Abstract
This paper reports two studies investigating the nature of comprehension deficits in a group of 7–8 year old children whose decoding skills are normal, but whose reading comprehension skills are poor. The performance of these poor comprehenders was compared to two control groups, Chronological-Age controls and Comprehension-Age controls. The first study examined whether these comprehension difficulties are specific to reading. On two measures of listening comprehension the poor comprehenders were found to perform at a significantly lower level than Chronological-Age controls. However, they did not differ from a group of younger children matched for reading comprehension skills. This indicates that the observed comprehension difficulties are not restricted to reading, but rather represent a general comprehension limitation. The second study investigated whether these comprehension difficulties can be explained in terms of a memory deficit. The short-term and working memory skills of these three groups were examined. The poor comprehenders did not differ from their Chronological-Age controls on either of these tasks. In conclusion, it is argued that working memory processes are not a major causal factor in the creation of the comprehension difficulties identified in the present group of poor comprehenders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, N.S. (1978), Why can't John read? Perhaps he's not a good listener.Journal of Learning Disabilities 11: 633–638.
Bishop, D. (1983).Test for reception of grammar. University of Manchester, Department of Psychology.
Chapman, L.J. and Chapman, J.P. (1974). Alternatives to the design of manipulating a variable to compare retarded and non-retarded subjects.American Journal of Mental Deficiency 79: 404–411.
Daneman, M. (1987). Reading and working memory, in: J.R. Beech and A.M. Colley (eds.),Cognitive approaches to reading. Chichester: Wiley.
Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 450–466.
Dunn, L.M., Dunn L.M., Whetton, C. and Pintilie, D. (1982).The British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Hulme, C. (1988). Short-term memory development and learning to read, in: M. Gruneberg, P. Morris and R. Sykes (eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 2: Clinical and educational implications. Chichester: Wiley.
Hulme, C. (1989). Working memory and learning to read, pp. 329–340, in: P.G. Aaron and R.M. Joshi (eds.),Developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing systems in different languages. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Hulme, C. and Snowling, M. (1991). Phonological deficits in dyslexia: A ‘sound’ reappraisal of the verbal deficit hypothesis?, in: N. Singh and I. Beal (eds.),Progress in learning disabilities. Springer Verlag.
Neale, M.D. (1989).The Neale analysis of reading ability (Revised British Edition). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Oakhill, J., Yuill, N. and Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less skilled comprehenders.Journal of Research in Reading 9: 80–91.
Perfetti, C.A. and Goldman, S.R. (1976). Discourse memory and reading comprehension skill.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 15: 33–42.
Smiley, S.S., Oakley, D.D., Worthen, D., Campione, J.C. and Brown, A.L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation.Journal of Educational Psychology 69: 381–387.
Yuill, N., Oakhill, J. and Parkin, A. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly.British Journal of Psychology 80: 351–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stothard, S.E., Hulme, C. Reading comprehension difficulties in children. Read Writ 4, 245–256 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027150
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027150