Skip to main content

Diagnosis: Patient Evaluation (Flowchart)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intra Uterine Adhesions

Abstract

The diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and Asherman’s syndrome has always been challenging. The development of diagnostic techniques and the raised awareness of the condition have led to a more reliable diagnosis and management of this intrauterine pathology. In this chapter, we summarize how to make the diagnosis of IUAs and Asherman’s syndrome, starting from the clinical suspicion, the first-level techniques (ultrasound scan), and the second-level ones for confirmation (hysteroscopy, or when this is not available, hysterosalpingography, sonohysterography, and magnetic resonance imaging). In particular, we highlight the key diagnostic elements for each step of the diagnostic process to suggest a specific flowchart to follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dreisler E, Kjer JJ. Asherman’s syndrome: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. Int J Women’s Health. 2019;20:191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zupi E, Centini G, Lazzeri L. Asherman syndrome: an unsolved clinical definition and management. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1380–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanstede MMF, Van Der Meij E, Goedemans L, Emanuel MH. Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003–2013. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1561.e1–8.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan Z, Goldberg JM. Hysteroscopic management of Asherman’s syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:218–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bougie O, Lortie K, Shenassa H, Chen I, Singh SS. Treatment of Asherman’s syndrome in an outpatient hysteroscopy setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:446–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amer-Cuenca JJ, Marín-Buck A, Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Caruso S, Cianci A, Lisón JF. Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(1):10–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1576054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kriseman M, Schutt A, Appleton J, Pillai A, George V, Zarutskie PW. A novel ultrasound-guided technique for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in high-risk patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38:1383–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Muscia V, et al. Endometrial preparation with dienogest before hysteroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome - one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:759–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salazar CA, Isaacson K, Morris S. A comprehensive review of Asherman’s syndrome: causes, symptoms and treatment options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. March CM. Management of Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23:63–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsui KH, Te Lin L, Cheng JT, Teng SW, Wang PH. Comprehensive treatment for infertile women with severe Asherman syndrome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53:372–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Azizi R, Aghebati-Maleki L, Nouri M, Marofi F, Negargar S, Yousefi M. Stem cell therapy in Asherman syndrome and thin endometrium: stem cell-based therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:333–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Song D, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Li TC, Zhou F, Xia E. A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1022–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vitale SG, Sapia F, Rapisarda AMC, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation of submucous myomas: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6848250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu R, Gan L, Wang S, Duan H. A cohort study comparing the severity and outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome after first- or second-trimester termination of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;238:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilman Barber AR, Rhone SA, Fluker MR. Curettage and Asherman’s syndrome-lessons to (re-) learn? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:997–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Spiezio SA, Gencarelli A, Vieira MDC, Riemma G, De Simone T, Carugno J. Differentiating a rare uterine lipoleiomyoma from uterine perforation at hysteroscopy: a scary story. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;27(1):9–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laganà AS, Alonso Pacheco L, Tinelli A, Haimovich S, Carugno J, Ghezzi F, Mazzon I, Bettocchi S. Management of asymptomatic submucous myomas in women of reproductive age: a consensus statement from the global congress on hysteroscopy scientific committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26:381–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alonso Pacheco L, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Haimovich S, Azumendi Gómez P, Carugno J. Subtypes of T-shaped uterus. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:399–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alonso Pacheco L, Laganà AS, Garzon S, Perez Garrido A, Flores Gornes A, Ghezzi F. Hysteroscopic outpatient metroplasty for T-shaped uterus in women with reproductive failure: results from a large prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:173–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amin TN, Saridogan E, Jurkovic D. Ultrasound and intrauterine adhesions: a novel structured approach to diagnosis and management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leone FPG, Timmerman D, Bourne T, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. The endometrial-myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Vignali M. Intrauterine adhesions: detection with transvaginal US. Radiology. 1996;199:757–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soares SR, Dos Reis MMBB, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:406–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Knopman J, Copperman AB. Value of 3D ultrasound in the management of suspected Asherman’s syndrome. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol. 2007;52:1016–22.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laganà AS, Ciancimino L, Mancuso A, Chiofalo B, Rizzo P, Triolo O. 3D sonohysterography vs. hysteroscopy: a cross-sectional study for the evaluation of endouterine diseases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:1173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. March CM, Israel R, March AD. Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;130:653–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamou J, Cittadini E, Perino A. Diagnosis and management of intrauterine adhesions by microhysteroscopy. Acta Eur Fertil. 1983;14:117–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1459–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pabuçcu R, Urman B, Atay V, Ergün A, Orhon E. Hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions is safe and effective in the restoration of normal menstruation and fertility. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:1141–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aboul Nasr AL, Al-Inany HG, Thabet SM, Aboulghar M. A clinicohysteroscopic scoring system of intrauterine adhesions. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2000;50:178–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Buttram VC, Gomel V, Siegler A, DeCherney A, Gibbons W, March C. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Donnez J, Nisolle M. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine adhesions (Asherman syndrome). Hysteroscopy: An Atlas Laser Oper. Laparosc; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dalfó AR, Úbeda B, Úbeda A, Monzón M, Rotger R, Ramos R, Palacio A. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: a comparison with hysteroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1405–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmadi F, Siahbazi S, Akhbari F, Eslami B, Vosough A. Hysterosalpingography finding in intrauterine adhesion (Asherman’s syndrome): a pictorial essay. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;7:155–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Salle B, Gaucherand P, De Saint Hilaire P, Rudigoz RC. Transvaginal sonohysterographic evaluation of intrauterine adhesions. J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;27:131–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Letterie GS, Haggerty MF. Magnetic resonance imaging of intrauterine synechiae. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1994;37:66–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bacelar AC, Wilcock D, Powell M, Worthington BS. The value of MRI in the assessment of traumatic intra-uterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome). Clin Radiol. 1995;50:80–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Simone Laganà .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laganà, A.S., Garzon, S., Riemma, G., Vitale, S.G. (2021). Diagnosis: Patient Evaluation (Flowchart). In: Manchanda, R. (eds) Intra Uterine Adhesions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4145-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4145-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4144-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4145-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics