Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reasons for change propagation: a case study in an automotive OEM

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on identifying the reasons for change propagation during the production phase of the product life cycle. Unlike the traditional change propagation study where the focus is within the product, this study is focused to understand the propagation effects of change on other functional silos in the manufacturing firm. First, the reasons for the changes are identified using archival analysis through which it is found that 77.0 % of changes are due to internal reasons while 23.0 % are external. Second, these changes are distinguished into genesis, and propagated changes using a matrix-based modeling approach from which the reasons for propagation are identified. It is inferred that 32.4 % of the total changes are due to propagated changes such as inventory issues, manufacturing issues, and design error rectification. The majority of reasons for these propagated changes include document error rectification such as BOM error, drawing error, incorrect introduction date in engineering change note, and design error rectification such as design limitations. The findings indicate nearly one-third of time spent by the engineers can be reduced by developing appropriate controls during the change release process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Kanike Y (2007) Engineering change during a product’s lifecycle. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design, Paris, France, August 28–31

  • Ameri F, Summers JD, Mocko GM, Porter M (2008) Engineering design complexity: an investigation of methods and measures. Res Eng Des 19(2–3):161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boznak RG, Decker AK (1993) Competitive product development: a quality approach to succeeding in the 1990s and beyond. Business One Irwin/Qualiy Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product development performance: strategy, organisation and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert C (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. J Mech Des 126(5):788–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilovic M, Browning T (2007) Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. Int J Project Manage 25(3):300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhovnik J, Tavcar J (2002) Reengineering with rapid prototyping. Paper presented at the tools and methods of competitive engineering (TMCE), Wuhan, China, April 22–26

  • Eckert C, Zanker W, Clarkson JP (2001) Aspects of a better understanding of changes. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design, ICED’01, Glasgow, UK, August 21–23

  • Eckert CM, Pulm U, Jarratt TA (2003) Mass customisation, change and inspiration: changing designs to meet new needs. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design’03, Stockholm, 19–21 August

  • Eckert C, Clarkson J, Zanker W (2004) Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Res Eng Des 15(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2004) Five misunderstanding about case study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke E, Gebhard B, Negele H, Igenbergs E (2000) Coping with changes: causes, findings, and strategies. Syst Eng 3(4):169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost R (1999) Why does industry ignore design science? J Eng Des 10(4):301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George A, Bennett A (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin ML (2007) Change propagation in large technical systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhalakis G (1986) Engineering changes for made to order products: how an MRP system should handle them. Eng Manag Int 4:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Johnstone G (1995) CMCEA: Change mode, cause and effects analysis: a concurrent engineering approach to cost-effective management of product design changes. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design’95, Praha, Czech Republic, August 22–24

  • Huang GQ, Mak LK (1997) Engineering change management: a survey within UK manufacturing industries. Paper presented at the first international conference: managing enterprises-stakeholders, engineering, logistics, and achievement (ME-SELA), Loughborough University. Loughbourough, July 22–24

  • Huang GQ, Mak LK (1999) Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Yee WY, Mak KL (2001) Development of a web based system for engineering change management. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 17(3):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Yee WY, Mak KL (2003) Current practice of engineering change management in Hong Kong manufacturing industries. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3):481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JG (1994) Achieving successful product change: a handbook (Financial Times/Pitman publishing management series). Trans-Atlantic publications, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarratt T, Clarkson J, Eckert C (2005) Engineering change. In: Design process improvement: a review of current practice. Springer, London Limited, London

  • Jarratt T, Eckert C, Clarkson JP (2006) Pitfalls of engineering change: change practice during complex product design. In: Advances in design, 1st edn. Springer series in Advanced Manufacturing, Germany, pp 413–424

  • Kennedy MM (1979) Generalizing from single case studies. Eval Q 3(4):661–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd MW, Thompson G (2000) Engineering design change management. Integr Manuf Syst 11(1):74–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch CH, Terwiesch C (1999) Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: capacity and congestion effects. J Prod Innov Manage 16(2):145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheison JL, Summers JD (2010) Complexity metrics for directional node link system representations: Theory and applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Quebec, Canada, 2010. ASME

  • Maull R, Hughes D, Bennett J (1992) The role of the bill-of materials as a CAD/CAPM interface and the key importance of engineering change control. Comput Control Eng J 3(2):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morkos B, Summers JD (2010) Requirement change propagation prediction approach: results from an industry case study. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Quebec, Canada, August 15–18

  • Ollinger GA, Stahovich TF (2001) Redesign IT: a constraint based tool for managing design changes. Paper presented at the design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering design, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, September 9–12

  • Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London Limited, London

  • Pikosz P, Malmqvist J (1998) A comparative study of engineering change management in three Swedish engineering companies. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences, Atlanta, GA, USA

  • Roth S (1999) The state of design research, design issues. Design Res 15(2):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouibah K, Kevin CR (2003) Change management in concurrent engineering from parameter perspective. Comput Ind 50(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon D (2006) Design review 2005/2006: the ever increasing maturity of design research papers and case studies. J Eng Des 17(6):481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderberg LG (1989) Facing up to the engineering gap. McKinsey Quarterly Spring 3

  • Stowe D (2008) Investigating the role of prototyping in mechanical design using case study validation. Clemson University, Clemson

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers JD, Shah JJ (2003) Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. Paper presented at the international conference on design theory and methodology, Chicago, IL, USA, September 2–6

  • Teegavarapu S (2009) Foundation of design method development. Dissertation, Clemson University

  • Teegavarapu S, Summers JD, Mocko G (2008) Case study method for design research: justification. Paper presented at the ASME–DETC 2008, New York

  • Terwiesch C, Loch CH (1999) Managing the process of engineering change orders: the case of the climate control system in automobile development. J Product Innov 16(2):160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vianello G, Ahmed S (2008) Engineering changes during the service phase. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, New York, USA, August 3–6

  • Watts F (1984a) Engineering changes: a case study. J Product Invent Manag 25(4):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts F (1984b) Engineering changes: a case study. Product Invent Manag 2(4):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams OJ (1983) Change control in the job shop environment. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference of the American production and inventory control society, Toronto, Canada, pp 496–498

  • Wright IC (1997) A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design. Des Stud 18(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634-0921, USA

    Prabhu Shankar, Beshoy Morkos & Joshua D. Summers

Authors
  1. Prabhu Shankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beshoy Morkos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joshua D. Summers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua D. Summers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shankar, P., Morkos, B. & Summers, J.D. Reasons for change propagation: a case study in an automotive OEM. Res Eng Design 23, 291–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0132-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0132-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation