Skip to main content
Log in

Socially induced delayed primiparity in brown bears Ursus arctos

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reproductive suppression through behavioral or physiological means is common in group-living and cooperative breeding mammals, but to our knowledge it has not been shown in wild large carnivores other than those with a clear form of social organization. Brown bear (Ursus arctos) females form matrilinear assemblages with related females using a common and largely exclusive area. Behavioral reproductive suppression might develop due to a hierarchical system among females within a matrilinear assemblage or due to inbreeding avoidance, because male brown bears can overlap with their daughters. We tested whether natal dispersal influenced the age of primiparity. We predicted that emigrant females, geographically removed from maternal or paternal influence, would reproduce earlier than philopatric females. The average age of primiparity was 4.3 years in females that dispersed outside their mother’s home range (n=8) and 5.2 years in philopatric females (n=10). Only the overlap with the mother’s home range, and not body size, body mass, growth, local population density, or overlap with the father’s home range, had a significant influence on the age of primiparity. The ultimate role of reproductive suppression for brown bears is likely to avoid inbreeding or to minimize resource competition. Due to the low risk of inbreeding and frequent exposure of young females to unrelated males, we conclude that resource competition within female hierarchies causes reproductive suppression in young females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnemo JM, Ahlqvist P, Andersen R, Bertnsen F, Ericsson G, Odden J, Brunberg S, Segerström P, Swenson JE (2006) Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia. Wildl Biol 12:109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellemain E (2004) Genetics of the Scandinavian brown bear (Ursus arctos): implications for biology and conservation. Ph.D. thesis. Agricultural University of Norway

  • Bellemain E, Swenson JE, Tallmon DA, Brunberg S, Taberlet P (2005) Estimating population size of elusive animals using DNA from hunter-collected feces: comparing four methods for brown bears. Conserv Biol 19:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellemain E, Zedrosser A, Manel S, Waits LP, Taberlet P, Swenson JE (2006) The dilemma of female mate selection in the brown bear, a species with sexually selected infanticide. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard BM, Knight RR (1991) Movements of Yellowstone grizzly bears. Biol Conserv 58:41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M, Klein F, Loison A (2002) Sex- and age-dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest. Ecography 25:446–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brant CL, Schwab TM, Vandenbergh JG, Schaefer RL, Solomon NG (1998) Behavioural suppression of female pine voles after replacement of the breeding male. Anim Behav 55:615–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnel FL, Tait DEN (1981) Population dynamics of bears—implications. In: Fowler CV, Smith TD (eds) Dynamics of large mammals populations. Wiley, New York, pp 75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MM, Galef BG Jr (2001) Socially induced infertility: familial effects on reproductive development of female Mongolian gerbils. Anim Behav 62:897–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark MM, Galef BG Jr (2002) Socially induced delayed reproduction in female Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus): is there anything special about dominant females? J Comp Psychol 116:363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke FM, Miethe GH, Bennett NC (2001) Reproductive suppression in female Damaraland mole-rats Cryptomys damarensis: dominant control or self-restraint? Proc R Soc Lond B 268:899–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead JJ, Sumner JS, Mitchell JA (1995) The grizzly bears of Yellowstone: their ecology in the Yellowstone ecosystem, 1959–1992. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel SR, Creel NM (1991) Energetics, reproductive suppression and obligate communal breeding in carnivores. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Macdonald D (1995) Sociality, group size, and reproductive suppression among carnivores. Adv Study Behav 24:203–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahle B, Swenson JE (2003a) Home ranges in adult Scandinavian brown bears Ursus arctos: effect of mass, sex, reproductive status, population density and habitat type. J Zool 260:329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahle B, Swenson JE (2003b) Family break-up in brown bears; are young forced to leave? J Mammal 84:536–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalerum F, Creel S, Hall SB (2006) Behavioural and endocrine correlates of reproductive failure in social aggregations of captive wolverines. J Zool (in press) DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00116.x

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1998) Maternal investment and factors affecting offspring size in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 245:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley SD, Robbins CT (1995) Lactation, hibernation and weight dynamics of American black and grizzly bears. Can J Zool 73:2216–2222

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson T, Lucherini M, Wishart WD (1995) Life-history consequences of variation in age of primiparity in bighorn ewes. Ecology 76:871–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Jorgenson T (1998) Mass and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindström J, Albon SD (2001) Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol 70:721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gende SM, Quinn TP (2004) The relative importance of prey density and social dominance in determining energy intake by bears feeding on Pacific salmon. Can J Zool 82:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn LP, Miller LE (1980) Seasonal movement of an Alaskan Peninsula brown bear population. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 4:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackländer K, Möstl E, Arnold W (2003) Reproductive suppression in female Alpine marmots, Marmota marmota. Anim Behav 65:1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessing P, Aumiller L (1994) Observations of conspecific predation by brown bears, Ursus arctos, in Alaska. Can Field-Nat 108:332–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand GV, Schwartz CC, Robbins CT, Hanley TA (2000) Effect of hibernation and reproductive status on body mass and condition of coastal brown bears. J Wildl Manage 64:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer H, East ML (2003) Behavioral processes and costs of co-existence in female spotted hyenas: a life history perspective. Evol Ecol 17:315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee (1987) Grizzly bear compendium. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin X (1994) Natal philopatry, competition for resources, and inbreeding avoidance in Townsend’s vole (Microtus townsendii). Ecology 75:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Ball FG, Hough NG (1980) The evaluation of home range size and configuration using radio tracking data. In: Amlaner CJ, Macdonald DW (eds) A handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 405–422

