Skip to main content
Log in

When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of active tool use in the remapping of space in hemispatial neglect patients has been extensively investigated. To date, however, there is no evidence that observing tool use can play a role in the remapping of space in hemispatial neglect patients. In this study, a patient with a severe hemispatial neglect in near but not far space and twelve healthy controls were asked to bisect near and far lines using a laser pen. The task was performed both before and immediately after sessions in which they merely observed the experimenter bisecting near and far lines with a stick. During the observation session, participants were either holding an identical stick or empty-handed. Results, in both the neglect patient and healthy controls, showed that observing the experimenter bisecting line while holding the same tool, produces a remapping of the far space into the near space. This result was particularly evident in the neglect patient where observing line-bisection task extended the spatial deficit from the near to the far space. Our results provide new empirical support to the idea that the space around us is not mapped in merely metrical terms, rather it seems to be deeply impacted by both action observation and execution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CBS = Catherine Bergego Scale; A total score of 0 is considered to indicate no neglect, a score ranging from 1 to 10 indicates mild behavioral neglect, a score of 11–20 indicates moderate neglect and a score of 21–30 indicates severe neglect.

  2. Since confidence intervals rely heavily on the central limit theorem, their estimation may be problematic when the sample data are not normally distributed and/or contain extreme values. This could be problematic in our case, as patients’ behavior tends to be variable, and because there were only eight observations for each condition. Therefore, to assess the accuracy of the reported confidence intervals, we also performed a bootstrap analysis (bias-corrected and accelerated method, 1,000,000 iterations), which provide a robust estimate of the uncertainty associated with parameter estimates (e.g., Carpenter and Bithell 2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19:1141–1164). The so calculated bias-corrected and accelerated 95 % CIs for each condition were very similar to those reported, suggesting that our estimates were not biased, and led to the same conclusions.

References

  • Ackroyd K, Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Nightingale S, Townsend S (2002) Widening the sphere of influence: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase 8:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23:658–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M (2012) Tie my hands, tie my eyes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:263–266. doi:10.1037/a0026570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergego C, Azouvi P, Samuel C et al (1995) Validation d’une échelle d’évaluation fonctionnelle de l’héminégligence dans la vie quotidienne: l’échelle CB. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 38:183–189. doi:10.1016/0168-6054(96)89317-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12:415–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A (1986) Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia 24:759–767. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90075-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch E, Davoli C, Roth N, Brockmole J, Abrams R (2012) Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance. Psychon Bull Rev 19:177–183. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0200-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bueti D, Costantini M, Forster B, Aglioti SM (2004) Uni- and cross-modal temporal modulation of tactile extinction in right brain damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 42:1689–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter J, Bithell J (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19:1141–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Lusher D, Mari M, Edwards M, Humphreys G (2002) Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: differential motor priming effects. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Bueti D, Pazzaglia M, Aglioti SM (2007) Temporal dynamics of visuo-tactile extinction within and between hemispaces. Neuropsychology 21:242–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C, Gallese V (2011) Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia 49:2658–2663. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C (2012) Does how I look at what you’re doing depend on what I’m doing? Acta Psychol 141:199–204. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowey A, Small M, Ellis S (1994) Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32:1059–1066. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90152-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH (2005) Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations. Neuropsychology 19:318–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JR, Howell DC (1998) Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. Clin Neuropsychol 12:482–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Porter S (2010) Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cogn Neuropsychol 27:245–260. doi:10.1080/02643294.2010.513967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming G (2013) Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoli CC, Brockmole JR, Witt JK (2012) Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:80–89. doi:10.1037/a0024981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, Castiello U (2003) Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain Cogn 53:495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Ladavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11:1645–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Iriki A, Ladavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guariglia C, Antonucci G (1992) Personal and extrapersonal space: a case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia 30:1001–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350:498–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7:2325–2330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13:522–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marangolo P, Piccardi L, Rinaldi MC (2003) Dissociation between personal and extrapersonal neglect in a crossed aphasia study. Neurocase 9:414–420. doi:10.1076/neur.9.5.414.16554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83:B25–B34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neppi-Mòdona M, Rabuffetti M, Folegatti A et al (2007) Bisecting lines with different tools in right brain damaged patients: the role of action programming and sensory feedback in modulating spatial remapping. Cortex 43:397–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pegna AJ, Petit L, Caldara-Schnetzer AS, Khateb A, Annoni JM, Sztajzel R, Landis T (2001) So near yet so far: neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Ann Neurol 50:820–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peru A, Pinna G (1997) Right personal neglect following a left hemisphere stroke a case report. Cortex 33:585–590. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70240-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:264–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat MJ, Caruana F, Jezzini A et al (2010) Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation. Exp Brain Res 204:605–616

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Serino A, Bassolino M, Farne A, Ladavas E (2007) Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychol Sci 18:642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone SP, Patel P, Greenwood RJ, Halligan PW (1992) Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:431–436. doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.6.431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vallar G (1998) Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 2:87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier P, Valenza N, Mayer E, Reverdin A, Landis T (1998) Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 43:406–410. doi:10.1002/ana.410430324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) Behavioural inattention test. Thames Valley, Bury St. Edmunds

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:880–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zoccolotti P, Antonucci G, Judica A (1992) Psychometric characteristics of two semi-structured scales for the functional evaluation of hemi-inattention in extrapersonal and personal space. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2:179–191. doi:10.1080/09602019208401407

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

MC and EA were supported by a grant from BIAL foundation (grant agreement 41/12 to MC). VG and CS were supported by the EU grant TESIS. CS was also supported by a grant from the Compagnia San Paolo. FF was supported by a grant from the Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. We are grateful to Steve Butterfill for his conceptual and stylistic suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marcello Costantini or Francesca Frassinetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costantini, M., Frassinetti, F., Maini, M. et al. When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect. Exp Brain Res 232, 3233–3241 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4012-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4012-z

Keywords

Navigation