly less chlorophyll and carotenoid content than field plants. The differences in the performance of the photosynthetic apparatus between field- and laboratory-grown plants indicate that measurements performed in ex situ plants should be interpreted with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Fv/Fm:

Primary photochemical efficiency of PS II

F m :

Maximum fluorescence

F v :

Variable fluorescence

F 0 :

Minimum fluorescence

PS II:

Photosystem II

LT:

Low temperature treatments

LT-180:

Low temperature + PPFD of 180 μmol m−2 s−1

LT-800:

Low temperature + PPFD of 800 μmol m−2 s−1

FP:

Field plants

CO-180:

13°C + PPFD of 180 μmol m−2 s−1

References

  • Alberdi M, Bravo LA, Gutiérrez A et al (2002) Ecophysiology of Antarctic vascular plants. Physiol Plant 115:479–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman O, Demmig B (1987) Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristic at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo LA, Ulloa N, Zúñiga GE et al (2001) Cold resistance in Antarctic angiosperms. Physiol Plant 111:55–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova-Katny MA, Bravo LA, Molina-Montenegro M, Corcuera LJ, Cavieres LA (2007) Photosynthetic performance of Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. (Caryophyllaceae) in a high-elevation site of the Andes of Central Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 80:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Casaretto JA, Corcuera LJ, Serey I, Zuñiga G (1994) Size structure of tussocks of a population of Deschampsia antarctica Desv. in Robert Island, Maritime Antarctic. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 44:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JA, Smith RIL (1988) Phosynthesis and respiration of Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia antarctica from the Maritime Antarctic. Br Antarct Surv Bull 81:43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Geringhausen U, Bräutigam K, Mustafa O, Peter HU (2003) Expansion of vascular plants on an Antarctic island—a consequence of climate change? In: Huiskes AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Schorno RML, van der Vies SM, Wolf WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AD (1993) Water as a limiting factor in the Antarctic terrestrial environment: a biogeographical síntesis. Arct Alp Res 25:308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AD (1999) Modeling the determinants of species distributions in Antarctica. Arct Antarct Alp Res 31:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komárková V, Poncet S, Poncet J (1985) Two native Antarctic vascular plants, Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis: a new southernmost locality and other localities in the Antarctic peninsula area. Arct Alp Res 17:401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komárková V, Poncet S, Poncet J (1990) Additional and revisited localities of vascular plants Deschampsia antarctica Desv. and Colobathus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. in the Antarctic peninsula area. Arct Alp Res 22:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner C (1999) Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, p 506

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler H, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 603:591–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Long SP, Humpries S (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:662–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütz C (1996) Avoidance of photoinhibition and examples of photodestruction in high alpine Eriophorum. J Plant Physiol 148:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel N, Cornic G, Aubert S, Choler P, Bligny R, Heber U (1999) Protection against photoinhibition in the alpine plant Geum montanum. Oecologia 119:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel PO, Smith A, Keiller D (1999) Photosynthetic responses of selected Antarctic plants to solar radiation in the southern Maritime Antarctic. Polar Res 18:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DM (1970) Studies in Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. and Deschampsia antarctica Desv. II. Taxonomy, distribution and relationships. Br Antarct Surv Bull 23:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochyra R (1998) The moss flora of King George Island Antarctica. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Torres E, García A, Dinamarca J, Alberdi M, Gutierrez A, Gidekel M, Ivanov AG, Huner NPA, Corcuera LJ, Bravo LA (2004) The role of photochemical quenching and antioxidants in photoprotection of Deschampsia antarctica. Funct Plant Biol 31:731–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Torres E, Bascuñan L, Sierra A, Bravo LA, Corcuera LJ (2006) Robustness of activity of Calvin cycle enzymes after high light and low temperature conditions in Antarctic vascular plants. Polar Biol 29:909–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittermann J, Sage RF (2000) Photosynthetic performance at low temperature of Bouteloua gracilis Lag., a high-altitude C4 grass from the Rocky Mountains, USA. Plant Cell Environ 23:811–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero M, Casanova A, Iturra G, Reyes A, Montenegro G, Alberdi M (1999) Leaf anatomy of Deschampsia antarctica (Poaceae) from the Maritime Antarctic and its plastic response to changes in the growth conditions. Rev Chil Hist Nat 72:411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RIL (1994) Vascular plants as bioindicators of regional warming in Antarctica. Oecologia 99:322–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RIL (2003) The enigma of Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia Antarctica in Antarctica. In: Huiskes AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Scorno RML, van der Vies SM, Wolf WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 234–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Streb P, Feierabend J, Bligny R (1998) Divergent strategies of photoprotection in high-mountain plants. Planta 207:313–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong FS, Ruhland CT, Day TA (1999) Photosynthetic temperature response of the Antarctic vascular plants Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia antarctica. Physiol Plant 106:276–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong FS, Mueller EC, Day TA (2000) Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes. Am J Botany 87:700–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the effort of the three referees who helped us to substantially improve the manuscript before publication. This work was supported by FONDECYT (Grant 1970637), Dirección de Investigación, Universidad Austral de Chile (Grant S-96-05) and Instituto Chileno Antártico (Grant 0894). Last but not least, I would thank my husband Dr. Götz Palfner for his unrestricted support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Angélica Casanova-Katny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casanova-Katny, M.A., Zúñiga, G.E., Corcuera, L.J. et al. Deschampsia antarctica Desv. primary photochemistry performs differently in plants grown in the field and laboratory. Polar Biol 33, 477–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-009-0723-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-009-0723-1

Keywords

Navigation