Skip to main content
Log in

Energetics of foraging inMacaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus and a selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small animals differ from large animals in their relative and absolute metabolic requirements and energetic expenditures. A preliminary study of the behavioral effects of these size dependent variables were investigated in two arboreal, sympatric and frugivorous anthropoid species:Macaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus. Data on both species were collected in East Kalimantan, Indonesia during a 20-month field study which focused onM. fascicularis. There are marked size dependent behavioral differences between the two species which show the constraints of large body size.

Existing hypotheses of the selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan have either overlooked its advantages by describing it as a remnant of Pleistocene terrestriality and predator defense or attributed its advantage to greater access to resources. Contrasts between the energetics of foraging in the monkey and the ape suggest an alternate hypothesis for selection of large body size relating to the increased capacity of large body size to store fat energy and to subsist on lower quality foods in a relatively marked spatial-temporal unpredictable microhabitat of fruiting and flowering trees. Body size and energetics may play an important role in our models of the evolution of behavior and in the evolution of the great apes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, R. H. V., 1971. A grazing ecosystem in the Serengetti.Sci. Amer., 225: 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, G. A. &D. A. York, 1979. Hypothalamic and genetic obesity in experimental animals: an autonomic and endocrine hypothesis.Physiol. Rev., 59(3): 719–809.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, G. F., Jr., 1970. Starvation in man.New Eng. J. Med., 282: 668–675.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calow, P., 1979. The cost of reproduction—a physiological approach.Biol. Rev., 54: 23–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., &P. H. Harvey, 1977a. Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 557–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, & ————, 1977b. Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool., London, 183: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, A. M., Jr., L. S. Coelho, C. A. Bramblett, S. S. Bramblett &L. B. Quick, 1976. Ecology, population characteristics and sympatric association in primates: a socio-bioenergetic analysis of howler and spider monkeys in Tikal, Guatemala.Yb. Phys. Anthropol., 20: 96–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————,C. A. Bramblett &L. B. Quick, 1979. Activity patterns in howler and spider monkeys: an application of socio-bioenergetic methods. In:Primate Ecology and Human Origins,I. S. Bernstein &E. O. Smith (eds.), Garland STPM Press, New York, pp. 175–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K., 1974. Predictability, constancy and contingency of periodic phenomena.Ecology, 55: 1148–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E. D., 1986.The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution. Open Court Pub. Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, C. M. &W. L. Wilson, 1980. The ecological separation ofMacaca nemestrina andM. fascicularis in Sumatra. In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., Princeton, pp. 148–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direktorat Perencanaan, 1973.Survey Kelompok Hutan, Muara Badak-Sungei Santan Departemen Pertanian. Laporan No. 352.

