Prevalence and clinical significance of misinterpretations of plain radiographs by orthopedic residents in a minor trauma emergency room

Abstract

Purpose: (1) To determine the accuracy of interpretation of plain radiographs by orthopedic residents in a minor trauma emergency room, (2) to evaluate the clinical significance of misinterpretations for patient management, and (3) to evaluate the necessity of routine plain film review by a radiologist and an efficient patient recall system. Materials and methods: Our retrospective study evaluated discrepancies in plain film reading between orthopedic residents and radiologists. A total of 2283 radiographic examinations were evaluated for discrepancies. The medical records and X-rays in misinterpreted cases were assessed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and a staff orthopedist. The misinterpretations were categorized based on their clinical significance and influence on medical care. Misinterpretations which required immediate change in treatment or mandated further work-up were considered to have high clinical significance. Results: Forty-six (2 %) of the 2283 interpretations were defined as misinterpretations. Of the 46 cases, 27 (59 %) were missed fractures, 5 (11 %) were missed tumors, and 7 (15 %) were false positive readings of normal films. Twenty-one (46 %) of the misinterpretations had significant consequences. Forty-one percent of missed fractures had a high clinical significance, whereas only 14 % of false positive readings had a high clinical significance. Conclusion: The accuracy of plain film interpretation by orthopedic residents in the minor trauma setting is high (98 %). Nevertheless, 46 % of the misinterpretations have significant clinical consequences. This indicates that all emergency trauma films should be reviewed by an experienced radiologist, and an expedient method of informing the orthopedic department of any discrepancies in reading is recommended.