Skip to main content
Log in

Reticulammina antarctica nov. spec. (Xenophyophora, Protista) from the Weddell Sea, and aspects of the nutrition of xenophyophores

  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Xenophyophores, large deep-sea rhizopodan protists, are very rare in Antarctic seas. One specimen of Reticulammina antarctica nov. spec. was retrieved from bathyal depths in the Weddell Sea and preserved in a comparatively good condition, thus allowing a cytological description. Faecal pellets (stercomata) enclosed within the test were found to consist primarily of mineral particles. The hypothesis is offered that nutritional nitrogen compounds adsorbed by clay minerals can be extracted by these deep-sea rhizopods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathmann U, Schulz-Baldes M, Fahrbach E, Smetacek V, Hubberten H-W (1992) Die Expeditionen ANTARKTIS IX/1–4 des Forschungsschiffes “Polarstern” 1990/91. Ber Polarforsch 100:1–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright NG, Gooday AJ, Jones AR (1989) The morphology, internal organization, and taxonomic position of Rhizammina algaeformis Brady, a large, agglutinated, deep-sea foraminifer. J Foraminiferal Res 19:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage JD, Tyler PA (1991) Deep-sea biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 504 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ (1991) Xenophyophores (Protista, Rhizopoda) in boxcore samples from the abyssal northeast Atlantic Ocean (Biotrans Area): Their taxonomy, morphology, and ecology. J Foraminiferal Res 21:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Nott JA (1982) Intracellular barite crystals in two xenophyophores, Aschetnonella ramuliformis and Galatheammina. (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) with comments on the taxonomy of A. ramuliformis, J Mar Biol Ass UK 62:595–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann RS, Wakefield WW, Genin A (1989) Distribution of epibenthic megafauna and lebensspuren on two central North Pacific seamounts. Deep-Sea Res 36: 1863–1896

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemche H, Hansen B, Madsen FJ, Tendal OS, Wolff T (1976) Hadal life as analyzed from photographs. Vid Meddl Dansk naturhistorisk Forening 139:263–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Gooday AJ (1992) Possible roles for xenophyophores in deep-sea carbon cycling. In: Rowe T, Pariente V (eds) Deep-sea food chains and the global carbon cycle. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Thomas CL (1988) The ecology of xenophyophores (Protista) on eastern Pacific seamounts. Deep-Sea Res 35:2003–2027

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NB (1979) Developments in deep-sea biology. Blandford Press; Poole, Dorset, 566 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller PJ (1977) C/N ratios in Pacific deep-sea sediments: Effect of inorganic ammonium and organic nitrogen compounds sorbed by clays. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 41:765–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Page FC (1982) Xenophyophorea. In: Parker SP (ed) Synopsis and classification of living organisms. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Vol. 1, pp 525–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer F, Schachtschabel P (1976) Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. 9. Aufl., neubearbeitet von Schachtschabel P, Blume H-P, Hartge KH, Schwertmann U eds. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 394 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze FE, Thierfelder H (1905) Über Baryumsulfat in Meerestieren (Xenophyophoren). Sber Ges Naturf Freunde Berlin 1905:2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons KL, Landrum BJ (1973) Bottom photographs of Antarctic benthos. Antarct J US 8:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetacek V, Scharek R, Nöthig E-M (1990) Seasonal and regional variation in the pelagial and its relationship to the life history of krill. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems. Ecological change and conservation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinbanks DD (1982) Paleodictyon: The traces of infaunal xeno hyophores. Science 218:47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinbanks DD, Shirayama Y (1986) High levels of natural radionuclides in a deep-sea infaunal xenophyophore. Nature, London 320:354–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal OS (1972) A monograph of the Xenophyophoria (Rhizopodea, Protozoa). Galathea Rep 12:7–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal OS (1979) Aspects of the biology of Komokiacea and Xenophyophoria. Sarsia 64:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal OS (1989) Phylum Xenophyophora. In: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M, Chapman DJ (eds) Handbook of the protoctista. Jones and Bartlett Publisher, Boston, pp 135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal OS, Gooday AJ (1981) Xenophyophoria (Rhizopoda, Protozoa) in bottom photographs from the bathyal and abyssal NE Atlantic. Oceanol Acta 4:415–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal OS, Lewis KB (1978) New Zealand xenophyophores: upper bathyal distribution, photographs of growth position, and a new species. N Z J Mar Freshwat Res 12:197–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riemann, F., Tendal, O.S. & Gingele, F.X. Reticulammina antarctica nov. spec. (Xenophyophora, Protista) from the Weddell Sea, and aspects of the nutrition of xenophyophores. Polar Biol 13, 543–547 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236396

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236396

Keywords

Navigation