Skip to main content
Log in

Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris: interpretation using a simulation model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insect societies generally manifest reproductive division of labor with one or a few fecund females (queens) and sterile helpers (workers). This is generally mediated by behavioural hierarchy that reduces the cost of within-group aggression. Aggressive behaviour and ovarian development are thus two co-occurring correlates of reproductive skew, but their mutual influence remains unclear. Here we examined the interplay between these factors by constructing a simulation model, based on the biology of Bombus terrestris, to test whether aggression levels are determined by the level of ovarian development or vice versa. We approached this question using virtual groups composed of either equally or unequally matched workers, as well as supplementing the simulation data by experimental data using actual bee groups. The simulation revealed that previous encounter experience (win/lose) rather than mutual assessment of reproductive status determines and maintains hierarchy in B. terrestris. Furthermore, although bumblebee workers largely vary in their aggression tendencies, pre-existing differences between nest-mates were not obligatory for establishment of the hierarchy. The initially formed linear hierarchy became polynomial after 10 days, clearly separating between egg-laying workers and helpers. This was consistent with the results obtained for actual bee groups. We propose that aggressive behaviour and the outcome of previous encounters are major determinants of ovarian development and not vice versa. Workers may gain a head start in the competition due to variation in their innate aggressive tendencies, or by fortuitously winning their first encounters. Small differences in aggressiveness between workers are amplified to initially form a short-term linear hierarchy that subsequently turns to polynomial hierarchy, creating the most basic phenomenon of social groups, reproductive division of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaux C., Boutot M., Jaisson P. and Hefetz A. 2007. Reproductive plasticity in bumblebee workers (Bombus terrestris) - reversion from fertility to sterility under queen influence. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 213-222

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaux C., Savarit F., Jaisson P. and Hefetz A. 2004. Does the queen win it all? Queen-worker conflict over male production in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Naturwissenschaften 91: 400-403

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsalem E. and Hefetz A. 2010. The appeasement effect of sterility signaling in dominance contests among Bombus terrestris workers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 1685-1694

  • Amsalem E. and Hefetz A. 2011. The effect of group size on the interplay between dominance and reproduction in Bombus terrestris. Plos One 6: e18238

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsalem E., Twele R., Francke W. and Hefetz A. 2009. Reproductive competition in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris: do workers advertise sterility? Proc. R. Soc. London B 276: 1295-1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch G., Borst D.W., Huang Z.Y., Robinson G.E., Cnaani J. and Hefetz A. 2000a. Juvenile hormone titers, juvenile hormone biosynthesis, ovarian development and social environment in Bombus terrestris. J. Insect Physiol. 46: 47-57

  • Bloch G., Simon T., Robinson G.E. and Hefetz A. 2000b. Brain biogenic amines and reproductive dominance in bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). J. Comp. Physiol. A 186: 261-268

  • Bonabeau E., Theraulaz G. and Deneubourg J.L. 1996. Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies. Bull. Math. Biol. 58: 661-717

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E., Theraulaz G. and Deneubourg J.L. 1999. Dominance orders in animal societies: The self-organization hypothesis revisited. Bull. Math. Biol. 61: 727-757

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase I.D. 1980. Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45(6): 905-924

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase I.D. 1982a. Behavioral sequences during dominance hierarchy formation in chickens. Science 216: 439-440

  • Chase I.D. 1982b. Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour 80: 218-240

  • Chase I.D. 1986. Explanations of hierarchy structure. Anim. Behav. 34: 1265-1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase I.D., Bartolomeo C. and Dugatkin L.A. 1994. Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: How long do winners keep winning? Anim. Behav. 48: 393-400

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase I.D., Tovey C. and Murch P. 2003. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: Differences in dominance relationships in isolated versus socially embedded pairs of fish. Behaviour 140: 1193-1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnaani J., Borst D.W., Huang Z.Y., Robinson G.E. and Hefetz A. 1997. Caste determination in Bombus terrestris: Differences in development and rates of JH biosynthesis between queen and worker larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 43: 373-381

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuvillier-Hot V., Lenoir A. and Peeters C. 2004. Reproductive monopoly enforced by sterile police workers in a queenless ant. Behav. Ecol. 15: 970-975

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau M.J. and Velthuis H.H.W. 1988. Development and reproductive strategies in Bombus terrestris colonies. Behaviour 107: 186-207

  • Duchateau M.J. and Velthuis H.H.W. 1989. Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 51: 199-213

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. 1997. Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav. Ecol. 8: 583-587

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Druen M. 2004. The social implications of winner and loser effects. Proc. R. Soc. London B 271: S488-S489

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Earley R.L. 2003. Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups. Behav. Ecol. 14: 367-373

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Earley R.L. 2004. Individual recognition, dominance hierarchie and winner and loser effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 1537-1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva S., Hartfelder K. and Bloch G. 2005. Reproductive division of labor, dominance, and ecdysteroid levels in hemolymph and ovary of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. J. Insect Physiol. 51: 811-823

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. 1972. Altruism and related phenomena mainly in the social insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 193-232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogeweg P. and Hesper B. 1983. The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: A mirror model. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 271-283

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau H.G. 1951a. On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies. I. Effects of inherent characteristics. Bull. Math. Biophysics 13: 1-19

  • Landau H.G. 1951b. On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies. II. Some effects of possible social causes. Bull. Math. Biophysics 13: 245-262

  • Larrere M. and Couillaud F. 1993. Role of juvenile hormone biosynthesis in dominance status and reproduction of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 335-338

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte Y., Arnold G., Trouiller J. and Masson C. 1990. Identification of a brood pheromone in honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 77: 334-336

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommelen E., Wenseleers T., Johnson C., Drijfhout F.P., Billen J. and Gobin B. 2010. A combination of fertility signals and aggression regulates reproduction in the ant Gnamptogenys striatula. J. Insect Behav. 23: 236-249

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts.: Harvard University Press.

  • Roeseler P.F., Roeseler I., Strambi A. and Augier R. 1984. Influence of insect hormones on the establishment of dominance hierarchies among foundresses of the paper wasp, Polistes gallicus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 133-142

    Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn A. 1987. Investigations into the regulation of dominance behaviour and of the division of labour in bumblebee colonies (Bombus terrestris). Neth. J. Zool. 37: 255-276

    Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn A. 1989. Factors influencing dominance behavior in queenless bumblebee workers Bombus terrestris. Physiol. Entomol. 14: 211-222

    Google Scholar 

  • van Honk C.G.J. and Hogeweg P. 1981. The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 111-119

  • van Honk C.G.J., Velthuis H.H.W., Röseler P.F. and Malotaux M.E. 1980. The mandibular glands of Bombus terrestris queens as a source of queen pheromone. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 28: 191-198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from The Israel Science Foundation founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences (ISF grant no. 535/08). We thank Naomi Paz for editorial assistance and several reviewers who provided valuable comments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Amsalem.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 440 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amsalem, E., Shamia, D. & Hefetz, A. Aggression or ovarian development as determinants of reproductive dominance in Bombus terrestris: interpretation using a simulation model. Insect. Soc. 60, 213–222 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0285-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0285-7

Keywords

Navigation