  • Dobzhansky, T., F. J. Ayala, G. L. Stebbins &J. W. Valentine, 1977.Evolution. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Franciso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdz, & A. Osiecki, 1973. Intake and digestibility of natural foods by roedeer.Acta Theriol., 18(3): 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, R. B., 1975. The relative body weights of Bornean and Sumatran orangutans.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 42: 349–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fedak, M. A. &H. J. Seeherman, 1979. Reappraisal of energetics of locomotion shows identical cost in bipeds and quadrupeds including ostrich and horse.Nature, 282: 713–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fooden, J., 1971.Report on Primates Collected in Western Thailand. Fieldiana Zoology,Vol. 59, No. 1. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1976. Primates obtained in peninsular Thailand June–July 1973, with notes on the distribution of continental southeast Asian leaf-monkeys (Presbytis)Primates, 17: 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F., 1978. Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve, central Borneo. Unpub. doctoral dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1979. Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: mating and ecology. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds.), Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., Menlo Park, pp. 194–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C. &M. Konner, 1977. On the natural diet of primates including humans. In:Nutrition and the Brain, Vol. 1,R. J. Wurtman &J. J. Wurtman (eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &J. A. Kurland, 1976. Primate predation and bioenergetics.Science, 191: 314–315.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, V., 1977. A comparison of social adaptations in relation to ecology in gallinaceous bird and ungulate societies.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 8: 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. D., 1976.Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, T. I., 1976. Differences in terrestrial velocity inMacaca andPresbytis.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 45: 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1977a. Body weight: its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution and motor function. I. Interspecific comparisons.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 47: 211–239.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1977b. Body weight: its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution and motor function. II. Development ofMacaca mulatta.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 47: 241–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1978. Adaptations of tissue and limb segments to facilitate moving and feeding in arboreal folivores. In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. J., III, &C. D. Busse, 1978. Primate carnivory and its significance to human diets.BioScience, 28(2): 761–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. E., 1966.Biological Energy Interrelationships and Glossary of Energy Terms. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., Publication 1411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L., 1973.Statistics for the Social Sciences. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooijer, D. A., 1948. Prehistoric teeth of man and of the orang-utan from central Sumatra, with notes on the fossil orang-utan from Java and southern China.Zoologische Mededeelingen XXIX. E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 175–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1949. Mammalian evolution in the Quaternary of southern and eastern Asia.Evolution, 3: 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L., 1975. Incisor size and diet in Anthropoids with special reference to Cercopithecidae.Science, 189: 1095–1098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H., 1974. Tropical blackwater rivers, animals and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae.Biotropica, 6(2): 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., 1975. The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 43: 195–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M., 1961.The Fire of Life, an Introduction to Animal Energetics. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloss, B. C., 1908. The white-handed gibbon.R. A. Soc. J. Straits Branch, 50: 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, J. A., 1973. A natural history of the kra macaques (Macaca fascicularis Raffles, 1821) at the Kutai Nature Reserve, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia.Primates, 14: 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, E. G. Jr., &N. Smythe, 1978. Leaf production, leaf consumption and the regulation of folivory on Barro Colorado Island. In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytle, L. D., 1977. Control of eating behavior. In:Nutrition and the Brain, Vol. 2,J. J. Wurtman &R. J. Wurtman (eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J., 1971. The orang-utan in Sabah today.Oryx, 11(2–3): 141–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1974. The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus).Anim. Behav., 22: 3–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1977. A comparative ecology of Asian apes.Primates, 18: 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, &K. S. MacKinnon, 1978. Comparative feeding ecology of six sympatric primates in west Malaysia. In:Recent Advances in Primatology,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoro, E. J., 1977. Lipids and lipid metabolism.Ann. Rev. Physiol., 39: 301–321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K., 1978. Behavioral adaptations to leaf-eating by the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata). In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1979. Factors influencing leaf choice by howler monkeys: a test of some hypotheses of food selection by generalist herbivores.Amer. Naturalist, 114: 362–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, A. N., 1973.Wildlife Ecology. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A., 1966. Obesity and the evolution of man.J. Amer. Med. Ass., 195(2): 105–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, 1972. Nutrient requirements of the monkey. In:Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals, Publication No. 10, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C., pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsholme, E. A. &C. Start, 1973.Regulation in Metabolism. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R., 1976. Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics.Amer. Zool., 16: 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond, C. M., 1978. Morphological aspects and the ecological and mechanical consequences of fat deposition in wild vertebrates.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 9: 519–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch, B., 1960.Evolution above the Species Level. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. W., 1966.The Tropical Rain Forest. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen H. D., 1978.A Fieldstudy on Sumatran Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abeliiLesson 1827). H. Veenman & Zonen B. V., Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S., 1977. Feeding behavior of orang-utans of the Kutai Nature Reserve, East Kalimantan. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 383–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1978. Diets, densities and distributions of Bornean primates. In:Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1979. Individual activity patterns and the solitary nature of orang-utans. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds.), Benjamin-Cummings Pub. Co., Menlo Park, pp. 234–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1981. Nutrition of wild and captive orang-utans. In:Handbook of Nutrition,M. Rechcigl (ed.), Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 1972,How Animals Work. Cambrigde Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H., 1968. The recent hominoid primates. In:Perspectives on Human Evolution I,S. L. Washburn &P. C. Jay (eds.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 122–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1953.The Major Features of Evolution. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. &D. R. Pilbeam, 1980. Evolution of the orang-utan.Nature, 284: 447–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C. H. &F. C. Cadigan, Jr., 1972. Population studies of Malaysian primates.Primates, 13: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., 1973. An explanation forCope's rule.Evolution, 27(1): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, R. L., 1974. Facultative terrestrial hand postures in an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and pongid evolution.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 40: 27–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. R., S. L. Caldwell &V. J. Rowntree, 1972. Running up and down hills: some consequences of size.Science, 178: 1096–1098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, R. H. &J. V. Basmajian, 1974. Electromyography of forearm musculature in gorilla and problems related to knuckle-walking. In:Primate Locomotion,F. A. Jenkins,Jr. (ed), Academic Press, New York, pp. 293–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walike, B. C., C. J. Goodner, D. J. Koerker, E. W. Chideckel &L. W. Kalnasy, 1977. Assessment of obesity in pig-tailed monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).J. Med. Primatol., 6: 151–162.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug, R. J., H. Yang, J. J. Sepkoski, Jr. &D. M. Raup, 1979. The evolution of body size on islands: a computer simulation.Amer. Naturalist, 114(2): 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. S., 1964. Nutritional ecology. In:Human Biology,G. A. Harrison,J. S. Weiner,J. M. Tanner &N. A. Barnicot (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 400–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, B. P., 1979. Riverine secondary forest in the Kutai Nature Reserve, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.Malayan Nat. J., 32(1): 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1980. Feeding and ranging of east BorneanMacaca fascicularis. In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., Princeton, pp. 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C., 1975.Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. H., 1976.Nutritional Aspects of Human Physical and Athletic Performance. C. C. Thomas, Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. H. S., 1956. The dipterocarp flowering season in north Borneo, 1955.Malayan For., 19: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A., 1976. Fat, energy and mammalian survival.Amer. Zool., 16:699–710.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Wheatley, B.P. Energetics of foraging inMacaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus and a selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan. Primates 23, 348–363 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381319

Keywords

Navigation