Skip to main content
Log in

Composition and distribution of meiofauna, including nematode genera, in two contrasting Arctic beaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meiofauna of two tidal beaches, one exposed and one more sheltered, on Bjornoya (Bear Island) was investigated in summer 2000. Both meiofaunal densities and composition seem to be controlled by physical properties of the sediment, which in turn are controlled by exposure. The moderately and poorly sorted sediments in the sheltered beach were more abundant in terms of meiofaunal densities than the well sorted sediments in the exposed beach (254–481 individuals in 10 cm2 vs 7–269 individuals in 10 cm2, respectively). In total, seven higher meiofaunal taxa were found. Turbellaria were the numerically dominant taxon in the exposed beach. In the sheltered beach, Turbellaria also dominated, followed by Nematoda and Harpacticoida. The vertical distribution of the meiofauna was in accordance with what has been reported from other intertidal beaches. Nematoda were studied in detail and their densities ranged over 0.7–7.7 individuals in 10 cm2 in the exposed beach and 2.7–186.0 individuals in 10 cm2 in the sheltered beach. Nematodes were identified to genus level and a total of eight nematode genera were found. Sediment community respiration, measured as oxygen consumption, ranged between 2.3 cm3 O2 m−2 h−1 in the exposed beach and 7.3 cm3 O2 m−2 h−1 in the sheltered beach (respectively, the equivalent of 24 mg and 75 mg of organic carbon metabolised per day). Values from the sheltered site are within the range of results registered in much warmer localities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnosti C, Jorgensen BB, Sagemann J, Thamdrup B (1998) Temperature dependance of microbial degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: polysaccharide hydrolysis, oxygen consumption, and sulfate reduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 165:59–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs S Jr (1987) Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy. Prentice Hall

  • Brown AC, McLachlan A (1990) Ecology of sandy shores. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Cannon LRG, Faubel A (1988) Turbellaria. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 273–282

  • Clarke A (1992) Is there a latitudinal cline in the sea? Trends Ecol Evol 7:286–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman N, Gason AS, Poore GCB (1997) High species richness in the shallow marine waters of south-east Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 154:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull B (1988) Ecology of the marine meiofauna. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 18–38

  • Dale NG (1974) Bacteria in intertidal sediments: factors related to their distribution. Limnol Oceanogr 19:509–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1994) Polar marine communities. Am Zool 34:9–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye AH (1979) Measurement of biological oxygen demand in sandy beaches. S Afr J Zool 14:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye AH (1980) Tidal fluctuations in biological oxygen demand in exposed sandy beaches. Estuarine Coastal Mar Sci 11:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye AH (1981) A study of benthic oxygen consumption on exposed sandy beaches. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 13:671–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein SS, Rossel J (1995) Enumeration of sandy sediment bacteria: search for optimal protocol. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 117:289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter RJ, Grassle JF (1992) Patterns of species diversity in the deep sea as a function of sediment particle size diversity. Nature 360:576–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher AG (1960) Latitudinal variation in organic diversity. Evolution 14:64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage JD (1996) Why are there so many species in deep sea sediments? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach SA (1965) Freilebende Meeresnematoden aus der Gezeitenzone von Spitzbergen. Veroeff Inst Meeresforsch Bremerhaven 2:109–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Glud RN, Holby O, Hoffmann F, Canfield DE (1998) Benthic mineralization and exchange in marine sediments (Svalbard, Norway). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 173:237–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS (1974) Animal–sediment relationship. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 12:223–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulings NC, Gray JS (1976) Physical factors controlling abundance of meiofauna on tidal and atidal beaches. Mar Biol 34:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson BO (1967) The significance of grain size and pore water content for the interstitial fauna of sandy beaches. Oikos 18:311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson BO (1968) Quantitative and experimental studies of the interstitial fauna in four Swedish sandy beaches. Ophelia 5:1–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MA (1996) Are Arctic soft-sediment macrobenthic communities impoverished? Polar Biol 16:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MA, Aschan M (1993) Latitudinal gradients in the structure of macrobenthic communities: a comparison of Arctic tropical and temperate sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 172:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop K, Griffiths CL (1982) The relative significance of bacteria, meio- and macrofauna on an exposed sandy beach. Mar Biol 66:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostka JE, Thamdrup B, Glud RN, Canfield DE (1999) Rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in permanently cold Arctic sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:7–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malan DE, McLachlan A (1991) In situ benthic oxygen fluxes in a nearshore coastal marine system: a new approach to quantify the effect of wave action. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 73:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte BM (1986) Sedimentary particle size and the ecological grain of food resources for meiobenthic copepods. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 23:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre AD, Munro ALS, Steele JH (1970) Energy flow in a sand ecosystem. In: Steele JH (ed) Marine food chains. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp 19–31

  • McLachlan A (1978) Sediment particle size and body size in meiofaunal harpacticoid copepods. S Afr J Sci 74:27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A, Erasmus T, Furstenberg JP (1977) Migrations of sandy beach meiofauna. Zool Afr 12:257–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokievsky VO (1992) Composition and distribution of intertidal meiofauna of Isfjorden, West Spitsbergen. Pol Polar Res 13:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Novitsky JA, MacSween MC (1989) Microbiology of a high energy beach sediment: evidence for an active and growing community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 52:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson E (1991) Intertidal meiofauna of four sandy beaches in Iceland. Ophelia 33:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Patching JW, Raine RCT (1983) Benthic metabolism and the supply of organic material to the sea-bed. In: MacDonald AG, Priede IG (eds) Experimental biology at sea. Academic, London, pp 311–345

  • Pfannkuche O, Thiel H (1987) Meiobenthic stocks benthic activity on the NE-Svalbard Shelf and in the Nansen Basin. Polar Biol 7:253–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 100:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepenburg D, Blackburn TH, Dorrien CF von, Gutt J, Hall POJ, Hulth S, Kendall MA, Opaliñski KW, Rachor E, Schmid MK (1995) Partitioning of benthic community respiration in the Arctic (northwestern Barents Sea). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 118:199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Radziejewska T, Stańkowska-Radziun M (1979) Intertidal meiofauna of Recherchefjorden and Malbukta, West Spitsbergen. Sarsia 64:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Rysgaard S, Thamdrup B, Risgaard-Petersen N, Fossing H, Berg P, Christensen PB, Dalsgaard T (1998) Seasonal carbon and nutrient mineralization in a high-Arctic coastal marine sediment, Young Sound, Northeast Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 175:261–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rysgaard S, Christensen PB, Sorensen MV, Funch P, Berg P (2000) Marine meiofauna, carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sandy and soft sediments of Disco Bay, West Greenland. Aquat Microb Ecol 21:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P (1972) Zonierung und jahreszeitliche Fluctuationen der interstitiellen Fauna in Sandstranden des Gebiets von Tromso (Norwegen). Mikrofauna Meeresbodens 12:81–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerhayes VS, Elton CS (1923) Contributions to the ecology of Spitsbergen and Bear Island. J Ecol 11:214–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymelfenig M, Kwaśniewski S, Węsławski JM (1995) Intertidal zone of Svalbard 2. Meiobenthos density and occurrence. Polar Biol 15:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanaverbeke J, Arbizu PM, Dahms HU, Schminke HK (1997) The metazoan meiobenthos along a depth gradient in the Arctic Laptev Sea with special attention to nematode communities. Polar Biol 18:391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhove S, Arntz W, Vincx M (1999) Comparative study of the nematode communities on the southeastern Weddell Sea shelf and slope (Antarctica). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 181:237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincx M (1996) Meiofauna in marine and freshwater sediments. In: Hall GS (ed) Methods for the examination of organismal diversity in soil and sediments. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 187–195

  • Węsławski M, Wiktor J, Zajączkowski M, Swerpel S (1993) Intertidal zone of Svalbard. 1. Macroorganism distribution and biomass. Polar Biol 13:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Węsławski M, Zajączkowski M, Wiktor J, Szymelfenig M (1997) Intertidal zone of Svalbard. 3. Littoral of a subarctic, oceanic island: Bjornoya. Polar Biol 18:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser W (1953) Beziehungen zwischen Mundhöhlengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Ark Zool 2:439–484

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Polish Committee for Scientific Research (grant number 6 PO4E 047 19). B.U.-M. wishes to express deepest thanks to the crews of two Norwegian Coastguard ships: r/v Andeness and r/v Nordkapp for their hospitality and help with transport to and from Bjornoya. Hallvard Strom from the Norsk Polarinstitutt in Tromso and Wojtek Walkusz from Institute of Oceanology PAS are gratefully acknowledged for their help in transporting frozen biological material. T.L.A.G. was financed by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT, Flemish Government). Tom Moens is gratefully acknowledged for his comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Urban-Malinga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urban-Malinga, B., Kotwicki, L., Gheskiere, T.L.A. et al. Composition and distribution of meiofauna, including nematode genera, in two contrasting Arctic beaches. Polar Biol 27, 447–457 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0618-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0618-0

Keywords

Navigation