Abstract
Identifying feasible steady state solutions of a brain energy metabolism model is an inverse problem that allows infinitely many solutions. The characterization of the non-uniqueness, or the uncertainty quantification of the flux balance analysis, is tantamount to identifying the degrees of freedom of the solution. The degrees of freedom of multi-compartment mathematical models for energy metabolism of a neuron–astrocyte complex may offer a key to understand the different ways in which the energetic needs of the brain are met. In this paper we study the uncertainty in the solution, using techniques of linear algebra to identify the degrees of freedom in a lumped model, and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in its extension to a spatially distributed case. The interpretation of the degrees of freedom in metabolic terms, more specifically, glucose and oxygen partitioning, is then leveraged to derive constraints on the free parameters to guarantee that the model is energetically feasible. We demonstrate how the model can be used to estimate the stoichiometric energy needs of the cells as well as the household energy based on the measured oxidative cerebral metabolic rate of glucose and glutamate cycling. Moreover, our analysis shows that in the lumped model the net direction of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the cells can be deduced from the glucose partitioning between the compartments. The extension of the lumped model to a spatially distributed multi-compartment setting that includes diffusion fluxes from capillary to tissue increases the number of degrees of freedom, requiring the use of statistical sampling techniques. The analysis of the distributed model reveals that some of the conclusions valid for the spatially lumped model, e.g., concerning the LDH activity and glucose partitioning, may no longer hold.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attwell D, Laughlin SB (2001) An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21:1133–1145
Aubert A, Costalat R (2002) A model of the coupling between brain electrical activity, metabolism and hemodynamics: application to the interpretation of functional neuroimaging. NeuroImage 17:1162–1181
Aubert A, Costalat R (2005) Interaction between astrocytes and neurons studied using a mathematical model of compartmentalized energy metabolism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25:1476–1490
Calvetti D, Cheng Y, Somersalo E (2015) A spatially distributed computational model of brain cellular metabolism. J Theor Biol 376:48–65
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2007) Introduction to Bayesian Scientific Computing – Ten Lectures on Subjective Computing. Springer Verlag,
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2011) Dynamic activation model for glutamatergic neurovascular unit. J Theor Biol 264:12–29
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2012) Ménage à trois: the role of neurotransmitters in the energy metabolism of astrocytes, glutamatergic, and GABAergic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32(2012):1472–1483
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2013) Quantitative in silico analysis of neurotransmitter pathways under steady state conditions. Frontiers in Endochrinol 4:137
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2015) Life sciences through mathematical models. Rend Fis Accad Lincei 26(Suppl 2):S193–S201
Chih CP, Roberts EL (2003) Energy Substrates for Neurons During Neural Activity; A Critical Review of the Astrocyte-Neuron Lactate Shuttle Hypothesis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23:1263–1281
Cloutier M, Bolger FB, Lowry JP, Wellstead P (2009) An integrative dynamic model of brain energy metabolism using in vivo neurochemical measurements. J Comput Neurosci 27:391414
Di Nuzzo M, Giove F, Maraviglia B (2010) A biochemical framework for modeling the functional metabolism of the human brain. Biophys Bioeng Letters 2:1–26
Di Nuzzo M, Mangia S, Maraviglia B, Giove F (2010) Changes in glucose uptake rather than lactate shuttle take center stage in subserving neuroenergetics: evidence from mathematical modeling. J Cereb Blood flow Metab 30:586–602
Gjedde A, Marrett S, Vafaee M (2002) Oxidative and nonoxidative metabolism of excited neurons and astrocytes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22:114
Gjedde A (2007) Coupling of brain function to metabolism: Evaluation of energy requirements. In: Lajtha A (ed) Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology, 3rd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Gruetter R, Seaquist ER, Ugurbil K (2001) A mathematical model of compartmentalized neurotransmitter metabolism in the human brain. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E100–E112
