Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A permanent colostomy is a serious limitation of the quality of life. Besides cure of cancer, preservation of sphincter function is an important goal of surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: In a prospective study a concept offering every patient with rectal cancer either sphincter salvage or a “neosphincter” was investigated, and the impact of this strategy on oncologic results, sphincter function, and quality of life was analyzed. RESULTS: From 1992 to 1997, 276 patients were accepted for the study. Two hundred sixty-one patients had elective surgery, and 15 patients had emergency surgery for their rectal tumors. The postoperative mortality rate was 4 percent. A radical resection (R0) was possible in 197 patients (75 percent). Anterior resection was the most common procedure (n=87), and intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis was the preferred method for low tumors (n=65). Abdominoperineal resection was necessary in 15 cases. Thirteen patients had an immediate restoration of sphincter function by means of a dynamic graciloplasty, and 2 patients needed emergency abdominoperineal resection for bleeding. The follow-up was relatively short (median, 36.4 months) at the time of data analysis and showed a local recurrence rate of 8 percent. Although postoperative continence according to the Williams score revealed satisfactory results, subjective quality of life and the scale for specific symptoms showed a significantly worse outcome in patients with ultralow (coloanal) anastomoses compared with those with anterior resection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that for elective curative surgery of rectal cancer, a permanent colostomy is not necessary provided all presently available techniques of sphincter salvage and restoration are applied. However, the patient has to be informed about possible side effects associated with surgical procedures such as coloanal anastomosis or neosphincter reconstruction, to avoid severe psychological difficulties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics, 1993. CA Cancer J Clin 1993;43:7–26.
Leo E, Belli F, Baldini MT,et al. New perspectives in the treatment of low rectal cancer: total rectal resection and coloendoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S62–8.
Rosen HR, Feil W, Novi, Zöch G, Dahlberg S, Schiessel R. The electrically stimulated (dynamic) graciloplasty for fecal incontinence—first experiences with a modified muscle sling. Int J Colorect Dis 1994;9:184–6.
Williams NS, Patel J, George RD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.
Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F,et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.
Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G,et al. Perineal colostomy and electro-stimulated gracilis “neosphincter” after abdomino-perineal resection of the colon and anorectum: a surgical experience and follow-up study in 47 cases. Int J Colorect Dis 1990:5:6–11.
Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, Ate Velde M. Quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: stomavs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9.
Urban M, Rosen HR, Hölbling N,et al. MRI for preoperative planning of sphincter saving surgery in tumors of the lower third of the rectum: the use of intravenous and endorectal contrast material. Radiology 1999 (in press).
MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60.
Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8.
Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med [A] 1981;15(3 Part 1):221–9.
Tüchler H, Hofmann S., Bernhart M.,et al. A short multilingual quality of life questionnaire—practicability, reliability and interlingual homogeneity. Qual Life Res 1992;1:107–17.
Adang EM, Engel GL, Konsten J, Baeten CG. Quality of life after dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: first results. Theor Surg 1993;8:122–4.
Kaplan LK, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Am J Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.
Cronbach LJ. The coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 1951;16:297–302.
Lord FM, Novick MR, eds. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison Wesley, 1968.
Dukes CE. Management of a permanent colostomy: study of 100 patients at home. Lancet 1947;2:12–4.
Williams NS, Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1983;70:460–2.
Shelton AA, Madoff RD. Defining anal incontinence: establishing a uniform continence scale. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1997;8:54–60.
Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendariz P, Rodriguez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.
Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Renner, K., Rosen, H.R., Novi, G. et al. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1160–1167 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238568
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238568