Skip to main content
Log in

Generality of observational skill across verbal and nonverbal modes: Literature review and experimental test

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The resurgence of interest in observational skills and in the generality or specificity of those skills is credited to recent research on individual differences in abilities to decode nonverbal messages. The issues involved in identifying general and specific factors of accuracy are traced to developments in earlier research on observation and to events that shaped contemporary negativism toward observers. An experiment on observational generality, across two different observational settings and three types of observational cues illustrates how easily either bias — toward generality or specificity of skills — can be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, F.Social psychology. Cambridge: Riverside Press, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F.H. & Allport, G.W. Personality traits: their classification and measurement.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1921,16 6–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W.Personality. New York: Holt, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. Psychologie individuelle. La description d'un objet.Annee Psychologique 1897,3 296–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. Observational skills.Psychological Bulletin 1983,93 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R. Individual differences in nonverbal sending accuracy and electrodermal responding: the externalizing-internalizing dimension. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.”Psychological Bulletin 1955,52 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, W.J. & Hammond, K.R. The generality of accuracy and response sets in interpersonal perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1957,54 384–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M.R. Personality and the structure of the nonverbal communication of emotion.Journal of Personality 1977,45 564–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davitz, J.R. (Ed.). Personality, perceptual, and cognitive correlates of emotional sensitivity.The communication of emotional meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M. & Rosenthal, R. Ambivalence, discrepancy, and deception in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M. & Rosenthal, R. The structure of nonverbal decoding skills.Journal of Personality 1979b,47 506–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S. & Licht, B.G. Learned helplessness and intellectual achievement. In J. Garber & M.E.P. Seligman (Eds.),Human helplessness. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, R.F. A preliminary investigation of the relationship of insight and empathy.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1952,16 202–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P.Emotion in the human face. New York: Pergamon, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, S.G. Judging personality from expressive behavior.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1938,33 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D.W. A demonstration of the value of interchangeable observers.Journal of Behavioral Assessment 1979,1 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H.S. The concept of skill in nonverbal communication: implications for understanding social interaction. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N.L. Judging interests from expressive behavior.Psychological Monographs 1952,66 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. Gender, gender roles, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J.M. & DePaulo, B.M. Accuracy of person perception: a component analysis according to Cronbach.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1982,8 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta, J.T. & Kleck, R.E. Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longabaugh, R. The systematic observation of behavior in naturalistic settings. In H. Triandis (Ed.),The handbook of cross-cultural psychology: II, Methodology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotto, M.J. Observational assessment systems for use in basic and applied research.Journal of Behavioral Assessment 1979,1 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J.E. & Jones, L.The Jones-Mohr Listening Test. San Diego: University Associates Publishers, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsterberg, H.On the witness stand. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U.Memory observed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J.M.A history of clinical psychology. New York: Irvington, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (Ed.).Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Delgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., Archer, D., DiMatteo, M.R., & Rogers, P.L.Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, R. The ability to judge people.Psychological Bulletin 1955,52 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trower, P. Situational analysis of the components and processes of behavior of socially skilled and unskilled patients.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1980,48 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.L.Powers of observation: the measurement and correlates of observational ability. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri at Columbia.)

  • Wallander, J.L., Conger, A.J., & Ward, D.G. It may not be worth the effort! Trained judges' global ratings as a criterion measure of social skills and anxiety.Behavior Modification 1983,7 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, G.M. The observer as reporter: a survey of the “psychology of testimony.”Psychological Bulletin 1909,6 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J.S.Personality and prediction. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R.S., Hall, J.A., & Rosenthal, R. Accuracy of nonverbal communication as a determinant of interpersonal expectancy effects.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 1978,2 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boice, R., Hanley, C.P., Gansler, D. et al. Generality of observational skill across verbal and nonverbal modes: Literature review and experimental test. J Nonverbal Behav 8, 172–186 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987289

Keywords

Navigation