Harris JJ, Jolivet R, Attwell D (2012) Synaptic energy use and supply. Neuron 75:762–777
Heino J, Tunyan K, Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2007) Bayesian flux balance analysis applied to skeletal muscle metabolic model. J Theor Biol 248:91–110
Heino J, Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2010) Metabolica: a statistical research tool for analyzing metabolic networks. Comput Method Programs Biomed 97:151–167
Henriquez CS (1992) Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 21:1–77
Hertz L, Peng L, Dienel GA (2007) Energy metabolism in astrocytes: high rate of oxidative metabolism and spatiotemporal dependence on glycolysis/glycogenolysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27:21949
Howarth C, Gleeson P, Attwell D (2012) Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum. Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:12221232
Hyder F, Patel AB, Gjedde A, Rothman DL, Behar KL, Shulman RG (2006) Neuronal-glial glucose oxidation and glutamatergic-GABAergic function. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:865877
Jolivet R, Allaman I, Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ, Weber B (2010) Comment on recent modeling studies of astrocyte neuron metabolic interactions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:1982–1986
Kauffman KJ, Prakesh P, Edwards JS (2003) Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:491496
Lebon V, Petersen KF, Cline GW, Shen J, Mason GF, Dufour S, Behar KL, Shulman GI, Rothman DL (2002) Astroglial contribution to brain energy metabolism in humans revealed by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: elucidation of the dominant pathway for neurotransmitter glutamate repletion and measurement of astrocytic oxidative metabolism. J Neurosci 22:152331
Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L, Rothman DL, Shulman RG (1999) Energy on demand. Science 283:496–497
Massucci FA, Di Nuzzo M, Giove F, Maraviglia B, Castillo IP, Marinari E, De Martino A (2013) Energy metabolism and glutamate-glutamine cycle in the brain: a stoichiometric modeling perspective. BMC Syst Biol 7:103–117
Occhipinti R, Somersalo E, Calvetti D (2010) Energetics of inhibition: insights with a computational model of the human GABAergic neuron-astrocyte cellular complex. Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:183446
Papin JA, Stelling J, Price ND, Klamt S, Shuster S, Palsson BO (2004) Comparison of network-based pathway analysis methods. Trends Biotechnol 22:400405
Pellerin L, Bouzier Sore AK, Aubert A, Serres S, Merle M, Costalat R, Magistretti PJ (2007) Activity-dependent regulation of energy metabolism by astrocytes: an update. Glia 55:1251–1262
Schilling CH, Letscher D, Palsson BO (2000) Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. J Theor Biol 203:229–248
Shen J, Peterson KF, Behar KL, Brown P, Nixon TW, Mason GF, Petroff OA, Shulman GI, Shulman RG, Rothman DL (1999) Determination of the rate of the glutamate/ glutamine cycle in human brain by in vivo 13C NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:823540
Shulman RG, Hyder F, Rothman DL (2014) Insights from neuroenergetics into the interpretation of functional neuroimaging: an alternative empirical model for studying the brain’s support of behavior. J Cerb Blood Flow Metab 34:1721–1735
Sibson NR, Dhankhar A, Mason GF, Rothman DL, Behar KL, Shulman RG (1998) Stoichiometric coupling of brain glucose metabolism and glutamatergic neuronal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:316321
Simpson IA, Carruthers A, Vannucci SJ (2007) Supply and demand in cerebral energy metabolism: the role of nutrient transporters. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27:176691
Somersalo E, Cheng Y, Calvetti D (2012) The metabolism of neurons and astrocytes through mathematical models. Ann Biomed Eng 40:2328–2344
Wiback SJ, Famili I, Greenberg HJ, Palsson BO (2004) Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space. J Theor Biol 228:437–447
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work of Daniela Calvetti was partly supported by Grant Number 246665 from the Simons Foundation, and the work of Erkki Somersalo was partly supported by NSF Grant DMS 1016183. Daniela Calvetti and Erkki Somersalo were partly supported by NIH, grant 1U01GM111251-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calvetti, D., Cheng, Y. & Somersalo, E. Uncertainty quantification in flux balance analysis of spatially lumped and distributed models of neuron–astrocyte metabolism. J. Math. Biol. 73, 1823–1849 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1011-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1011-7
Keywords
- Brain energy metabolism
- Bayesian flux balance analysis
- Lactate shuttle
- Distributed model
- Glucose partitioning