Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone measures in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents: disparity between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigators have found that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of areal bone mineral density (BMD) values in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents are reduced. Volumetric bone density (BD) measured by quantitative computed tomography (CT) in this population has not been studied. This study was designed to evaluate bone measurements in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents using DXA and CT. Fifty-eight children and adolescents (32 females and 26 males with a mean age ± SD of 12.0±3.9 years, age range 5.0–19.4 years) with perinatally acquired HIV-1 infection underwent simultaneous bone area and density evaluation by DXA and CT. Height and weight measurements as well as pubertal assessment were performed on the same day. All but four subjects were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Subjects were matched with healthy children and adolescents for age, gender, and ethnicity. HIV-1 infected children were significantly shorter ( P <0.001), lighter ( P <0.005), and had delayed puberty ( P <0.001) compared to controls. Using DXA, HIV-1 infected subjects had significantly less bone area ( P <0.001), bone mineral content (BMC) ( P <0.005), and BMD ( P <0.05) at the vertebral level compared to controls. In addition, bone area ( P <0.001), BMC ( P <0.001), and BMD ( P <0.005) of the whole body were also reduced relative to controls. In contrast, using CT, HIV-1 infected subjects had similar vertebral BD compared to controls, but smaller vertebral height and cross-sectional area (CSA) ( P =0.01 and P <0.005, respectively). DXA Z-scores provided values significantly lower than CT Z-scores in the HIV-1 infected population ( P <0.01). After accounting for weight and vertebral height, stepwise multiple regression demonstrated that the prediction of CT BD values of L1 to L3 from DXA values of these vertebrae was significantly improved. HIV-1 infected children and adolescents have lower vertebral and whole body BMC and BMD DXA measures. In contrast, vertebral BD measurements by CT are normal. The lower bone measurements were primarily due to the decreased bone and body size of the HIV-1 subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grinspoon SK, Bilezikian JP (1992) HIV-1 disease and the endocrine system. N Engl J Med. 327:1360–1365

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corcoran C, Grinspoon S (1999) Treatments for wasting in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N England J Med 340:1740–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien KO, Razavi M, Henderson RA, Caballero B, Ellis KJ (2001) Bone mineral content in girls perinatally infected with HIV-1. Am J Clin Nutr 73:821–826

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arpadi SM, Horlick M, Thornton J, Cuff PA, Wang J, Kotler DP (2002) Bone mineral content is lower in prepubertal HIV-infected children. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 29:450–454

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mora S, Sala N, Bricalli D, Zuin G, Chiumello G, Vigano A (2001) Bone mineral loss through increased bone turnover in HIV-1 infected children treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 15:1823–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gafni RI, Baron J (2004) Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). J Pediatr 144:253–257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilsanz V, Nelson DA (2004) Childhood and adolescents. In: Favus MJ (ed) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism, 5th edn. American Society for Bone Mineral Research, Washington, pp 71–80

  8. Tanner JM (1978) Physical growth and development. In: Forfar JO, Arnell CC (eds) Textbook of pediatrics, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 249–303

  9. Mora S, Bachrach L, Gilsanz V (2003) Noninvasive techniques for bone mass measurements. In: Glorieux FH, Pettifor JM, Juppner H (eds) Pediatric bone: biology and diseases. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 303–324

  10. Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M (2000) Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam. Osteoporosis Int 11:158–166

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilsanz V, Kovanlikaya A, Costin G, Roe TF, Sayre J, Kaufman F (1997) Differential effect of gender on the size of the bones in the axial and appendicular skeletons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1603–1607

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF, Carlson M, Senac MO, Boechat MI, Huang HK, Schulz EE, Libanati CR, Cann CC (1988) Vertebral bone density in children: effect of puberty. Radiology 166:847–850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilsanz V, Skaggs DL, Kovanlikaya A, Sayre J, Loro ML, Kaufman F, Korenman SG (1998) Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1420–1427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cann CE (1991) Why, when and how to measure bone mass: a guide for the beginning user. In: Frey GD, Yester MV (eds) Expanding the role of medical physics in nuclear medicine. AIP Publishing, Woodbury, pp 250–279

  15. Kalender WA (1992) Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Osteoporosis Int 2:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prentice A, Parsons TJ, Cole TJ (1994) Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr 60:837–842

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leonard MB, Propert KJ, Zemel BS, Stallings VA, Feldman HI (1999) Discrepancies in pediatric bone mineral density reference data: potential for misdiagnosis of osteopenia. J Pediatr 135:182–188

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bachrach LK (2000) Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements of bone density and body composition: promise and pitfalls. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 13:983–988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilsanz V (1998) Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications. Eur J Radiol 26:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children. J Clin Densitom 7:17–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Theresa Dunaway and Norma Castaneda for their support in subject recruitment and data management. This work was supported by the Campbell Foundation and the National Institutes of Health Grants AR41853, LM06270, and HD13333.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pisit Pitukcheewanont.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the Pediatric Academic Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California, 1–4 May 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitukcheewanont, P., Safani, D., Church, J. et al. Bone measures in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents: disparity between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Osteoporos Int 16, 1393–1396 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1849-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1849-9

Keywords

Navigation