Skip to main content
Log in

Early Experience with the Modificated Approach of Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for High Transsphincteric Fistula

  • Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transsphincteric fistulotomy is associated with a variable degree of fecal incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57–94 %. We evaluated a modified approach from it. Our aim was to review the preliminary results using this technique for high transsphincteric fistula.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of high transsphincteric fistula patients who underwent the modified LIFT (mLIFT) procedure was performed. The surgical technique involved making a lateral incision from external opening to intersphincteric groove; ligation of the fistula tract within the intersphincteric space; and complete excision of the distal part of fistula from external opening to external sphincter. The patients were followed for healing time, recurrence, fecal continence disturbance, and any other associated morbidity.

Results

Over a 2-year period, 43 patients with high transsphincteric anal fistula were treated by mLIFT technique. Four patients were lost at follow-up. In a mean follow-up of 15 months, 34/39 (87.2 %) of the patients achieved primary or secondary healing. Five patients had persistent symptoms and required further surgical treatment. The second procedures were successful, and finally resulting in an overall healing rate of 100 %. The Wexner incontinence scale was 0 (0–20) both before and at 6 months after the procedure.

Conclusions

The mLIFT procedure for high transsphincteric fistula appeared to effectively preserve continence and achieved a comparable success rate to other sphincter-preserving techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H et al (1984) Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 27:593–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J III, Hyman N et al (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48:1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumetti J, Abcarian A, Quinteros F et al (2012) Evolution of treatment of fistula in ano. World J Surg 36:1162–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eitan A, Koliada M, Bickel A (2009) The use of the loose seton technique as a definitive treatment for recurrent and persistent high trans-sphincteric anal fistulas: a long-term outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1116–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tozer P, Sala S, Cianci V et al (2013) Fistulotomy in the tertiary setting can achieve high rates of fistula cure with an acceptable risk of deterioration in continence. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1960–1965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arroyo A, Pérez-Legaz J, Moya P et al (2012) Fistulotomy and sphincter reconstruction in the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano: long-term clinical and manometric results. Ann Surg 255:935–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 10:420–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soltani A, Kaiser AM (2010) Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn’s fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:486–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawes DA, Efron JE, Abbas M et al (2008) Early experience with the bioabsorbable anal fistula plug. World J Surg 32:1157–1159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heydari A, Attinà GM, Merolla E et al (2013) Bioabsorbable synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 56:774–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chew MH, Lee PJ, Koh CE et al (2013) Appraisal of the LIFT and BIOLIFT procedure: initial experience and short-term outcomes of 33 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1489–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rojanasakul A (2009) LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula in ano. Tech Coloproctol 13:237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C et al (2007) Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai 90:581–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleier JI, Moloo H, Goldberg SM (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 53:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a Sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyman N, O’Brien S, Osler T (2009) Outcomes after fistulotomy: results of a prospective, multicenter regional study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:2022–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vasilevsky C, Gordon PH (1985) Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 28:225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1984) The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 27:126–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan KK, Tan IJ, Lim FS et al (2011) The anatomy of failures following the ligation of intersphincteric tract technique for anal fistula: a review of 93 patients over 4 years. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1368–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen TA, Liu KY, Yeh CY (2012) High ligation of the fistula tract by lateral approach: a modified sphincter-saving technique for advanced anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 14:627–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abcarian AM, Estrada JJ, Park J et al (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: early results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 55:778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwandner O (2011) Obesity is a negative predictor of success after surgery for complex anal fistula. BMC Gastroenterol 11:61–62

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mushaya C, Bartlett L, Schulze B et al (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract compared with advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulas requiring initial seton drainage. Am J Surg 204:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KK, Alsuwaigh R, Tan AM et al (2012) To LIFT or to flap? Which surgery to perform following seton insertion for high anal fistula? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1273–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All of the authors, Ye F, Tang CL, Wang DY and Zheng SS declared no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shusen Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, F., Tang, C., Wang, D. et al. Early Experience with the Modificated Approach of Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for High Transsphincteric Fistula. World J Surg 39, 1059–1065 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2888-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2888-1

Keywords

Navigation