Abstract
We herein report a case of malignant lymphoma that showed differential FDG accumulation associated with the degree of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression. For clinical staging purpose, FDG-PET was performed on a 47-year-old male who had been diagnosed to have malignant lymphoma, diffuse medium B-cell type. Although an X-ray CT showed multiple and bulky lymphadenopathy including bilateral submandibular, deep cervical, supraclavicular, axillar, hilar, mesenteric and paraaortic regions, FDG-PET showed a high accumulation only in the bilateral submandibular and deep cervical region. An immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated a high GLUT-1 expression in the right cervical lymph, node, which showed a high FDG uptake. On the other hand, a bone marrow specimen with diffuse lymphoma cell involvement indicated showed no FDG accumulation and also revealed a negative GLUT-1 expression. This case suggests that the differential FDG accumulation shown by lesions is associated with the degree of GLUT-1 expression in patients with lymphoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Paul R. Comparison of fluorine-18-2-fluorodeoxyglucose and gallium-67 citrate imaging for detection of lymphoma.J Nucl Med 1987; 28: 288–292.
Okada J, Yoshikawa K, Imazeki K, Minoshima S, Uno K, Itami J, et al. The use of FDG-PET in the detection and management of malignant lymphoma: correlation of uptake with prognosis.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 686–691.
Newman JS, Francis IR, Kaminski MS, Wahl RL. Imaging of lymphoma with PET with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose: correlation with CT.Radiology 1994; 190: 111–116.
Buchmann I, Reinhardt M, Elsner K, Bunjes D, Altehoefer C, Finke J, et al. 2-(fluorine-18) fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma.Cancer 2001; 91: 889–899.
Hoh CK, Glaspy J, Rosen P, Dahlbom M, Lee SJ, Kunkel L, et al. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.J Nucl Med 1997; 38: 343–348.
Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CGA, Guhlmann A, Kotzerke J, Merkle E, et al. Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[18-F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging.Radiology 1997; 203: 795–800.
Stumpe KDM, Urbinelli M, Steinert HC, Glanzmann HC, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of lymphoma: effectiveness and comparison with computed tomography.Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 721–728.
Bangerter M, Moog F, Buchmann I, Kotzerke J, Griesshammer M, Hafner M, et al. Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin's disease.Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 1117–1122.
Jerusalem G, Warland V, Najjar F, Paulus P, Fassotte MF, Fillet G, et al. Whole-body18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Nucl Med Commun 1999; 20: 13–20.
Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Najjar F, Hustinx R, Fassotte MF, Rigo P, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) with18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) for the staging of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 825–830.
Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Koga H, Nakagawa M, Chen T, Kaneko K, et al. Clinical impact of whole body FDG-PET on the staging and therapeutic decision making for malignant lymphoma.Ann Nucl Med 2002; 16: 337–345.
Shah N, Hoskin P, McMillan A, Gibson P, Lowe J, Wong WL. The impact of FDG positron emission tomography imaging on the management of lymphomas.Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 482–487.
Schöder H, Meta J, Yap C, Ariannejad M, Rao J, Phelps ME, et al. Effect of whole-body18F-FDG PET imaging on clinical staging and management of patients with malignant lymphoma.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1139–1143.
Römer W, Hanauske AR, Ziegler S, Thödtmann R, Weber W, Fuchs C, et al. Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose.Blood 1998; 91: 4464–4471.
Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O'Doherty MJ, Hain S, Maisery MN.18FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma—comparison with CT.Leukemia and Lymphoma 2000; 39: 5–6.
Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Van Steenweghen S, Thomas J, Vandenberghe P, et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F] FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F] FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods?J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 414–419.
Okada J, Yoshikawa K, Itami M, Imaseki K, Uno K, Itami J, et al. Positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in malignant lymphoma: a comparison with proliferative activity.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 325–329.
Rodriguez M, Rehn S, Ahlstrom H, Sundstrom C, Glimelius B. Predicting malignancy grade with PET in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1790–1796.
Lapela M, Leskinen S, Minn HR, Lindholm P, Klemi PJ, Söderström KO, et al. Increased glucose metabolism in untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a study with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose.Blood 1995; 86: 3522–3527.
Hoffmann M, Kletter K, Diemling M, Becherer A, Pfeffel F, Petkov V, et al. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) does not visualize extranodal B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type.Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 1185–1189.
Brown RS, Leung JY, Kison PV, Zasadny KR, Flint A, Wahl RL. Glucose transporters and FDG uptake in untreated primary human non-small cell lung cancer.J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 556–565.
Smith DAT. The rate-limiting step for tumor [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) incorporation.Nucl Med Biol 2001; 28: 1–4.
Waki A, Kato H, Yano R, Sadato N, Yokoyama A, Ishii Y, et al. The importance of glucose transport activity as the rate-limiting step of 2-deoxyglucose uptake in tumor cellsin vitro.Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25: 593–597.
Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, Magata Y, Sasayama S, Yonekura Y, et al.In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1811–1817.
Warburg OH.The metabolism of tumors. London; Constable, 1930: 29–169.
Shinohara Y. Identification and characterization of hexokinase isoform predominantly expressed in malignant tumor cells.Yakugaku Zasshi 2000; 130: 657–666. [Japanese]
Katabi MM, Chan HL, Karp SE, Batist G. Hexokinase type II: a novel tumor-specific promoter for gene-targeted therapy differentially expressed and regulated in human cancer cells.Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 155–164.
Brown RS, Goodman TM, Zasadny KR, Greenson JK, Wahl RL. Expression of hexokinase II and Glut-1 in untreated human breast cancer.Nucl Med Biol 2002; 29: 443–453.
Higashi T, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, Mamede MH, Wada M, et al. Relationship between retention index in dual-phase18F-FDG PET, and hexokinase-II and glucose transporter-1 expression in pancreatic cancer.J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 173–180.
Nelson CA, Wang JQ, Leav I, Crane PD. The interaction among glucose transport, hexokinase, and glucose-6-phosphatase with respect to3H-2-deoxyglucose retention in murine tumor models.Nucl Med Biol 1996; 23: 533–541.
Tatsumi M, Kitayama H, Sugahara H, Tokita N, Nakamura H, Kanakura Y, et al. Whole-body hybrid PET with18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 601–608.
Mochizuki T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, Kanegae K, Zhao S, Hikosaka K, et al. FDG uptake and glucose transporter subtype expressions in experimental tumor and inflammation models.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1551–1555.
Mueckler M. Facilitative glucose transporters.Eur J Biochem 1994; 219: 713–725.
Adams V, Kempf W, Hassam S, Briner J. Determination of hexokinase isozyme I and II by RT-PCR: increased hexokinase II isozyme in human renal cell carcinoma.J Biochem Mol Med 1995; 54: 53–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koga, H., Matsuo, Y., Sasaki, M. et al. Differential FDG accumulation associated with GLUT-1 expression in a patient with lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med 17, 327–331 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988530
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988530