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire B, Getz LL (1991) Response of young female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) to non-resident males: implications for population regulation. Can J Zool 69:1348–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan B (1994) Density-dependent population regulation of brown bears. In: Taylor M (ed) Density-dependent population regulation in black, brown, and polar bears, monograph series no. 3. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, pp 15–24

  • McLellan BN, Hovey FW (2001) Natal dispersal of grizzly bears. Can J Zool 79:838–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1970) The wolf. The ecology and behavior of an endangered species. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus P, Broussard DR, Murie JO, Dobson FS (2004) Age of primiparity and implications of early reproduction on life history in female Columbian ground squirrels. J Anim Ecol 73:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oli MK, Armitage KB (2003) Sociality and individual fitness in yellow-bellied marmots: insights from a long-term study (1962–2001). Oecologia 136:543–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasitschniak-Arts M (1993) Ursus arctos. Mamm Species 439:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor MF, McLellan B, Strobeck C, Barclay RMR (2004) Gender-specific dispersal distances of grizzly bears estimated by genetic analysis. Can J Zool 82:1108–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliainen E, Luukkonen Y, Hietajärvi T (1983) Formation of dominance hierarchy among wild brown bears (Ursus arctos). Z Säugetierkd 49:58–59

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org

  • Reiter J, LeBoef BJ (1991) Life history consequences of variation in age at primiparity in northern elephant seals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Engen S, Swenson JE, Bakke Ø, Sandegren F (1997) Levedyktighetsanalyser av skandinavisk brunbjørn. NINA Fagrapp 25:1–41 (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Engen S, Swenson JE, Bakke Ø, Sandegren F (1998) Assessing the viability of Scandinavian brown bear, Ursus arctos, populations: the effects of uncertain parameter estimates. Oikos 83:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC, Miller SD, Haroldson MA (2003) Grizzly bear. In: Feldhammer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation, 2nd edn. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 556–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillero-Zubiri C, Gottelli D, McDonald DW (1996) Male philopatry, extra-pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian wolves, Canis simensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg KH, Bellemain E, Drageseth O-M, Taberlet P, Swenson JE (2006) An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size. Biol Conserv 128:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon NG, Brant CL, Callahan PA, Steinly BA Jr (2001) Mechanisms of reproductive suppression in female pine voles (Microtus pinetorum). Reproduction 122:297–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stringham SF (1980) Possible effects of hunting on the grizzly/brown bear. Intern Conf Bear Res Manage 4:337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringham SF (1990) Grizzly bear reproductive rate relative to body size. Intern Conf Bear Res Manage 8:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Støen OG, Bellemain E, Sæbø S, Swenson JE (2005) Kin-related spatial structure in brown bears Ursus arctos. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Støen OG, Zedrosser A, Sæbø S, Swenson JE (2006) Inversely density dependent dispersal in brown bears Ursus arctos. Oecologia (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s00442006-0348-5

  • Svendsen GE, White MM (1997) Body mass and first-time reproduction in female chipmunks (Tamias striatus). Can J Zool 75:1891–1895

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Bjärvall A, Söderberg A, Wabakken P, Franzén (1994) Size, trend, distribution and conservation of the brown bear Ursus arctos population in Sweden. Biol Conserv 70:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson JE, Wabakken P, Sandegren F, Bjärvall A, Franzen R, Söderberg A (1995) The near extinction and recovery of brown bears in Scandinavia in relation to the bear management policies in Norway and Sweden. Wildl Biol 1:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Söderberg A (1998) Geographic expansion of an increasing brown bear population: evidence for presaturation dispersal. J Anim Ecol 67:819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser SK, Barash DP (1983) Reproductive suppression among female mammals: implications for biomedicine and sexual selection theory. Q Rev Biol 58:513–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman JM (2002) Delayed maturity, group fission and limits of group size in female Cape ground squirrels (Sciuridae: Xerus inauris). J Zool 256:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Weladji R, Steinheim G, Post E, Holand O, Adnoy T (2003) Effect of pre-oestrus body weight on lambing success in primiparous sheep (Ovis aries). Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci 53:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggett D, Boag DA (1990) The resident fitness hypothesis and dispersal by yearling female Columbian ground squirrels. Can J Zool 70:1984–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe R, MacDonald DW (1995) Female/female competition in European badgers Meles meles: effects on breeding success. J Anim Ecol 64:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1992) Parents suppress reproduction and stimulate dispersal in opposite-sex juvenile white-footed mice. Nature 359:409–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1997) Population regulation in mammals: an evolutionary perspective. J Anim Ecol 66:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedrosser A, Dahle B, Swenson JE (2006) Adult female size in brown bears: the effects of population density, heterozygosity, food conditions and size as a yearling. J Mammal (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management, World Wildlife Fund Sweden, the Research Council of Norway, and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Andreas Zedrosser was financially supported by the Austrian Science Fund Project P16236-B06. We thank the personnel in the Scandinavian Brown Bear Research Project for their assistance in the field and Orsa Communal Forest for field support. We thank Ali Nawaz and Bjørn Dahle for comments on an earlier draft and Solve Sæbø for statistical help. All capture and handling of bears reported in this paper complied with the contemporary laws regulating the treatment of animals in Sweden and Norway and was approved by the appropriate management agencies and ethical committees in both countries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon E. Swenson.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Festa-Bianchet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Støen, OG., Zedrosser, A., Wegge, P. et al. Socially induced delayed primiparity in brown bears Ursus arctos . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0231-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0231-z

Keywords

Navigation