Skip to main content
Log in

Suspected central venous catheter-associated infection: can the catheter be safely retained?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Maki DG, Goldmann DA, Rhame FS (1973) Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med 79:867–887

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maki DG (1981) Nosocomial bacteremia. An epidemiologic overview. Am J Med 70:719–732

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan JA, Abel RM, Abbott WM, Hopkins CC, Chesney TMC, Colley R, Phillips K, Fisher JE (1974) Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition. A prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med 290:757–761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control (2000) Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Activity, Hospital Infection Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases. Monitoring hospital-acquired infections to promote patient safety—United States, 1990–1999. MMWR 49:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brun-Buisson C (2001) New technologies and infection control practices to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1557–1558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crnich CJ, Maki DG (2002) The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices. Clin Infect Dis 34:1232–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mermel LA (2000) Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 132:391–402 (errata in Ann Intern Med 2000, 133:395)

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, Masur H, McCormick RD, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph A et al. (2002) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renaud B, Brun-Buisson C, the ICU-Bacteremia Study Group (2001) Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1584–1590

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, Raad II, O’Grady NP, Harris JS, Craven DE (2001) Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 32:1249–1272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Safdar N, Maki DG (2002) Inflammation at the insertion site is not predictive of catheter-related bloodstream infection with short-term, noncuffed central venous catheters. Crit Care Med 30:2632–2635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook DJ, Randolph AG, Kernerman P, Cupido C, King D, Soukup C, Brun-Buisson C (1997) Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 25:1417–1424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM (1994) Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 331:1735–1738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raad II, Baba M, Bodey GP (1995) Diagnosis of catheter-related infections: the role of surveillance and targeted quantitative skin cultures. Clin Infect Dis 20:593–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG, Miller KB, Newsome HHJ, Sugerman HJ, Dalton HP, Hall GO, Hunsberger S (1990) Clinical predictors of infection of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 11:71–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blot F, Schmidt E, Nitenberg G, Tancrède C, Laplanche A, Andremont A (1998) Earlier positivity of central venous versus peripheral blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 36:105–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, Raynard B, Germann N, Antoun S, Laplanche A, Brun-Buisson C, Tancrède C (1999) Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteremia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of central vs. peripheral blood cultures. Lancet 354:1071–1077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kite P, Dobbins BM, Wilcox MH, McMahon MJ (1999) Rapid diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal. Lancet 354:1504–1507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rijnders BJ, Verwaest C, Peetermans WE, Wilmer A, Vandecasteele S, Van Eldere J, Van Wijngaerden E (2001) Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter- related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 29:1399–1403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rijnders BJ, Peetermans WE, Verwaest C, Wilmer A, Van Wijndgaerdens E (2004) Watchful waiting vs. immediate catheter removal in ICU patients with suspected catheter-related infection: a randomised trial. Intensive Care Med (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2212-x)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Brun-Buisson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brun-Buisson, C. Suspected central venous catheter-associated infection: can the catheter be safely retained?. Intensive Care Med 30, 1005–1007 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2213-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2213-9

Navigation