Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized trial of switching rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission with injectable gold to auranofin

  • Originals
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This prospective unblinded 24-month-study compared the therapeutic value of oral gold with injectable gold to maintain rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical remission and prevent the progression of erosive disease. Forty-six patients with definite RA in remission with injectable gold were randomized into two groups: a control group, continued on maintenance injectable gold (Solganal, aurothioglucose, 50–100 mg, intramuscularly, 2 to 4 weeks); and an experimental group, switched to oral gold (6–9 mg auranofin by mouth daily).

Only 29% of the original 24 oral gold patients remained on assigned treatment at 24 months compared with 64% of the injectable gold group. By six months, over one-half of the oral gold patients had electively stopped their randomized therapy. Sixty-seven percent of the oral gold patients had adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal complaints, compared with one proteinuria in the injectable gold group. The oral gold group experienced significantly more deterioration in all the primary measures of treatment effect over the follow-up period. At the termination of the trial, 88% of the group had increases of 5 or more points in radiographic scores suggesting progression of erosive disease compared with only 29% of the control group.

These data suggest that oral gold is not an effective substitute for injectable gold in maintaining remission in rheumatoid arthritis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Research subcommittee of the Empire Rheumatism Council. Gold therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: report of a multicentre controlled tiral. Ann Rheum Dis 1960, 19, 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Research subcommittee of the Empire Rheumatism Council. Gold therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: final report of a multicentre controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 1961, 20, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooperating clinics committee of the ARA: A controlled trial of gold salt therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1973, 16, 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ward, J.R., Williams, H.J., Egger, M.J., Reading, J.C., Bouce, E., Altz-Smith, M., Samuelson, C.O., Wilkens, R.F., Solsky, M.A., Hayes, S.P., Block, K.L., Weinstein, A., Meenan, R.F., Guttaduria, M., Kaplan, S.B., Kippel, J. Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 1983, 26, 1303–1315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blodgett, R.C. Jr., Heuer, M.A., Pietrusko, R.G. Auranofin: a unique oral chrysotherapeutic agent. Sem Arth Rheum 1984, 13, 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, P. Auranofin. Clin Rheum Dis 1984, 10, 369–383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heuer, M.A., Pietrusko, P.G., Morris, R.W., Scheffler, B.J. An analysis of worldwide safety experience with auranofin. J Rheum 1985, 12, 695–699.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, H.J., Dahl, S.L., Ward, J.R., Karg, M., Wilkens, R.F., Meenan, R.F., Altz-Smith, M., Clegg, D.O., Mikkelsen, W.M., Kay, D.R., Weinstein, A., Guttaduria, M., Paulus, H., Kaplan, S. One-year experience in patients treated with auranofin following completion of a parallel, controlled trial comparing auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate and placebo. Arthritis Rheum 1988, 31(1), 9–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schattenkirchner, M., Broll, H., Kaik, B., Muller-Fassbender, H., Rau, R., Zeidler, H. Auranofin and gold sodium thiomalate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a one-year, double-blind, comparative multicenter study. Klinische Wochenschrift 1988, 66(4), 174–176.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, P., Menard, H., Thompson, J., Harth, M., Beaudet, F. One-year comparative study of gold sodium thiomalate and auranofin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheum 1985, 12, 60–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, M.S., Read, J.L., Hutchings, H.C., Paterson, M., Harris, E.D. Jr. The cost effectiveness of auranofin: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Rheum 1988, 15(1), 35–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, J.J., Felson, D.T., Meenan, R.F., Williams, H.J. Which traditional measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Arthritis Rheum 1989, 32(9), 1093–1099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ropes, M.W., Bennett, G.A., Cobb, S., Jacox, R., Jessar, R. Revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis 1958, 9, 175–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinals, R.S., Masi, A.T., Larsen, R.A. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1981, 24(10), 1308–1315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharp, J.T., Young, D.Y., Bluhm, G.B., Brook, A., Brower, A.C., Corbett, M., Decker, J.L., Genant, H.K., Gofton, P., Goodman, N., Larsen, A., Lidskey, M.D., Pussila, P., Weinstein, A.S., Weissman, B. How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1985, 28, 1326–1334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press. Ames, IA, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalbfleisch, J.D., Prentice, R.L. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hand, D.H., Taylor, C.C. Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Repeated Measures. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishyop, Y.M.M., Feinberg, S.E., Holland, P.M.W. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, Y.J., Ellenberg, J., Hirtz, G., Nelson, K.B. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received. Is it really an option? Stat Med 1991, 10, 1595–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharp, J.T. Radiologic assessment as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989, 32, 221–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott, D.L., Dawes, P.T., Fowler, P.D., Gundulis, K.A., Shadforth, M., Bacon, P.A. Antirheumatic drugs and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med 1985, 54, 49–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iannuzzi, L., Dawson, N., Zein, N., Kushner, I. Does drug therapy show radiographic deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis? NEJM 1984, 309(17), 1023–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharp, J.T., Wolfe, F., Mitchell, D.M., Bloch, D.A. The progression of erosion and joint space narrowing score in rheumatoid arthritis during the first twenty-five years of disease. Arthritis Rheum 1991, 34(6), 660–668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sigler, J.W., Bluch, G.B., Duncan, H., Sharp, J.F., Ensign, D.C., McGrum, W.R. Gold salts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A double-blind study. Ann Int Med 1974, 80, 21–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luukkainen, R. Chrysotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: With particular emphasis on the effect of chrysotherapy on radiographical changes and on the optimal time of initiation of therapy. Scan J Rheum (Suppl) 1980, 34, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, G., Fries, J.F., Leigh, J.P., Bloch, D.A., Williams, C.A. From experiment to experience: The effectiveness of auranofin in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum 1990, 33(9), S82.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dahl, S.L., Samuelson, C.O., Williams, H.J., Ward, J.R., Karg, M. Second-line antirheumatic drugs in the elderly with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of three controlled trials. Pharmacother 1990, 10(2), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger, M.E., Bernhard, G.L., Heuer, M.D., Obrien, W.M., Reese, R.W., Rosenthal, S.H., Weiss, T.E., Schoffler, B.J. Therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: Transforming treatment from injectable gold to auranofin. Auranofin proceedings from the SK&F International Symposium, Amsterdam. Eds.: Capell, H.A., Cole, D.S., Maahani, K.K., Morris, R.W. In: Excerpta Medica. Elsevier Science Publishing, 1983, 201–209.

  30. Hull, R.O., Morgan, S.H., Parke, A.L., Childs, L., Goldman, M., Hughes, G.R.V. A double-blind comparison of auranofin and myochrisin in patients previously stabilized on myochrisin. Auranofin Proceedings of the SK&F International Symposium, Amsterdam. Eds.: Capell, H.A., Cole, D.S., Maahani, K.K., Morris, R.W. In: Excerpta Medica. Elsevier Science Publishing 1983, 211–225.

  31. Blackburn, W.D. Jr. Auranofin: its use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis maintained with parenteral chrysotherapy. J Rheumatol 1987, 14(4), 863–864.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Felson, D.T., Anderson, J.J., Mennan, R.F. The comparable efficacy and toxicity of second line agent drugs in RA. Results of two meta analyses, Arthritis Rheum 1990, 33(10), 1449–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grootveld, M., Blake, D.R., Sahinoglu, T., Claxson, A.W., Mapp, P., Stevens, C., Allen, R.E., Furst, A. Control of oxidative damage in rheumatoid arthritis by gold(I)-thiolate drugs. Free Radical Research Communications 1990, 10(4–5), 199–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kopicky-Burd, J.A., Kagey, Sobotka, A., Peters, S.P., et al. Characterization of human synovial mast cells. J Rheum 1988, 15(9), 1326–1333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prete, P.E., Zane, J., Krailo, M. et al. Randomized trial of switching rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission with injectable gold to auranofin. Clin Rheumatol 13, 60–69 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229867

Key words

Navigation