Skip to main content
Log in

NewProconsul (Xenopithecus) from the Miocene of Kenya

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A maxillary fragment with M2–3 from the middle Miocene of Lothidok Hill, northwestern Kenya represents a new species ofProconsul—the typical East African early and middle Miocene hominoid species group. M2 inProconsul (Xenopithecus)hamiltoni sp. nov. is about 50% larger than in Kenyan lower MioceneP. (X.)koruensis. Xenopithecus is revived as a subgenus ofProconsul because its species are less derived than typical species of that genus in having small—unexpanded—trigons, in possessing an M2 with a significantly lower relative length, and in lacking a hypocone and large metacone on M3; however, xenopithecines share with proconsulines welldefined trigon ridges on M1–3, large hypocones on M1–2, greater relative height of M2–3, and crenulated cingula on M1–3 four character complexes derived over those of plesiomorphous East African early and middle MioceneLimnopithecus.

An upper canine from Lothidok Hill represents a second species ofProconsul, P. (Proconsul)major. This identification confirms earlier records of that species from Lothidok.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allbrook, D. &W. W. Bishop, 1963. New fossil hominoid from Uganda.Nature, 197: 1187–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., 1971. Two new fossil primates from the Lower Miocene of Kenya.Nature, 228: 537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. J., 1978. A revision of the Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa.Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)Bull., A30: 85–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &J. A. H. Van Couvering, 1975. Palaeoenvironments in the East African Miocene. In:Approaches to Primate Biology, Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 5,F. Szalay (ed.), S. Karger, Basel, pp. 62–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. H., L. A. Williams, J. A. Miller, &F. J. Fitch, 1971. Sequence and geochronology of the Kenya Rift Volcanics.Tectonophysics, 11: 191–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, W. A. &J. A. Van Couvering, 1974. The Late Neogene biostratigraphy, geochronology and paleoclimatology of the last 15 million years in marine and continental sequences.Palaeogeog., Palaeocolim., Palaeoecol., 16: 1–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, W. W., 1963. The later Tertiary and Pleistocene in eastern equatorial Africa. In:African Ecology and Human Evolution,F. C. Howell &F. Bourliere (eds.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 247–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, G., 1939.Buschi; vom Orang-Saugling zum Backenwulster. Quelle und Meyer, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. E. Le Gros, 1952. Report on fossil hominoid material collected by the British-Kenya Miocene Expedition, 1949–1951.Zool. Soc. London, Proc., 122: 273–286, 3 pls.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &L. S. B. Leakey, 1950. Diagnoses of East African Miocene Hominoidea.Geol. Soc. London, Quart. Jour., 105: 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, & ————, 1951. The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa.Fossil Mammals of Africa, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1: 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deraniyagala, P. E. P., 1948. Some scientific results of two vistits to Africa.Spolia Zeylan., 25: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbusch, Volker, 1976. Report on the International Symposium on mammalian stratigraphy of European Tertiary.Neusl. Stratigr., 5: 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D., 1977. Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size inAegyptopithecus andProconsul.Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 47: 395–398.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijer, D. A., 1948. Prehistoric teeth of man and the Orang-Utan from Central Sumatra, with notes on fossil Orang-Utan from Java and southern China.Zool. Meden., 29: 175–301, pl. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. T., 1933a. Miocene primates from British East Africa.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (ser. 10), 11: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1933b. Miocene primates from Kenya.Linn. Soc. London, J., 38: 437–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, F. C. &F. Bourliere, 1963.African Ecology and Human Evolution. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, D. C., 1974. Some metric aspects of the permanent and deciduous dentition of the pygmy chimpanzee (Pan paniscus).Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 41: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronfeld, R., 1954. Development and calcification of the human deciduous and permanent dentition. In:Basic Readings on the Identification of Human Skeletons,T. D. Stewart &M. Trotter (eds.), Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legoux, P., 1966.Determination de l’age dentaire de fossiles de la lignée humaine. Libraire Maloine, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. T., 1972. Miocene mammals, stratigraphy, and environment of Muruarot Hill, Kenya.PaleoBios, 14: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1977.Tetralophodon (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae) from Subsaharan Africa.Rev. Zool. Afr., 91: 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. E., 1978. Hyracoidea. In:Evolution of African Mammals,V. J. Maglio &H. B. S. Cooke (eds.), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 284–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., 1949. Africa from Nubia to Turkana.Sci. Monthly, 69: 264–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D. R., 1967. Tertiary Pongidae of East Africa: Evolutionary relationships and taxonomy. Univ. Microfilms, 185 pp., 31 pls.

  • ————, 1969. Tertiary Pongidae of East Africa: Evolutionary relationships and taxonomy.Yale Peabody Mus. Bull., 31: 1–185, pl. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, &S. M. Ibrahim Shah, 1977. New hominoid primates from the Siwaliks of Pakistan and their bearing on hominoid evolution.Nature, 270: 689–695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H., 1956. Postembryonic age changes.Primatologia, 1: 887–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., 1956.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, xviii + 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., 1965. New fossil apes from Egypt and the initial differentiation of the Hominoidea.Nature, 205: 135–139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———— &D. R. Pilbeam, 1965. Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea).Folia Primat., 3: 81–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. &R. G. Dodson, 1969. Geology of the Northern Turkana.Geol. Sur. Kenya Rept., 82: 1–42, 2 mps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whybrow, P. J. &Peter Andrews, 1978. Restoration of the holotype ofProconsul nyanzae.Folia Primat., 30: 115–125.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Madden, C.T. NewProconsul (Xenopithecus) from the Miocene of Kenya. Primates 21, 241–252 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374037

Keywords

Navigation