Skip to main content
Log in

Temperament Differences Among Children with Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder

  • General Article
  • Published:
The California School Psychologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temperament-based learning style preferences of 80 children, ages 8 to 17, 40 with conduct disorder (CD) and 40 with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) were examined using the Student Styles Questionnaire (SSQ). The SSQ measures four dimensions of learning style preferences based on temperament theory (Extroverted-Introverted, Thinking-Feeling, Practical-Imaginative, and Organized-Flexible). Their T-scores were compared for strength of preference between the two disorders. In addition, analysis for frequency of preference among children with CD and ODD was compared to the frequency of preference typically found in the general population. When comparing the strength of temperament preferences of children with CD and ODD significant differences were noted only for Practical-Imaginative styles. Children with ODD displayed a stronger preference for acquiring and assessing new information in Practical styles than did children with CD. Students with CD or ODD did not differ significantly for strength of preference on Extroverted-Introverted, Thinking-Feeling, and Organized-Flexible styles. When comparing the frequency of temperament preferences of children with CD and ODD to preference rates found in the general population, significant differences were noted only for children with ODD. They more often indicated a preference for Practical and Thinking styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., rev.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atman, K. S. (1993). Goal accomplishment style and psychological type: Cultural variations. Psychological Type and Culture-East and West: Multicultural Research Symposium, 207–220.

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997). Defiant children: A clinician’s manual for parent training. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. (1989). Impact of teacher personality on classroom environment. Journal of Psychological Type, 18, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. E., Wachs, T. D., & Emde, R. N. (1994). Toward practical uses of biological concepts of temperament. In J. E. Bates & Y. D. Wachs (Eds.), Temperament: Individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 275–306). Washington, D.C.: American Psychology Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beyler, J., & Schmeck, R. R. (1992). Assessment of individual differences in preferences for holistic-analytic strategies: Evaluation of some commonly available instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 709–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornett, C. E. (1983). What you should know about teaching and learning styles. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTiberio, J. K. (1977). The strength of sensing-intuition preference on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as related to empathic discrimination of overt or covert feeling messages of others. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5599A. (UMI No. 77–5789).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Newman, J. P. (1981). Biased decision-making processes in aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 275–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J. (1998). Conduct disorders and severe antisocial behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galen. (1992). The art of cure-Extracts from Galen: Mailmoides’ medical writings. (U.S. Barzel, Trans.). Haifa, Israel: Maimonides Research Institute. (Original work published date unknown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. F., & Lawrence, G. (1985). Psychological type and time orientation: Do middle school students differ in projecting their personal futures? Journal of Psychological Type, 9, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippocrates. (1939). Hippocrates, 1. (W. H. S. Jones, Trans). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published date unknown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Zimmerman, A., & Brooker, N. (1994). Implications and applications of type theory on a two-year technical college campus. Proceedings: Orchestrating Educational Change in the 90’s — The Role of Psychological Type, 221–234.

  • Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. (R. F. C. Hull, Revision of Trans. by H. G. Baynes). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (1991). Infant predictors of inhibited and uninhibited profiles. Psychological Science, 2(1), 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Mashlach Burnout Inventory Manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (1985). Hemisphere specialization and Jungian typology-evidence for a relationship. Bulletin of Psychological Type, 10(2), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. E. (1979). Personality types of therapist and client and their use in counseling. Research in Psychological Type, 2, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T., Glutting, J. J., & Horton, C. B. (1996). Student Styles Questionnaire: Star qualities in learning, relating, and working. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T., Joyce, D., Glutting, J., & Horton, C. (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of male and female students identified as gifted and students not identified as gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., Leiman, A. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (1996). Biological psychology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurr, K. T., Ruble, V. E., Palomba, C., Pickerill, B., & Moore, D. (1997). Relationships between MBTI and selected aspects of Tinto’s model for college attrition. Journal of Psychological Type, 40, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J. (1996). Health, stress, and coping. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 197–215). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M., & Oakland, T. (1996). Validity of temperament constructs using the Student Styles Questionnaire: Comparisons for three racial-ethnic groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, G. (1990). Brain and personality: Extraversion/introversion in relation to EEG, evoked potentials and cerebral blood flow. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1989). Temperament and personality. In G. A. Kohnstamm, J. E. Bates, & M. K. Rothbart (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 249–261). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, A. (1987). The press of personality: A study of conversations between Introverts and Extroverts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 718–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Jessup, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollbrecht, F. E. (1991). A study of selected personality characteristics of vocational trade and industrial education teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 06–A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. A., & Languis, M. L. (1990). A topographic study of difference in the P300 between introverts and extraverts. Brain Topography, 2(4), 369–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Joyce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joyce, D., Oakland, T. Temperament Differences Among Children with Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Contemp School Psychol 10, 125–136 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340927

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340927

Key Words

Navigation