Abstract
There are different ways to add haptic input during walking which may affect walking balance. This study compared the use of two different haptic tools (rigid railing and haptic anchors) and investigated whether any effects on walking were the result of the added sensory input and/or the posture generated when using those tools. Data from 28 young healthy adults were collected using the Mobility Lab inertial sensor system (APDM, Oregon, USA). Participants walked with and without both haptic tools and while pretending to use both haptic tools (placebo trials), with eyes opened and eyes closed. Using the tools or pretending to use both tools decreased normalized stride velocity (p < .001–0.008) and peak medial–lateral (ML) trunk velocity (p < .001–0.001). Normalized stride velocity was slower when actually using the railing compared to placebo railing trials (p = .006). Using the anchors resulted in lower peak ML trunk velocity than the railing (p = .002). The anchors had lower peak ML trunk velocity than placebo anchors (p < .001), but there was no difference between railing and placebo railing (p > .999). These findings highlight a difference in the type of tool used to add haptic input and suggest that changes in balance control strategy resulting from using the railing are based on arm placement, where it is the posture combined with added sensory input that affects balance control strategies with the haptic anchors. These findings provide a strong framework for additional research to be conducted on the effects of haptic input on walking in populations known to have decreased walking balance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME (1992) The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults. Am J Public Health 82(7):1020–1023
Bingenheimer K, Temprado JJ, Harnagea M, Bricot N, Villani P, Berton E (2015) Effects of a light touch on fixed or mobile supports on gait parameters in visually restricted young adults. Neurosci Lett 589:176–180. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.01.054
Boonsinsukh R, Panichareon L, Phansuwan-Pujito P (2009) Light touch cue through a cane improves pelvic stability during walking in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:919–926. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.022
Boonsinsukh R, Panichareon L, Saengsirisuwan V, Phansuwan-Pujito P (2011) Clinical identification for the use of light touch cues with a cane in gait rehabilitation poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 18(Suppl 1):633–42. doi:10.1310/tsr18s01-633
Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, Foster J, Hill E, Tallis R (2001) Dual—task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age Ageing 30(4):319–323
Bruijn SM, Meijer OG, Beek PJ, van Dieën JH (2010) The effects of arm swing on human gait stability. J Exp Biol 213:3945–3952. doi:10.1242/jeb.045112
Choy NL, Brauer S, Nitz J (2003) Changes in postural stability in women aged 20–80 years. J Gerontol A-Biol 58(6):M525–M530. 10.1093/gerona/58.6.M525
Costa AAS, Manciopi PAR, Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R (2015) Haptic information provided by the “anchor system” reduces trunk sway acceleration in the frontal plane during tandem walking in older adults. Neurosci Lett 609:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.004
Coulthard JT, Treen TT, Oates AR, Lanovaz JL (2015) Evaluation of an inertial sensor system for analysis of timed-up-and-go under dual-task demands. Gait Posture 41(4):882–887. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.009
Du Pasquier RA, Blanc Y, Sinnreich M, Landis T, Burkhard P, Vingerhoets FJG (2003) The effect of aging on postural stability: a cross sectional and longitudinal study. Neurophysiol Clin 33(5):213–218. 10.1016/j.neucli.2003.09.001
Eke-Okoro ST, Gregoric M, Larsson LE (1997) Alterations in gait resulting from deliberate changes of arm-swing amplitude and phase. Clin Biomech 12(7):516–521
Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. Sage Publications Inc., California. doi:10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50012-4
Hof AL (1996) Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture 4:222–223. doi:10.1016/0966-6362(95)01057-2
Kodesh E, Falash F, Sprecher E, Dickstein R (2015) Light touch and medio-lateral postural stability during short distance gait. Neurosci Lett 584:378–81. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.048
Krasovsky T, Banina MC, Hacmon R, Feldman AG, Lamontagne A Levin MF (2012) Stability of gait and interlimb coordination in older adults. J Neurophysiol 107:2560–2569. doi:10.1152/jn.00950.2011
Kulmala J, Sihvonen S, Kallinen M, Alen M, Kiviranta I, Sipilä S (2007) Balance confidence and functional balance in relation to falls in older persons with hip fracture history. J Geriatr Phys Ther 30:114–20. doi:10.1519/00139143-200712000-00006
Lee SW, Verghese J, Holtzer R, Mahoney JR, Oh-Park M (2014) Trunk sway during walking among older adults: norms and correlation with gait velocity. Gait Posture 40:676–681. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.023
Losa M, Fusco A, Morone G, Paolucci S (2012) Effects of visual deprivation on gait dynamic stability. Sci World J 2012:1–7. doi:10.1100/2012/974560
Mancini M, King L, Salarian A, Holmstrom L, McNames J, Horak FB (2011) Mobility Lab to assess balance and gait with synchronized body-worn sensors. J Bioneng Biomed Sci. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.S1-007
Marone J, Patel P, Hurt C, Grabiner M (2014) Frontal plane margin of stability is increased during texting while walking. Gait Posture 40:243–246. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.188
Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R, Tavares CP, Figueiredo GA, Pacheco SCM, Costa TDA (2014) Haptic anchoring and human postural control. Psychol Neurosci 7:301–318
Parachute (2015) The cost of injury in Canada. Toronto, ON. http://www.parachutecanada.org/downloads/research/Cost_of_Injury-2015.pdf. Accessed on 11, June 2016
Patel P, Lamar M, Bhatt T (2014) Effect of type of cognitive task and walking speed on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking. Neuroscience 260:140–148. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.016
Public Health Agency of Canada (2014) Seniors’ falls in Canada. Second report. Ottawa. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/publications/public/injury-blessure/seniors_falls-chutes_aines/assets/pdf/seniors_falls-chutes_aines-eng.pdf. Accessed on 18, June 2016
Rabin E, Chen J, Muratori L, DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Werner WG (2013) Haptic feedback from manual contact improves balance control in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 38:373–379. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.12.008
Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close (JCT) Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:2234–2243. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x
Shubert TE (2011) Evidence- based exercise prescription for balance and falls prevention. J Geriatr Phys Ther 34:100–108. doi:10.1519/JPT.0b013e31822938ac
Spain RI, St. George RJ, Salarian A, Mancini M, Wagner JM, Horak FB, Bourdette D (2012) Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture 35(4):573–578. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.026
Stinchcombe A, Kuran N, Powell S (2014) Seniors’ falls in Canada: second report: key highlights. Chronic Dis Inj Can 34:171–174.
von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E, Nickel VL (1995) Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 32:25–31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7760264
Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE (1990) Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther 70:340–347. doi:10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9
Yack H, Berger R (1993) Dynamic stability in the elderly: identifying a possible measure. J Gerontol. doi:10.1093/geronj/48.5.M225
Yelnik AP, Tasseel Ponche S, Andriantsifanetra C, Provost C, Calvalido A, Rougier P (2015) Walking with eyes closed is easier than walking with eyes open without visual cues: the Romberg task versus the goggle task. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 58:332–335. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.08.004
World Health Organization, WHO global report on falls in older age (2007). Switzerland. http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Falls_prevention7March.pdf?ua=1
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Branch Out Neurological Foundation. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was funded by the Branch Out Neurological Foundation studentship awarded to IH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hedayat, I., Moraes, R., Lanovaz, J.L. et al. Different haptic tools reduce trunk velocity in the frontal plane during walking, but haptic anchors have advantages over lightly touching a railing. Exp Brain Res 235, 1731–1739 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4921-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4921-8