Abstract
The role of active tool use in the remapping of space in hemispatial neglect patients has been extensively investigated. To date, however, there is no evidence that observing tool use can play a role in the remapping of space in hemispatial neglect patients. In this study, a patient with a severe hemispatial neglect in near but not far space and twelve healthy controls were asked to bisect near and far lines using a laser pen. The task was performed both before and immediately after sessions in which they merely observed the experimenter bisecting near and far lines with a stick. During the observation session, participants were either holding an identical stick or empty-handed. Results, in both the neglect patient and healthy controls, showed that observing the experimenter bisecting line while holding the same tool, produces a remapping of the far space into the near space. This result was particularly evident in the neglect patient where observing line-bisection task extended the spatial deficit from the near to the far space. Our results provide new empirical support to the idea that the space around us is not mapped in merely metrical terms, rather it seems to be deeply impacted by both action observation and execution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
CBS = Catherine Bergego Scale; A total score of 0 is considered to indicate no neglect, a score ranging from 1 to 10 indicates mild behavioral neglect, a score of 11–20 indicates moderate neglect and a score of 21–30 indicates severe neglect.
Since confidence intervals rely heavily on the central limit theorem, their estimation may be problematic when the sample data are not normally distributed and/or contain extreme values. This could be problematic in our case, as patients’ behavior tends to be variable, and because there were only eight observations for each condition. Therefore, to assess the accuracy of the reported confidence intervals, we also performed a bootstrap analysis (bias-corrected and accelerated method, 1,000,000 iterations), which provide a robust estimate of the uncertainty associated with parameter estimates (e.g., Carpenter and Bithell 2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19:1141–1164). The so calculated bias-corrected and accelerated 95 % CIs for each condition were very similar to those reported, suggesting that our estimates were not biased, and led to the same conclusions.
References
Ackroyd K, Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Nightingale S, Townsend S (2002) Widening the sphere of influence: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase 8:1–12
Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23:658–664
Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M (2012) Tie my hands, tie my eyes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:263–266. doi:10.1037/a0026570
Bergego C, Azouvi P, Samuel C et al (1995) Validation d’une échelle d’évaluation fonctionnelle de l’héminégligence dans la vie quotidienne: l’échelle CB. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 38:183–189. doi:10.1016/0168-6054(96)89317-2
Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12:415–420
Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A (1986) Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia 24:759–767. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90075-8
Bloesch E, Davoli C, Roth N, Brockmole J, Abrams R (2012) Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance. Psychon Bull Rev 19:177–183. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0200-z
Bueti D, Costantini M, Forster B, Aglioti SM (2004) Uni- and cross-modal temporal modulation of tactile extinction in right brain damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 42:1689–1696
Carpenter J, Bithell J (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19:1141–1164
Castiello U, Lusher D, Mari M, Edwards M, Humphreys G (2002) Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: differential motor priming effects. MIT Press, Cambridge
Costantini M, Bueti D, Pazzaglia M, Aglioti SM (2007) Temporal dynamics of visuo-tactile extinction within and between hemispaces. Neuropsychology 21:242–250
Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C, Gallese V (2011) Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia 49:2658–2663. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.013
Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Sinigaglia C (2012) Does how I look at what you’re doing depend on what I’m doing? Acta Psychol 141:199–204. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.012
Cowey A, Small M, Ellis S (1994) Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32:1059–1066. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90152-x
Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH (2005) Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations. Neuropsychology 19:318–331
Crawford JR, Howell DC (1998) Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. Clin Neuropsychol 12:482–486
Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Porter S (2010) Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cogn Neuropsychol 27:245–260. doi:10.1080/02643294.2010.513967
Cumming G (2013) Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge, London
Davoli CC, Brockmole JR, Witt JK (2012) Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38:80–89. doi:10.1037/a0024981
Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, Castiello U (2003) Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain Cogn 53:495
Farnè A, Ladavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11:1645–1649
Farnè A, Iriki A, Ladavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248
Guariglia C, Antonucci G (1992) Personal and extrapersonal space: a case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia 30:1001–1009
Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350:498–500
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7:2325–2330
Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13:522–525
Marangolo P, Piccardi L, Rinaldi MC (2003) Dissociation between personal and extrapersonal neglect in a crossed aphasia study. Neurocase 9:414–420. doi:10.1076/neur.9.5.414.16554
Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39:580–585
Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83:B25–B34
Neppi-Mòdona M, Rabuffetti M, Folegatti A et al (2007) Bisecting lines with different tools in right brain damaged patients: the role of action programming and sensory feedback in modulating spatial remapping. Cortex 43:397–410
Pegna AJ, Petit L, Caldara-Schnetzer AS, Khateb A, Annoni JM, Sztajzel R, Landis T (2001) So near yet so far: neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Ann Neurol 50:820–822
Peru A, Pinna G (1997) Right personal neglect following a left hemisphere stroke a case report. Cortex 33:585–590. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70240-5
Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:264–274
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661–670
Rochat MJ, Caruana F, Jezzini A et al (2010) Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation. Exp Brain Res 204:605–616
Serino A, Bassolino M, Farne A, Ladavas E (2007) Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychol Sci 18:642–648
Stone SP, Patel P, Greenwood RJ, Halligan PW (1992) Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:431–436. doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.6.431
Vallar G (1998) Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 2:87
Vuilleumier P, Valenza N, Mayer E, Reverdin A, Landis T (1998) Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 43:406–410. doi:10.1002/ana.410430324
Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) Behavioural inattention test. Thames Valley, Bury St. Edmunds
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:880–888
Zoccolotti P, Antonucci G, Judica A (1992) Psychometric characteristics of two semi-structured scales for the functional evaluation of hemi-inattention in extrapersonal and personal space. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2:179–191. doi:10.1080/09602019208401407
Acknowledgments
MC and EA were supported by a grant from BIAL foundation (grant agreement 41/12 to MC). VG and CS were supported by the EU grant TESIS. CS was also supported by a grant from the Compagnia San Paolo. FF was supported by a grant from the Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. We are grateful to Steve Butterfill for his conceptual and stylistic suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costantini, M., Frassinetti, F., Maini, M. et al. When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect. Exp Brain Res 232, 3233–3241 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4012-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4012-z