Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous cervical disc decompression

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cervical disc nucleoplasty is a significant and clinically demonstrated innovation in percutaneous disc decompression in case of non-herniated disc protrusions or prolpase. It allows a percutaneous decompression via a 19-gauge needle under utilization of the Coblation® technique and under C-arm control. Until now the patients suffering of a cervicobrachialgia in cause of a disc prolapse had only the therapeutical solution between conservative treatment and monosegmental spondylodesis or disc prosthesis of the mentioned motion segment.

Methods

We wanted to demonstrate a new and practicable anatomical pathway for reaching the cervical disc prolapse comparable to the technique for discography of the cervical spine. The introducer needle is advanced into the disc under fluoroscopic guidance using a standard anterior–lateral approach. The controller delivers radiofrequency energy to quickly ablate tissue at temperatures between 50° and 60°C. The decompression will be done in ablation mode by rotating the device through 180° for 5 s in the posterior, medial and ventral third of the cervical disc. After failed conservative treatment over an average time period of 3 months we treated 26 patients with a contained herniated prolapse or protrusion with radicular arm pain by percutaneous decompression under utilization of the Coblation® technique with a controlled energy plasma-mediated field. A randomized control group of 30 patients was treated alone conservatively with medical and physical therapy in the same period.

Results

The average preoperative VAS was 8.8. With a follow-up time of 2-years we found an average pain reduction with the visual pain score (VAS) of 2.3 who had a further check-up. The VAS was checked 24 h, 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. No complications with this method were seen. Comparable to the surgically treated group the conservative patients have had a VAS of 8.4. Under using conservative treatment with physical therapy, physiotherapy, analgetics and perineural injections we have had a diminution of the VAS to 5.1 after 2 years.

Conclusion

The percutaneous decompression of the cervical disc protrusion with the Perc DC®—Spine Wand by using the Coblation mode is a quick and safe procedure. Furthermore, one may state a persistent pain relief in the follow-up time up to 2 years after the percutaneous decompression of the disc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S et al (2007) Interventional technique: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 10(1):7–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YC, Sang-Heon L, Chen D (2003) Intradiscal pressure study of percutaneous disc decompression with nucleoplasty in human cadavers. Spine 28(7):661–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coppes MH, Marani E, Thomeer RT et al (1997) Innervation of painful lumbar discs. Spine 22:2342–2349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dabezies EJ (1988) Safety and efficacy of chymopapain in the treatment of sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposis—results of a randomized double-blind study. Spine 13:561–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RD (1982) Chymopapain for the treatment of intervertebral disc herniation—a preliminary report of a double blind study. Spine 7:608–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman BJ, Mehdian R (2008) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy and nucleoplasty: what is the current evidence? Curr Pain Headache Rep 12(1):14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hijikata S (1975) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. A new concept and 12 years experience. Clin Orthop 238:9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambin P, Brager MD (1987) Percutaneous posterolateral discectomy: anatomy and mechanism. Clin Orthop 223:145–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kambin P, Schaffer JL (1989) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: review of 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop 238:24–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MS, Cooper G, Lutz GE, Doty SB (2003) Histological characterization of coblation nucleoplasty performed on sheep intervertebral discs. Pain Physician 6(4):439–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Yan DL, Gao LB, Tan PX, Zhang ZH, Zhang Z (2006) Comparison percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty and cervical discectomy for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 44(12):822–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi PV, Cabezas D, Cesaroni A (2005) Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty using coblation technology. Clinical results in fifty consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir 92:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nerubay J, Caspi I, Levinkopf M et al (1997) Perutaneous laser nucleolysis of the intervertebral lumbar disc: an experimental study. Clin Orthop 337:42–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Hochschuler RH (1994) Laser disc decompression: the importance of proper patient selection. Spine 19:2054–2058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O′Neill C, Lotz L et al (2004) Percutaneous plasma discectomy stimulates repair in injured porcine intervertebral discs. Spine J 4:88–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postacchini F (1999) Management of herniation of the lumbar disc. J Bone Joint Surg B-81:567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal JS, Saal JA (2000) Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with thermal intradiscal catheter: a preliminary report. Spine 25:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki M, Takahashi T, Miyahara K et al (2001) Effects of chondroitinase ABC on intradiscal pressure in sheep: an in vivo study. Spine 26:463–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharps L, Isaac Z (2002) Percutaneous disc decompression using nucleoplasty. Pain Physician 5(2):121–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V (2004) Percutaneous disc decompression for the treatment of chronic atypical smaller discs. Pain Physician 7:115–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Piryani C, Liao K et al (2002) Percutaneous disc decompression using Coblation (Nucleoplasty™). Pain Physician 6(3):273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LW (1963) Enzyme dissolution of nucleus pulposis in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 206:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalder KR, Woloszko J, Brown IG et al (2001) Repetitive plasma dischargers in saline solutions. Appl Phys Lett 79(27):4503–4505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Clinic Hennef/Sieg, Adenauerplatz 1, 53773, Hennef, Germany

    Klaus Birnbaum

Authors
  1. Klaus Birnbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Birnbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birnbaum, K. Percutaneous cervical disc decompression. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 379–387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0462-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0462-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation