Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of public debt maturities

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper studies financing strategies which underlie the maturity structure of the public debt. Three important objectives for domestic public debt management are distinguished: interest cost reduction, economic stabilization and economic neutrality. The strategies which can be associated with these objectives are incorporated in a simple debt management model, which has been tested empirically for the case of The Netherlands. Variations in debt maturities between 1960 and 1985 appear to be related to changes in capital market conditions, investment preferences and expected real interest rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Jr., C.C., ‘The Basis and Practice of Treasury Debt Management,’ in: M.P. Dooley, H.M. Kaufman, and R.E. Lombra (eds.),The Political Economy of Policy-Making, Beverly Hills, 1979, pp. 175–218.

  • Berg, P.J.C.M. van den, G.M.M. Gelauff and V.R. Okker, ‘The FREIA-KOMPAS Model for The Netherlands: A Quarterly Macro-economic Model for the Short and Medium Term,’ Central Planning Bureau,Occasional Papers, no. 39, The Hague, 1987.

  • Bomhoff, E.J.,Inflation, The Quantity Theory, and Rational Expectations, Amsterdam, 1980.

  • Chouraqui, J.-C., B. Jones and R.B. Montador, ‘Public Debt in a Medium-Term Perspective,’OECD Economic Studies, no. 7, Autumn 1986, pp. 103–153.

  • Commissie Economische Deskundigen,Rapport conjunctuurbeleid in de jaren tachtig, SER 84/13, Den Haag, 1984.

  • Dennis, G.E.J., ‘Monetary Policy and Debt Management,’ in: D.T. Llewellyn (ed.),The Framework of UK Monetary Policy, London, 1982, pp. 244–293.

  • Friedman, M.,A Program for Monetary Stability, New York, 1960.

  • Friedman, B.M., ‘Debt Management Policy, Interest Rates, and Economic Activity,’ Mimeographed, Harvard University, 1981.

  • Goudswaard, K.P. and V. Halberstadt, ‘Aspects of Debt Management and Monetary Policy in Industrialized Countries — Illustrated by the Case of The Netherlands,’ in: B.P. Herber (ed.),Public Finance and Public Debt, Detroit, 1986, pp. 343–360.

  • Goudswaard, K.P.,Doelstellingen en effecten van de schuldpolitiek, Proefschrift, NIBE-publicatiereeks nr. 64, Amsterdam, 1988.

  • Goudswaard, K.P., ‘De herfinanciering van de staatsschuld,’Openbare Uitgaven, nr. 2, 1989, pp. 52–58.

  • Harvey, A.C.,The Econometric Analysis of Time Series, Oxford, 1981.

  • Jonkhart, M.J.L. and B.G.J. Walschots, ‘Het financieringsbeleid van de Staat der Nederlanden,’Economisch Statistische Berichten, no. 3638, 6-1-1988, pp. 28–33.

  • Kath, D., ‘Der Einfluss von Geldwertdnderungen auf die Zins- and Laufzeitstruktur festverzinslicher Wertpapiere,’ in: W. Ehrlicher (ed.),Geldpolitik, Zins and Staatsverschuldung, Schriften des Vereins :ur Socialpolitik, N.F. Band III, Berlin, 1981, pp. 103–129.

  • Kremers, J.J.M., ‘Financing Budget Deficits in The Netherlands,’De Economist, 135 (1987), pp. 340–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, W.E., ‘The Changing Views on Debt Management,’ in: W.L. Smith and R.L. Teigen (eds.),Readings in Money, National Income, and Stabilization Policy, Homewood, Illinois, 1970, pp. 508–518.

  • Meyerink, M.H., ‘Fen faktoranalyse van de Nederlandse schuldpolitiek,’De Economist, 122 (1974), pp. 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbradt, G.H., ‘Debt Management,’ in: D.B. Simmert and K.-D. Wagner (eds.),Staatsverschuldungkontrovers, Köln, 1981, pp. 301–316.

  • Modigliani, F. and R. Sutch, ‘Debt Management and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: An Empirical Analysis of Recent Experience,’Journal of Political Economy, 75 (1967), pp. 569–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, W.L. and J. Vuchelen, ‘Staatsschuld in de lage landen’ (Public Debt in Belgium and The Netherlands),Rotterdamse Monetaire Studies (Rotterdam Monetary Studies), no. 20, 1985.

  • OECD,Government Debt Management, Vol. 1, Objectives and Techniques, Paris, 1982 and Vol. 2, Debt Instruments and Selling Techniques, 1983.

  • Roley, V.V., ‘The Effect of Federal Debt Management Policy on Corporate Bond and Equity Yields,’Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97 (1982), pp. 645–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roley, V. V., ‘Asset Substitutability and the Impact of Federal Deficits,’ in: L.H. Meyer (ed.),The Economic Consequences of Government Deficits, Boston, 1983, pp. 89–115.

  • Smith, W.L.,Debt Management in the United States, Study Paper No. 19, Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, 1960.

  • Tobin, J., ‘An Essay on Principles of Debt Management,’ in:Fiscal and Debt Management Policies, A series of research studies prepared for the Commission on Money and Credit, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963, pp. 143–218.

  • Vries, G.H. de, ‘The Influence of Debt Management on the Term-Structure of Interest Rates,’De Economist, 127 (1979), pp. 298–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuchelen, J., ‘The Maturity Structure of the Belgian Government Debt: Causes and Possible Solutions,’ in: D.E. Fair and F. Leonard de Juvigny (eds.),Government Policies and the Working of Financial Systems in Industrialized Countries, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 285–311.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Jakob de Haan, Victor Halberstadt, Robert Haveman, Jeroen Kremers, Gusta Renes, Ben van Velthoven and two referees for valuable comments. Research assistance by Marlies Pel is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goudswaard, K.P. Determinants of public debt maturities. De Economist 138, 33–46 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718388

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718388

Keywords

Navigation