Skip to main content
Log in

Relative mating activity of the sexes in homokaryotypes ofDrosophila persimilis from a redwoods population

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous tests for mating activity ofDrosophila persimilis homokaryotype KL (Klamath) and MD (Mendocino) chromosomal arrangements (northern California population: Redwoods) had shown KL to mate faster on the average than MD in homogamic tests. A strain (double-cross hybrid of four KL lines from the same population) with reliable high mating activity was developed for testing the sexes separately. Five pairs of KL-MD homokaryotype strains were chosen to be tested by the criterion that each pair had been derived from a separate wild KL/MD progenitor. Strains were crossed within arrangements in a diallelic design (20 inter- and five intrastrain crosses tested in 16 replicates per cross) to provide mating activity indices of four sets: KL females, KL males, MD females, MD males. Mating tests employed ten virgin experimental flies with ten tester (double-cross hybrid) flies of the opposite sex in 30-min observation periods. All flies were matured for 5 days at 25°C before testing. Among parental strains, females were consistently higher in mating activity than males for both KL and MD arrangements. Most interstrain hybrids were heterotic, with KL and MD females not significantly different. However, hybrid MD males displayed greatest variation and had lowest mating activity, while KL males were the least variable and highest in mating activity. With heterosis in the hybrids, there was no predictability (additivity) from performance of parental strains to hybrid offspring. Mating activities of the two sexes were uncorrelated, indicating either that the sexes have independent genetic systems controlling mating activity or that the expression of the same genetic system is influenced by sex. Since the hybrid males of the two karyotypes displayed different courtship activity while the females were at about an equal level of receptivity, intrasexual selection among males is likely to be important in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fulker, D. W. (1966). Mating speed in maleDrosophila melanogaster: A psychogenetic analysis.Science 153:203–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B. (1956a). A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance.Heredity 10:31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B. (1956b). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems.Austral. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, D., and Parsons, P. A. (1965). The genotypic control of mating speed and duration of copulation inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Heredity 20:381–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1966). Corpus allatum and sexual receptivity in femaleDrosophila, Anim. Behav. 15:239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1968). The effects of artificial selection for slow mating inDrosophila simulans. I. The behavioural changes.Anim. Behav. 16:108–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1964). A diallel cross for mating speeds inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetica 35:141–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A., Hosgood, S. M. W., and Lee, B. T. O. (1967). Polygenes and polymorphism.Mol. Gen. Genet. 99:165–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (1955). Selection in animals: Synthesis.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:225–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, R. N., and Spiess, E. B. (1973). Chromosomal control of mating activity inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70:459–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. (1948). What is “heterosis”?Genetics 33:439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. (1970). Mating propensity and its genetic basis inDrosophila. In Hecht, M., and Steere, W. C. (eds.),Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 315–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., and Stankevych, A. (1973). Mating speed selection and egg chamber correlation inDrosophila persimilis.Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 2:117–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., Langer, B., and Spiess, L. D. (1966). Mating control by gene arrangements inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 54:1139–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., Sherwin, R. N., and Yacher, T. H. (1971). Mating propensity of gene arrangement carriers for a redwoods population ofDrosophila persimilis.Evolution 25:461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacher, T. H., and Spiess, E. B. (1973). The development of mating propensity in two karyotypes ofDrosophila persimilis.Anim. Behav. 21:359–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant GB 34206.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiess, E.B., Yu, HF. Relative mating activity of the sexes in homokaryotypes ofDrosophila persimilis from a redwoods population. Behav Genet 5, 203–216 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066812

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066812

Key Words

Navigation