Summary
The localization of intracranial sources of EEG or MEG signals can be misled by the combined effect of several sources, as illustrated by simulated MEG data in which two of the three dipolar sources have slightly out of phase activity and partly complementary scalp topographies. These data were analysed by three different source localization methods. Fitting a single source to each sequential topography worked perfectly when only one source was active; this could also account for as much as 95% of the spatial variance of topographies resulting from two overlapping sources, although the solution was then far from any source. A principal component analysis approach followed by an oblique rotation (fitting one source to the spatial aspect of each component) correctly localized two of the sources but severely mislocated the source that was never active alone. Spatiotemporal source modeling (simultaneously fitting a set of sources to all consecutive topographies) correctly localized all three sources, provided that the parameter optimization method could escape sub-optimal local minima of the error function. Temporally overlapping sources can thus be separated and correctly identified if the mathematical model is adequate and the optimization procedure is well adapted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achim, A., Richer, F., Alain, C. and Saint-Hilaire, J.M. A test of model adequacy applied to the dimensionality of multichannel average auditory evoked potentials. In: D. Samson-Dollfus et al. (Eds.), Statistics and Topography In Quantitative EEG, Elsevier, Paris, 1988.
Cohen, D. Introduction: A 1984 perspective on biomagnetism. In: H. Weinberg, G. Stroink and T. Katila (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Applications & Theory. Pergamon Press, New York, 1985: 4–8.
Gloor, P. Neuronal generators and the problem of localization in electroencephalography: Application of volume conductor theory to electroencephalography. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 2: 327–354.
Maier, J., Dagneli, G., Spekreijse, H. and van Dijk, B.W. Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Res., 1987, 27: 165–177.
Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J., 1965, 7: 308–313.
Scherg, M. Spatio-temporal modelling of early auditory evoked potentials. Rev. Laryng. (Bordeaux), 1985, 105: 163–170.
Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 32–44.
Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 344–360.
Wood, C.C. Application of dipole localization methods to source identification of human evoked potentials. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1982, 388: 139–155.
Wood, C.C. and Wolpaw, J.R. Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1982, 54: 25–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada and from the Université du Québec à Montréal..
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Achim, A., Richer, F. & Saint-Hilaire, J.M. Methods for separating temporally overlapping sources of neuroelectric data. Brain Topogr 1, 22–28 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129336
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129336