Skip to main content
Log in

Palliative care in the ICU of 2050: past is prologue

  • What's New in Intensive Care
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. United States President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981) Defining death: a report on the medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C et al (2013) Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the ICU: a report from the improving palliative care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) advisory board. Crit Care Med 41:2318–2327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser JM, Preodor M, Roman E et al (2015) The evolution and dissemination of the education in palliative and end-of-life care program. J Palliat Med 18:765–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR et al (2008) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 36:953–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA et al (2002) A measure of the quality of dying a nd death: initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manag 24:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens RD, Hart N, Herridge MS (2014) Textbook of post-ICU medicine: the legacy of critical care. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H et al (2012) Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med 40:502–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quill TE, Abernethy AP (2013) Generalist plus specialist palliative care: creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med 368:1173–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeCato TW, Engelberg RA, Downey L et al (2013) Hospital variation and temporal trends in palliative and end-of-life care in the ICU. Crit Care Med 41:1405–1411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sprung CL, Truog RD, Curtis JR et al (2014) Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill: the consensus for worldwide end-of-life practice for patients in intensive care units (WELPICUS) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190:855–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Y, Guzauskas GF, Gu C et al (2016) Precision health economics and outcomes research to support precision medicine: big data meets patient heterogeneity on the road to value. J Pers Med 6(4):E20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimbell B, Murray SA, Macpherson S, Boyd K (2016) Embracing inherent uncertainty in advanced illness. BMJ 354:i3802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scheunemann LP, Arnold RM, White DB (2012) The facilitated values history: helping surrogates make authentic decisions for incapacitated patients with advanced illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186:480–486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL et al (2009) Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:853–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kusum S. Mathews.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

KSM receives support from the NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Award: 1K23HL130648-PI: Mathews).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathews, K.S., Nelson, J.E. Palliative care in the ICU of 2050: past is prologue. Intensive Care Med 43, 1850–1852 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4828-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4828-7

Keywords

Navigation