Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cauda equina syndrome—the questions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cauda equina syndrome is a devastating condition often following an innocent pathology in the form of a disc prolapse. The effect on sufferers, however, can be lifelong. It is necessary to make a diagnosis as expeditiously as possible via adequate history, clinical examination and appropriate imaging to offer treatment, in the form of decompressive surgery within 48 hours. It is extremely important to communicate adequately with the patient and their family recording all the relevant details including those of expected outcome. National guidelines are likely to be of value to clinicians and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapetanakis S, Chaniotakis C, Kazakos C, Papathanasiou JV (2017) Cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation: a review of literature. Folia Med 59(4):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Todd NV, Dickson RA (2016) Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 30(5):p518–p522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner A, Gardner E, Morley T (2011) Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position. Eur Spine J 20:690–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain SA, Gullan RW, Chitnavis BP (2003) Cauda equina syndrome: outcome and implications for management. Br J Neurosurg 17(2):164–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cribb GL, Jaffray DC, Cassar-Pullicino VN (2007) Observations on the natural history of massive lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B(6):782–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Podnar S (2010) Cauda equina lesions as a complication of spinal surgery. Eur Spine J:451–457

  7. Todd NV (2010) For debate – guidelines for the management of suspected cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 24(4):387–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verhagen AP, Downie A, Popal N, Maher C, Koes B (2016) Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review. Eur Spine J 25:2788–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesan M, Uzoigwe CE, Perianayagam G, Braybrooke JR, Newey ML (2012) Is cauda equina syndrome linked with obesity? J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B(11):1551–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cushnie D, Urqhart JC, Gurr KR, Siddiqi F, Bailey CS (2018) Obesity and spinal epidural lipomatosis in cauda equina syndrome. Spine J 18(3):407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gooding WT, Higgins MA, Calthorpe DAD (2013) Does rectal examination have any value in the clinical diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome? Br J Neurosurg 27(2):156–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell DA, Collie D, Statham PF (2007) Cauda equina syndrome – what is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning? Br J Neurosurg 21(2):201–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balasubramanian K, Kalsi P, Greenough C, Seetharam MPK (2010) Reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 24(4):383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoeritzauer I, Doherty CM, Thomson S, Kee R, Carson A, Eames N, Stone J (2015) ‘Scan-negative’ cauda equina syndrome: evidence of functional disorder from a prospective case series. Br J Neurosurg 29(2):178–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thangarajah T, O’Donoghue D, Pillay R (2011) Today or tomorrow? A retrospective analysis of the clinical indications used to request urgent magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(1):7–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Todd NV (2015) Neurological deterioration in cauda equina syndrome is probably progressive and continuous. Implications for clinical management. Br J Neurosurg 29(5):630–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gleave JRW, Macfarlane R (2002) Cauda equina syndrome: what is the relationship between timing of surgery and outcome? Br J Neurosurg 16(4):325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qureshi A, Sell P (2007) Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome. Eur Spine J 16:2143–2151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Todd NV (2005) Cauda equina syndrome: the timing of surgery probably does influence outcome. Br J Neurosurg 19(4):301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Todd NV (2011) Causes and outcomes of cauda equina syndrome in medico-legal practice: a single neurosurgical experience of 40 consecutive cases. Br J Neurosurg 25(4):503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Holland N (2016) World radiography day: the role of MRI scans in the diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. Penningtons Manches solicitors, Posted online: 08/11/2016

  22. Crocker M, Fraser G, Wilson J, Chitnavis EP, Thomas NW (2008) The value of interhospital transfer and emergency MRI for suspected cauda Equina syndrome: a 2-year retrospective study. RCS Ann 90(6):513–516

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Todd N (2017) Guidelines for cauda equina syndrome. Red flags and white flags, systematic review and implications for triage. Br J Neurosurg 31(3):p336–p339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hussain MM, Razak AA, Hassan SS, Choudhari KA, Spink GM (2018) Time to implement a national referral pathway for suspected cauda equina syndrome: review and outcome of 250 referrals. Br J Neurosurg 32(3):p264–p268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Germon T, Ahuja S, Casey ATH, Todd NV, Rai A (2015) British Association of Spine Surgeons standards of care for cauda equina syndrome. Spine J 15:2S–4S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Todd NV (2018) Quantifying the clinical aspects of the cauda equina syndrome – the cauda scale (TCS). Br J Neurosurg 32(3):260–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thakur JD, Storey C, Kalakoti P, Ahmed O, Dossani RH, Menger RP, Sharma K, Sun H, Nanda A (2017) Early intervention in cauda equina syndrome associated with better outcomes: a myth or reality? Insights from the Nationwide inpatient sample database (2005-2011). Spine J 17:1435–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hampshire Clinic, Basing Road, Basingtoke, RG24 7AL, UK

    Andrew Quaile

Authors
  1. Andrew Quaile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Quaile.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quaile, A. Cauda equina syndrome—the questions. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 957–961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4208-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4208-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation