Abstract
Lateral ankle pain is common with overuse and sports-related injuries and may cause considerable morbidity. The differential diagnosis of lateral ankle pain is extensive. Disorders of the peroneal tendons should be an important consideration during interpretation of a routine ankle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). This article presents a review of the common causes of peroneal tendon pathology with particular reference to anatomy, US, and MRI features. The importance of dynamic evaluation with ultrasound is also emphasized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freire V, Guerini H, Campagna R, Moutounet L, Dumontier C, Feydy A, et al. Imaging of hand and wrist cysts: a clinical approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5):W618–28.
Yablon CM. Ultrasound-guided interventions of the foot and ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17(1):60–8.
Wang XT, Rosenberg ZS, Mechlin MB, Schweitzer ME. Normal variants and diseases of the peroneal tendons and superior peroneal retinaculum: MR imaging features. Radiographics. 2005;25(3):587–602.
Bruce WD, Christofersen MR, Phillips DL. Stenosing tenosynovitis and impingement of the peroneal tendons associated with hypertrophy of the peroneal tubercle. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(7):464–7.
Sobel M, Levy ME, Bohne WH. Congenital variations of the peroneus quartus muscle: an anatomic study. Foot Ankle. 1990;11(2):81–9.
Rademaker J, Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Colon E. Alterations in the distal extension of the musculus peroneus brevis with foot movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(3):787–9.
Sobel M, Pavlov H, Geppert MJ, Thompson FM, DiCarlo EF, Davis WH. Painful os peroneum syndrome: a spectrum of conditions responsible for plantar lateral foot pain. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(3):112–24.
Brigido MK, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Widman DS, Craig JG, Jamadar DA, et al. Radiography and US of os peroneum fractures and associated peroneal tendon injuries: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;237(1):235–41.
Clarke HD, Kitaoka HB, Ehman RL. Peroneal tendon injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(5):280–8.
Bianchi S, Delmi M, Molini L. Ultrasound of peroneal tendons. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(3):292–306.
Philbin TM, Landis GS, Smith B. Peroneal tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(5):306–17.
Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung YY, Colon E, Herraiz F. MR features of longitudinal tears of the peroneus brevis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(1):141–7.
Butler BW, Lanthier J, Wertheimer SJ. Subluxing peroneals: a review of the literature and case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1993;32(2):134–9.
Davis WH, Sobel M, Deland J, Bohne WH, Patel MB. The superior peroneal retinaculum: an anatomic study. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(5):271–5.
Oden RR. Tendon injuries about the ankle resulting from skiing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;216:63–9.
Raikin SM, Elias I, Nazarian LN. Intrasheath subluxation of the peroneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):992–9.
Weishaupt D, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Haims AH, Wapner K, Kahn M. MRI of the foot and ankle: prevalence and distribution of occult and palpable ganglia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14(4):464–71.
Costa CR, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Raiken SM. MRI of an intratendinous ganglion cyst of the peroneus brevis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(3):890–1.
Nahra ME, Bucchieri JS. Ganglion cysts and other tumor related conditions of the hand and wrist. Hand Clin. 2004;20(3):249–60. v.
Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Middleton WD, Gelberman RH, Boyer MI. Ganglia of the hand and wrist: a sonographic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(3):716–20.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from Inje University, 2011, and Pusan Paik Hospital Imaging Research Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.J., Jacobson, J.A., Kim, SM. et al. Ultrasound and MRI of the peroneal tendons and associated pathology. Skeletal Radiol 42, 1191–1200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1631-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1631-6