Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries after iliosacral screw fixation: single versus two screw fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A clinical series of patients was studied to compare the functional score after the use of a single versus two percutaneous iliosacral screws for unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures with or without anterior fixation with the aim to explore if the addition of a second screw would provide better results regarding the functional outcome score.

Materials and methods

This case series includes 77 patients with an average of 32.6 years who suffered unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures. Forty-six were Tile type C and 31 were Tile type B. Patients underwent closed reduction and were fixed using percutaneous fluoroscopic-guided iliosacral screws in the supine position with 1 screw in 50 fractures, 2 screws in 37 fractures, 2 fractures were fixed with plates after ORIF, and in 6 cases (out of the bilateral cases) the undisplaced side was unfixed. Postoperatively three patients were lost to follow up and 74 patients (84 posterior fractures fixed with screws) were followed up for a mean of 37.4 months (range 6–151 months) and were evaluated using the Majeed score (1989).

Results

Clinical union occurred in all the patients, although in two cases posterior fixation failed and was revised. Radiologically excellent reduction was achieved in 55 patients (71.4 %), good in 16 (20.8 %), fair in 6 (7.8 %) and none had poor reduction. Statistically; among 62 cases that completed the Majeed score evaluation at the last follow-up session, there was no significant difference p value 0.051 between two groups. We also compared Majeed score in Tile B and C fractures fixed with one versus two screws.

Conclusion

The addition of a second screw for posterior fixation did not show any statistically significant difference regarding functional outcome.

Level of evidence

Level IV clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moed BR, Geer BL. S2 iliosacral screw fixation for disruptions of the posterior pelvic ring: a report of 49 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:378–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moed BR, Kellam JF, McLaren A, Tile M. Internal fixation for the injured pelvic ring. In: Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF, editors. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 217–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Routt C Jr, Simonian P, Mills W. Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(8):584–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Routt ML Jr, Nork SE, Mills WJ. Percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:15–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Bosch EW, Van Zwienen CM, Van Vugt AB. Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma. 2002;53:44–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis CC, Pape HC, Robert CS. Percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring: an update. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B(2):145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sagi HC, Ordway NR, Di Pasquale T. Biomechanical analysis of fixation for vertically unstable sacroiliac dislocations with iliosacral screws and symphyseal plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:138–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yinger K, Scalise J, Olson SA, Bay BK, Finkemeier CG. Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(7):481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simonian PT, Routt MLC Jr, Harrington RM, et al. Internal fixation for the transforaminal sacral fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:202–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Comstock CP, Van der Muelen MCH, Goodman SB. Biomechanical comparison of posterior internal fixation techniques for unstable pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71-B:304–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matta JM, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin. Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:129–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. Trauma. 2007;63(4):884–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mullis B, Sagi C. Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome? J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(5):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mears SC, Sutter EG, Wall SJ, Rose DM, Belkoff SM. Biomechanical comparison of three methods of sacral fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Spine. 2010;35(10):392–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Zwienen CM, van den Bosch EW, Snijders CJ, Kleinrensink GJ, Van Vugt AB. Biomechanical comparison of sacroiliac screw techniques for unstable pelvic ring fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(9):589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tornetta P, Matta JM. Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matta J, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;242:83–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin DR, Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL, Whitlock S. Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure? J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(1):S30–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gänsslen A, Tscherne H. The hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;305:69–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tornetta P, Dickson K, Matta JM. Outcome of rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries treated operatively. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:147–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gruen GS, Leit ME, Gruen RJ, Garrison HG, Auble TE, Peitzman AB. Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures stabilized with open reduction and internal fixation. J Trauma. 1995;39:838–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Den Bosch EW, Van Der Kleyn R, Hogervorst M, Van Vugt AB. Functional outcome of internal fixation for pelvic ring fractures. J Trauma. 1999;47:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cole JD, Blum DA, Ansel LJ. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:160–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr Sherif Khaled, Omar Soliman and Mohamed Abdel Wahed declare that there are no conflicts of interest and we all hereby declare that we did not receive grants or financial support from any company or individuals.

Ethical standards

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the orthopedic department, Cairo University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Khaled.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaled, S.A., Soliman, O. & Wahed, M.A. Functional outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries after iliosacral screw fixation: single versus two screw fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 387–392 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0456-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0456-x

Keywords

Navigation